Advertisement

Engineering Rhizobacterial Functions for the Improvement of Plant Growth and Disease Resistance

  • P. Jishma
  • A. Remakanthan
  • E. K. RadhakrishnanEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Maintaining the healthy plant-microbe interaction for sustainable farming is a challenging issue faced by agrarian society. For this, an in-depth understanding on the rhizospheric microbiome and its molecular dialogues with the plant is essential. The recruitment of particular organisms from soil reserve to rhizospheric region involves broad range of mechanisms. One of the attractive mechanisms which mobilize the soil microbiome to rhizosphere region is the chemotaxis, which can determine the specificity and diversity of microorganisms beneficial to plants. The recruited microbial populations further secrete and release diverse compounds to augment the plant growth and to provide protection from pathogens. Progresses with next-generation sequencing (NGS) procedures provide immense promises to study the species diversity and mechanistic features of both culturable and unculturable rhizobacteria which are interacting with diverse plants. Utilizing the plant beneficial rhizobacterial mechanisms and engineering methods for its improved functioning thus have immense agricultural promises, and the chapter is designed on that objective.

Keywords

Rhizosphere PGPR Biocontrol agents Next-generation sequencing Bioformulation 

References

  1. Ahemad M, Khan MS (2010) Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain PS1 enhances growth parameters of greengram [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] in insecticide-stressed soils. J Pest Sci 84:123–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahemad M, Kibret M (2014) Mechanisms and applications of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: current perspective. J King Saud Univ Sci 26:1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahkami AH et al (2017) Rhizosphere engineering: enhancing sustainable plant ecosystem productivity. Rhizosphere 3:233–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ahmad I et al (2011) Microbial applications in agriculture and the environment: a broad perspective. In: Microbes and microbial technology: agricultural and environmental applications. Springer, New York, pp 1–27.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7931-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Amarger N (2002) Genetically modified bacteria in agriculture. Biochimie 84:1061–1072PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Badri DV et al (2009) Rhizosphere chemical dialogues: plant–microbe interactions. Curr Opin Biotechnol 20:642–650PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bais HP et al (2006) The role of root exudates in rhizosphere interactions with plants and other organisms. Annu Rev Plant Biol 57:233–266PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Basheer J et al (2018) Assessment of plant-probiotic performance of novel endophytic Bacillus sp. in talc-based formulation. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins:1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-018-9386-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Berg G et al (2014) Illumina amplicon sequencing of 16S rRNA tag reveals bacterial community development in the rhizosphere of apple nurseries at a replant disease site and a new planting site. PLoS One 9:e111744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bevivino A et al (2014) Soil bacterial community response to differences in agricultural management along with seasonal changes in a Mediterranean region. PLoS One 9:e105515PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bowen GD, Rovira AD (1999) The rhizosphere and its management to improve plant growth. Adv Agron 66:1–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Breidenbach B et al (2016) Microbial community structure in the rhizosphere of rice plants. Front Microbiol 6:1537PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Caetano-Anolles G, Gresshoff PM (1991) Plant genetic control of nodulation. Annu Rev Microbiol 45:345–382PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carbonetto B et al (2014) Structure, composition and metagenomic profile of soil microbiomes associated to agricultural land use and tillage systems in Argentine Pampas. PLoS One 9:e99949PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chakraborty U et al (2010) Influence of Serratia marcescens TRS-1 on growth promotion and induction of resistance in Camellia sinensis against Fomes lamaoensis. J Plant Interact 5:261–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chen Y et al (2015) Comparative genomic analysis and phenazine production of Pseudomonas chlororaphis, a plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium. Genomics Data 4:33–42PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chernin L, Chet I (2002) Microbial enzymes in the biocontrol of plant pathogens and pests 84.  https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203904039.ch7 Google Scholar
  18. Compant S et al (2005) Use of plant growth-promoting bacteria for biocontrol of plant diseases: principles, mechanisms of action, and future prospects. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:4951–4959PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. David BV et al (2018) Pseudomonas fluorescens: a plant growth promoting rhizobacterium (PGPR) with potential role in biocontrol of pests of crops. In: Prasad R, Gill SS, Tuteja N (eds) Crop improvement through microbial biotechnology. Elsevier, Cambridge, MA, pp 221–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. De Mandal S, Panda A (2015) Microbial ecology in the era of next generation sequencing. J Next Gener Seq Appl 1(S1).  https://doi.org/10.4172/2469-9853.S1-001
  21. Deshwal VK et al (2003) Rhizobia as a biological control agent against soil borne plant pathogenic fungi. Indian J Exp Biol 41:1160–1164PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Dey R et al (2004) Growth promotion and yield enhancement of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) by application of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Microbiol Res 159:371–394PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dilkes B et al (2007) Host-plant selectivity of rhizobacteria in a crop/weed model system. PLoS One 2:e846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Edwards J et al (2015) Structure, variation, and assembly of the root-associated microbiomes of rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112:E911–E920PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Elend C et al (2006) Isolation and biochemical characterization of two novel metagenome-derived esterases. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:3637–3645PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Etesami H, Maheshwari DK (2018) Use of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPRs) with multiple plant growth promoting traits in stress agriculture: action mechanisms and future prospects. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 156:225–246PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Field D et al (2008) MetaSim—a sequencing simulator for genomics and metagenomics. PLoS One 3:e3373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Garcia-Fraile P et al (2015) Role of bacterial biofertilizers in agriculture and forestry. AIMS Bioeng 2:183–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Geros H et al (2016) The multifarious PGPR Serratia marcescens CDP-13 augments induced systemic resistance and enhanced salinity tolerance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). PLoS One 11:e0155026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Glick BR et al (2007) Promotion of plant growth by ACC deaminase-producing soil bacteria. Eur J Plant Pathol 119:329–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Goel R et al (2018) Toward the unculturable microbes for sustainable agricultural production. In: Role of rhizospheric microbes in soil: volume 1: stress management and agricultural sustainability. Springer, Singapore, pp 107–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Goldstein AH (1995) Recent progress in understanding the molecular genetics and biochemistry of calcium phosphate solubilization by Gramnegative bacteria. Biol Agric Hortic 12:185–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gouda S et al (2018) Revitalization of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for sustainable development in agriculture. Microbiol Res 206:131–140PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Graham PH, Vance CP (2003) Legumes: importance and constraints to greater use. Plant Physiol 131:872–877PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Grosskopf T, Soyer OS (2014) Synthetic microbial communities. Curr Opin Microbiol 18:72–77PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Handelsman J (2004) Metagenomics: application of genomics to uncultured microorganisms. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 68:669–685PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Haney CH et al (2015) Associations with rhizosphere bacteria can confer an adaptive advantage to plants. Nat Plants 1:15051PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hassen W et al (2018) Pseudomonas rhizophila S211, a new plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium with potential in pesticide-bioremediation. Front Microbiol 9:34PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Houlden A et al (2008) Influence of plant developmental stage on microbial community structure and activity in the rhizosphere of three field crops. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 65:193–201PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Huang J et al (2016) Isolation and engineering of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria Pseudomonas aeruginosa for enhanced cadmium bioremediation. J Gen Appl Microbiol 62:258–265PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jambhulkar PP, Sharma P (2014) Development of bioformulation and delivery system of Pseudomonas fluorescens against bacterial leaf blight of rice (Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae). J Environ Biol 35:843–849PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Jasim B et al (2016) Identification of endophytic Bacillus mojavensis with highly specialized broad spectrum antibacterial activity. 3 Biotech 6:187PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jasim B et al (2016a) Identification of a novel endophytic Bacillus sp. from Capsicum annuum with highly efficient and broad spectrum plant probiotic effect. J Appl Microbiol 121:1079–1094PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Jasim B et al (2016b) Surfactin, iturin, and fengycin biosynthesis by endophytic Bacillus sp. from Bacopa monnieri. Microb Ecol 72:106–119PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Jimtha John C et al (2017) Pseudomonas fluorescens R68 assisted enhancement in growth and fertilizer utilization of Amaranthus tricolor (L.). 3 Biotech 7:256PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Jishma P et al (2017) Strain-specific variation in plant growth promoting volatile organic compounds production by five different Pseudomonas spp. as confirmed by response of Vigna radiata seedlings. J Appl Microbiol 123:204–216PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. John Jimtha C et al (2017) Antifungal properties of prodigiosin producing rhizospheric Serratia sp. Rhizosphere 3:105–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. John CJ, Radhakrishnan EK (2017) Chemicobiological insight into anti-phytopathogenic properties of rhizospheric Serratia plymuthica R51. Proc Natl Acad Sci India Sect B Biol SciGoogle Scholar
  49. Jones DL et al (2009) Carbon flow in the rhizosphere: carbon trading at the soil–root interface. Plant Soil 321:5–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kakvan N et al (2013) Development of new bioformulations using Trichoderma and Talaromyces fungal antagonists for biological control of sugar beet damping-off disease. Crop Prot 53:80–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kang S-M et al (2015) Mechanism of plant growth promotion elicited by Bacillus sp. LKE15 in oriental melon. Acta Agric Scand Sect B Soil Plant Sci 65:637–647Google Scholar
  52. Kavitha K et al (2005) Development of bioformulations of antagonistic bacteria for the management of damping off of Chilli (Capsicum annuum L). Arch Phytopathol Plant Protect 38:19–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kircher M, Kelso J (2010) High-throughput DNA sequencing–concepts and limitations. BioEssays 32:524–536PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kochian L et al (2004) The physiology, genetics and molecular biology of plant aluminum resistance and toxicity. Plant Soil 274:175–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lagos L et al (2015) Current overview on the study of bacteria in the rhizosphere by modern molecular techniques: a mini review. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 15:504–523Google Scholar
  56. Lapenda JC et al (2015) Antimicrobial activity of prodigiosin isolated from Serratia marcescens UFPEDA 398. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 31:399–406PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lavecchia A et al (2015) Microbial 16S gene-based composition of a sorghum cropped rhizosphere soil under different fertilization managements. Biol Fertil Soils 51:661–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lee KWK et al (2013) Biofilm development and enhanced stress resistance of a model, mixed-species community biofilm. ISME J 8:894–907PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lundberg DS et al (2012) Defining the core Arabidopsis thaliana root microbiome. Nature 488:86–90PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Lynch JM, Whipps JM (1990) Substrate flow in the rhizosphere. Plant Soil 129:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Mahalingam CA et al (2017) Development of bioformulation and its application against management of thrips and root rot disease of mulberry, Morus alba. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci 6:2438–2449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Matthysse AG, McMahan S (1998) Root colonization by Agrobacterium tumefaciens is reduced in cel, attB, attD, and attR mutants. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:2341–2345PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  63. Mendes LW et al (2014) Taxonomical and functional microbial community selection in soybean rhizosphere. ISME J 8:1577–1587PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Metzker ML (2010) Sequencing technologies – the next generation. Nat Rev Genet 11:31–46PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Nakkeeran S et al (2006) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria formulations and its scope in commercialization for the management of pests and diseases. In: Biocontrol and biofertilization. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 257–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Noumavo PA et al (2016) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: beneficial effects for healthy and sustainable agriculture. Afr J Biotechnol 15:1452–1463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Okon Y (1985) Azospirillum as a potential inoculant for agriculture. Trends Biotechnol 3:223–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Orlando L et al (2015) Microbial community composition and diversity via 16S rRNA gene amplicons: evaluating the illumina platform. PLoS One 10:e0116955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Pandey GK et al (2014) Drought-tolerance of wheat improved by rhizosphere bacteria from harsh environments: enhanced biomass production and reduced emissions of stress volatiles. PLoS One 9:e96086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Papajorgji P (2009) Advances in modeling agricultural systems. Springer US, BostonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Peiffer JA et al (2013) Diversity and heritability of the maize rhizosphere microbiome under field conditions. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110:6548–6553PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Philippot L et al (2013) Going back to the roots: the microbial ecology of the rhizosphere. Nat Rev Microbiol 11:789–799PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Pii Y et al (2016) The interaction between iron nutrition, plant species and soil type shapes the rhizosphere microbiome. Plant Physiol Biochem 99:39–48PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Pinton R et al (2001) The rhizosphere: biochemistry and organic substances at the soil-plant interface. Marcel Dekker, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  75. Prashar P et al (2013) Rhizosphere: its structure, bacterial diversity and significance. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 13:63–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Rajkumar M et al (2008) Characterization of metal-resistant plant-growth promoting Bacillus weihenstephanensis isolated from serpentine soil in Portugal. J Basic Microbiol 48:500–508PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Rappe MS et al (2002) Cultivation of the ubiquitous SAR11 marine bacterioplankton clade. Nature 418:630–633PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Rivas R et al (2007) Biodiversity of populations of phosphate solubilizing rhizobia that nodulates chickpea in different Spanish soils. Springer Netherlands, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Rout ME, Callaway RM (2012) Interactions between exotic invasive plants and soil microbes in the rhizosphere suggest that ‘everything is not everywhere’. Ann Bot 110:213–222PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Ryan PR et al (2009) Rhizosphere engineering and management for sustainable agriculture. Plant Soil 321:363–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Saidi N et al (2009) Characterization and selection of Bacillus sp. strains, effective biocontrol agents against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. radicis-lycopersici, the causal agent of Fusarium crown and root rot in tomato. Ann Microbiol 59:191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Sait M et al (2002) Cultivation of globally distributed soil bacteria from phylogenetic lineages previously only detected in cultivation-independent surveys. Environ Microbiol 4:654–666PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Sekar J et al (2016) Microbial consortial products for sustainable agriculture: commercialization and regulatory issues in India. In: Singh HB, Sarma BK, Keswani C (eds) Agriculturally important microorganisms: commercialization and regulatory requirements in Asia. Springer, Singapore, pp 107–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Sendhilvel V et al (2007) Talc-based formulation of Pseudomonas fluorescens-induced defense genes against powdery mildew of grapevine. Arch Phytopathol Plant Protect 40:81–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Shafi J et al (2017) Bacillus species as versatile weapons for plant pathogens: a review. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip 31:446–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Shaw JLA et al (2015) Using amplicon sequencing to characterize and monitor bacterial diversity in drinking water distribution systems. Appl Environ Microbiol 81:6463–6473PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Singh A et al (2014) Rhizosphere competent microbial consortium mediates rapid changes in phenolic profiles in chickpea during Sclerotium rolfsii infection. Microbiol Res 169:353–360PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Sipes DL, Einset JW (1983) Cytokinin stimulation of abscission in lemon pistil explants. J Plant Growth Regul 2:73–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Souza RC et al (2015) Metagenomic analysis reveals microbial functional redundancies and specificities in a soil under different tillage and crop-management regimes. Appl Soil Ecol 86:106–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Spaepen S et al (2007) Indole-3-acetic acid in microbial and microorganism-plant signaling. FEMS Microbiol Rev 31:425–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Spaink HP (2000) Root nodulation and infection factors produced by rhizobial bacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol 54:257–288PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Stacey G et al (2006) Genetics and functional genomics of legume nodulation. Curr Opin Plant Biol 9:110–121PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Stempfhuber B et al (2015) Spatial interaction of archaeal ammonia-oxidizers and nitrite-oxidizing bacteria in an unfertilized grassland soil. Front Microbiol 6:1567PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Stewman S, Lincoln D (1981) Recombinant DNA breakthroughs in agriculture, industry, and medicine. Futures 13:128–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Sundheim L et al (1988) Molecular cloning of two chitinase genes from Serratia marcescens and their expression in Pseudomonas species. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 33:483–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Sutruedee P et al (2013) Bioformulation Pseudomonas fluorescens SP007s against dirty panicle disease of rice. Afr J Microbiol Res 7:5274–5283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Tringe SG, Rubin EM (2005) Metagenomics: DNA sequencing of environmental samples. Nat Rev Genet 6:805–814PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Upadhyay RK et al (2001) Biocontrol potential and its exploitation in sustainable agriculture. Springer US, BostonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Vakhlu J et al (2008) Metagenomics: future of microbial gene mining. Indian J Microbiol 48:202–215PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Van Emon JM (2016) The omics revolution in agricultural research. J Agric Food Chem 64:36–44PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Wang C et al (2000) Effect of transferring 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) deaminase genes into Pseudomonas fluorescens strain CHA0 and its gacA derivative CHA96 on their growth-promoting and disease-suppressive capacities. Can J Microbiol 46:898–907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Wani SA et al (2016) Azotobacter chroococcum – a potential biofertilizer in agriculture: an overview. In: Hakeem KR, Akhtar J, Sabir M (eds) Soil science: agricultural and environmental prospectives. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 333–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Watt M (2009) The rhizosphere: biochemistry and organic substances at the soil–plant interface. 2nd edn. Ann Bot 104:ix–ixPubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. Yang J et al (2009) Rhizosphere bacteria help plants tolerate abiotic stress. Trends Plant Sci 14:1–4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Ye L, Zhang T (2011) Pathogenic bacteria in sewage treatment plants as revealed by 454 pyrosequencing. Environ Sci Technol 45:7173–7179PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Yuan J et al (2012) Antifungal activity of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens NJN-6 volatile compounds against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:5942–5944PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Zaheer A et al (2016) Association of plant growth-promoting Serratia spp. with the root nodules of chickpea. Res Microbiol 167:510–520PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Zaidi A et al (2009) Plant growth promotion by phosphate solubilizing bacteria. Acta Microbiol Immunol Hung 56:263–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Zwirglmaier K et al (2004) Recognition of individual genes in a single bacterial cell by fluorescence in situ hybridization-ring-fish. Mol Microbiol 51:89–96PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Jishma
    • 1
  • A. Remakanthan
    • 2
  • E. K. Radhakrishnan
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.School of BiosciencesMahatma Gandhi UniversityKottayamIndia
  2. 2.Department of BotanyUniversity CollegeThiruvananthapuramIndia

Personalised recommendations