Advertisement

Localization and Indoor Navigation for Visually Impaired Using Bluetooth Low Energy

  • Bhalaji Nagarajan
  • Valliappan Shanmugam
  • V. AnanthanarayananEmail author
  • P. Bagavathi Sivakumar
Conference paper
  • 223 Downloads
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 141)

Abstract

Wireless personal networks such as infrared, Bluetooth, or wireless local area networks such as Wi-Fi or a combination of both are widely used for navigation. Real-world deployment of these systems offers various challenges. In this work, we propose a localization and indoor navigation solution using short range, low-energy Bluetooth-emitting devices, called “Beacons”, which are used for identifying the location of different structures based on its position. An experimental analysis for effective placement of beacons, the data structures used, and the algorithm that would assist in navigation are discussed in detail. The algorithm is realized as a self-sufficient navigation solution for visually impaired using an Android application.

Keywords

Bluetooth low energy Identification Localization Navigation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The experiments were carried out with hardware support from the Mobile and Wireless Networks lab, Amrita School of Engineering, Coimbatore. We would like to thank Dr. Paramanathan P., Assistant Professor from the Department of Mathematics, Amrita School of Engineering for his support in formulating the paper.

References

  1. 1.
    Hsu, C.-L., Lin, J.C.-C.: An empirical examination of consumer adoption of Internet of Things services: network externalities and concern for information privacy perspectives. In: Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 62, pp. 516–527 (2016)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Visual Impairment and Blindness. In: WHO Fact Sheet (October 2017)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
    BlindSquare. www.blindsquare.com
  5. 5.
    Hsu, H.-H., Chang, J.-K., Peng, W.-J., Shih, T.K., Pai, T.-W., Man, K.L.: Indoor localization and navigation using smartphone sensory data. Ann. Oper. Res. 265(2), 187–204 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gu, Y., Lo, A., Niemegeers, I.: A survey of indoor positioning systems for wireless personal networks. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 11(1), 13–32 (First Quarter 2009).  https://doi.org/10.1109/surv.2009.090103
  7. 7.
    Dong, J., Noreikis, M., Xiao, Y.U., Yla-Jaaski, A.: ViNav: a vision-based indoor navigation system for smartphones. IEEE Trans Mob. Comput. (2018)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sharma, T., Apoorva, J.H.M., Lakshmanan, R., Gogia, P., Kondapaka, M.: Navi: navigation aid for the visually impaired. In: International Conference on Computing, Communication and Automation, pp. 971–976 (2016)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gilson, S., Gohil, S., Khan, F., Nagaonkar, V.: A wireless navigation system for the visually impaired. In: Capstone Research Project, Interdisciplinary Telecom Program, University of Colorado, Boulder (2015)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cooper, M.A., Raquet, J.F., Patton, R.: Algorithm on converting a 2D scanning LiDAR to 3D for use in autonomous indoor navigation. Adv. Robot. Autom 7(184) (2018)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gomez, C., Oller, J., Paradells, J.: Overview and evaluation of bluetooth low energy: an emerging low-power wireless technology. Sensors 12(9), 11734–11753 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.3390/s120911734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Siekkinen, M., Hiienkari, M., Nurminen, J.K., Nieminen, J.: How low energy is bluetooth low energy? Comparative measurements with Zigbee/802.15.4. In: IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference Workshops, pp. 232–237 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1109/wcncw.2012.6215496
  13. 13.
    Faragher, R., Harle, R.: An analysis of the accuracy of bluetooth low energy for indoor positioning applications. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation, pp. 201–210 (September 2014)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ananthanarayanan, V., Rajeswari, A., GouthamKashyap, P., Sharad, S.: An attack perceptive approach for reliable and secure wireless connectivity between medical devices in public environment. Int. J. Appl. Eng. Res. 10(3), 6581–6600 (2015). ISSN 0973-4562Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Turkes, O., Scholten, H., Havinga, P.J.M.: Opportunistic beacon networks: information dissemination via wireless network identifiers. In: International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communication Workshops (PerCom Workshops) (2016)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Takahashi, C., Kondo, K.: Indoor positioning method for augmented audio reality navigation systems using Ibeacons. In: 4th IEEE Global Conference on Consumer Electronics (GCCE), pp. 451–452 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1109/gcce.2015.7398636
  17. 17.
    LowViz Guide: Indoor navigation for blind and visually impaired people. AFB Accessworld Mag. 16(7) (July 2015)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Meliones, A., Sampson, D.: Blind MuseumTourer: a system for self-guided tours in museums and blind indoor navigation. Technologies 6(1) (2018)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shchekotov, M.: Indoor localization method based on Wi-Fi trilateration technique. In: Proceeding of the 16th Conference of Fruct Association (2014)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Krishnan, P., Krishnakumar, S., Seshadri, R., Balasubramanian, V.: A robust approach for maintenance and refactoring of indoor radio maps. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), LNCS, vol. 8487, pp. 360–373 (2014)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yu, S.-J., Jan, S.-S., De Lorenzo, D.S.: Indoor navigation using Wi-Fi fingerprinting combined with pedestrian dead reckoning. In: IEEE Position, Location and Navigation Symposium (PLANS), pp. 246–253 (2018). IEEEGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Das, G.K., Das, S., Nandy, S.C., Sinha, B.P.: Efficient algorithm for placing a given number of base stations to cover a convex region. J. Parallel Distrib. Comput., 1353–1358 (2006)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    CC2640 SimpleLink Bluetooth Wireless MCU (Rev. B), Datasheet, Texas Instruments (July 2016)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bluetooth Low Energy Beacons, Application Report, Texas Instruments (October 2016)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wolfram Alpha Widget: Linear programming calculator. www.wolframalpha.com/widget/
  26. 26.
    Kacorri, H., Ohn-Bar, E., Kitani, K.M., Asakawa, C.: Environmental factors in indoor navigation based on real-world trajectories of blind users. In: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, p. 56 (2018)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bhalaji Nagarajan
    • 1
  • Valliappan Shanmugam
    • 1
  • V. Ananthanarayanan
    • 1
    Email author
  • P. Bagavathi Sivakumar
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of Computer Science and EngineeringAmrita School of Engineering, Amrita Vishwa VidyapeethamCoimbatoreIndia

Personalised recommendations