Advertisement

Emerging Trends in Socket Reconstruction

  • Kasturi Bhattacharjee
  • Andrea Tongbram
Chapter
Part of the Current Practices in Ophthalmology book series (CUPROP)

Abstract

Loss of an eye is a devastating event in an individual’s life. It is of utmost importance to rehabilitate these patients with a proper fitting artificial prosthetic eye. The field of socket surgery has evolved over the last decade with better surgical techniques now available for these patients. The required procedure depends on the grade of socket contracture, and the aim of this chapter is to elucidate in brief the various techniques available for the same.

Keywords

Anophthalmic socket Contracted socket Socket reconstruction Dermis fat graft 

Notes

Disclosures

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Bhattacharjee K, Bhattacharjee H, Kuri GK, Das JK, Dey D. Comparative analysis of use of porous orbital implant with mucus membrane graft and dermis fat graft as a primary procedure in reconstruction of severely contracted socket. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2014;62:145–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gougelmann HP. The evolution of the ocular motility implant. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1976;10:689–711.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Krishna G. Contracted sockets—I (aetiology and types). Indian J Ophthalmol. 1980;28(3):117–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gundlach KKH, Gutoff RF, Hingst VHM, et al. Expansion of the socket and orbit for congenital clinical anophthalmia. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116:1214–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dunaway DJ, David DJ. Intraorbital tissue expansion in the management of congenital anophthalmos. Br J Plast Surg. 1996;49:529–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sinclair D, Dangerfiled P. Nervous system. In: Sinclair D, Dangerfield P, editors. Human growth after birth. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1998. p. 87.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Weise KG, Vogel M, Guthoff R, Gundlach K. Treatment of congenital anophthalmos with self-inflating polymer expanders: a new method. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1999;27:72–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jordan DR, Klapper SR. Evaluation and management of the anophthalmic socket and socket reconstruction. In: Smith and Nesi’s ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery. 3rd ed. Berlin: Springer; 2012. p. 1131–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tse DT. Inventor; University of Miami (Miami, FL) assignee. Integrated rigid fixation orbital expander. US patent 6,582,465 B2 June 2003.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tse DT, Pinchuk L, Davis S. Evaluation of an integrated orbital tissue expander in an anophthalmic feline model. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143(2):317–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tse DT, Abdulhafez M, Orozco MA, Tse JD, Azab AO, Pinchuk. Evaluation of an integrated orbital tissue expander in congenital anophthalmos: report of preliminary clinical experience. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;15(3):470–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tucker SM, Sapp N, Collin R. Orbital expansion of congenitally anophthalmic socket. Br J Ophthalmol. 1995;79:667–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chen D, Heher K. Management of the anophthalmic socket in pediatric patients. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2004;15:449–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Leatherbarrow B. Oculoplastic surgery. 2nd ed. London: Informa; 2011.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kaltreider SA. The ideal ocular prosthesis: analysis of prosthetic volume. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;16:388–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kaltreider SA, Lucarelli MJ. A simple algorithm for selection of implant size for enucleation and evisceration. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;18:336–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yoon JS, Lew H, Kim SJ, Lee SY. Exposure rate of hydroxyapatite orbital implants a 15-year experience of 802 cases. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(3):566–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Custer PL, Trinkaus KM. Volumetric determination of enucleation implant size. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999;128:489–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kumar S, Sugandhi P, Arora A, Pandey PK. Amniotic membrane transplantation versus mucous membrane grafting in anophthalmic contracted socket. Orbit. 2006;25:195–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bosnaik, et al. Temporalis muscle transfer: a vascular bed for autogenous dermis fat orbital implantation. Ophthalmology. 1985;92:292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Li D, Jie Y, Liu H, Liu J, Zhu Z, Mao C. Reconstruction of anophthalmic orbits and contracted eye sockets with microvascular radial forearm free flaps. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;24(2):94–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Koshima I, Narushima M, Mihara M, et al. Short pedicle thoracodorsal artery perforator (TAP) adiposal flap for three dimensional reconstruction of contracted orbital cavity. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008;61:13–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lopez-Arcas JM, Martin M, Gomez E, et al. The Guyuron retroauricular island flap for eyelid and eye socket reconstruction in children. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;38:744–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rycroft BW. An operation for treatment of severe contraction of the eye socket. Br J Ophthalmol. 1962;46:21–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kasturi Bhattacharjee
    • 1
  • Andrea Tongbram
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Ophthalmic Plastic SurgerySri Sankaradeva NethralayaGuwahatiIndia
  2. 2.Department of OrbitOculoplasty and Reconstructive Services, Sankara NethralayaChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations