Environmental Remediation: Microbial and Nonmicrobial Prospects

  • J. Godheja
  • D. R. Modi
  • V. Kolla
  • A. M. Pereira
  • R. Bajpai
  • M. Mishra
  • S. V. Sharma
  • K. Sinha
  • S. K. Shekhar


Artificial chemicals existing in the environment at high concentrations lead to all types of pollution. There is big concern about these chemicals which are not natural but present as contaminants. This chapter focuses on remediation technologies used in decontaminating the environment. Microorganisms have an extraordinary ability of breaking down the contaminants partially or entirely. Nonmicrobial methods have also been in practice successfully as contaminant removal processes. Bacterial bioremediation methods of land filling and composting have proven to be the most economical methods to be used for both indigenous wild type and also genetically modified microbes. Nonbiological methods were grouped together as thermal and nonthermal processes that are suitable for bioremediation.


Bioremediation Microbial communities Xenobiotic compounds Detoxification Biodegradation 



My sincere thanks to Dr. D.R. Modi (Professor and Head of Department, Biotechnology), Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University, Lucknow, for his kind support, guidance, and providing valuable input to improve this chapter. Also, my sincere thanks to all the coauthors who gave me the necessary inputs for completing this book chapter.


  1. Adams JA, Reddy KR (2003) Extent of benzene biodegradation in saturated soil column during air sparging. Ground Water Monit Remed 23(3):85–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adetutu EM, Gundry TD, Patil SS, Golneshin A, Adigun J, Bhaskarla V, Aleer S, Shahsavari E, Ross E, Ball AS (2015) Exploiting the intrinsic microbial degradative potential for field-based in situ dechlorination of trichloroethene contaminated groundwater. J Hazard Mater 300:48–57PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agarry S, Owabor C, Yusuf R (2010) Bioremediation of soil artificially contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbon oil mixtures: evaluation of the use of animal manure and chemical fertilizer. Biorem J 14:189–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aislabie J, Saul DJ, Foght JM (2006) Bioremediation of hydrocarbon contaminated polar soils. Extremophiles 10:171–179PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ali H, Khan E, Sajad MA (2013) Phytoremediation of heavy metals—concepts and applications. Chemosphere 91:869–881PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Álvarez-Hornos FJ, Gabaldón C, Martínez-Soria V, Martín M, Marzal P, Penya-roja JP (2008) Biofiltration of ethylbenzene vapors: influence of the packing material. Bioresour Technol 99:269–276PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Anderson A, Mitchell P (2003) Treatment of mercury-contaminated soil, mine waste and sludge using silica micro-encapsulation. TMS annual meeting, extraction and processing division, March 2–6 2003, San Diego, CA, pp 265–274Google Scholar
  8. Aslett D, Haas J, Hyman M (2011) Identification of tertiary butyl alcohol(TBA)-utilizing organisms in BioGAC reactors using 13C-DNA stable isotope probing. Biodegradation 22(5):961–972PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Atagana HI (2004) Co-composting of PAH-contaminated soil with poultry manure. Lett Appl Microbiol 39:163–168PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Atagana H (2008) Compost bioremediation of hydrocarbon-contaminated soil inoculated with organic manure. Afr J Biotechnol 7:1516–1525Google Scholar
  11. Baker RS, Heron G (2004) In-situ delivery of heat by thermal conduction and steam injection for improved DNAPL remediation. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on remediation of chlorinated and recalcitrant compounds, Monterey, CA, May 24–27, 2004, Battelle Columbus, OHGoogle Scholar
  12. Baptista JS, Cammarota CM, Carvalhofreire DD (2005) Production of CO2 in crude oil bioremediation in clay soil. Braz Arch Biol Technol 48:249–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Barr D (2002) Biological methods for assessment and remediation of contaminated land: case studies. Construction Industry Research and Information Association, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Benner ML, Mohtar RH, Lee LS (2002) Factors affecting air sparging remediation systems using field data and numerical simulations. J Hazard Mater 95(3):305–329PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Beyke G, Fleming D (2002) Enhanced removal of separate phase viscous fuel by electrical resistance heating and multi-phase extraction. 9th annual international petroleum environmental conference, October 22–25, 2002, Albuquerque, NMGoogle Scholar
  16. Bingham PA, Hand RJ (2006) Vitrification of toxic wastes: a brief review. Adv Appl Ceram 105(1):21–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Block P, Brown R, Robinson D (2004) Novel activation technologies for sodium persulfate in situ chemical oxidation. In: Proceedings of the fourth international conference on the remediation of chlorinated and recalcitrant compounds, Monterey, CAGoogle Scholar
  18. Boreen AL, Arnold WA, McNeill K (2003) Photodegradation of pharmaceuticals in the aquatic environment: a review. Aquat Sci 65(4):320–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Boschker HTS, Nold SC, Wellsbury P, Bos D, de Graaf W, Pel R, Parkes RJ, Cappenberg TE (1998) Direct linking of microbial populations to specific biogeochemical processes by 13C-labelling of biomarkers. Nature 392:801–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Brillas E, Calpe JC, Cabot PL (2003) Degradation of the herbicide 2,4- dichlorophenoxyacetic acid by ozonation catalyzed with Fe2þ and UVA light. Appl Catal B Environ 46(2):381–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Brown R (2003) In situ chemical oxidation: performance, practice, and pitfalls. 2003 AFCEE technology transfer workshop, February 25 2003, San Antonio, TXGoogle Scholar
  22. Burken JG (2004) Uptake and metabolism of organic compounds: Green-liver model. In: McCutcheon SC, Schnoor JL (eds) Phytoremediation: transformation and control of contaminants, a Wiley-Interscience series of texts and monographs. John Wiley, Hoboken, p 59Google Scholar
  23. Burken J, Vroblesky D, Balouet JC (2011) Phytoforensics, dendrochemistry, and phytoscreening: new green tools for delineating contaminants from past and present. Environ Sci Technol 45(15):6218–6226PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Burrows HD, Canle L, Santaballa M, Steenken S (2002) Reaction pathways and mechanisms of photodegradation of pesticides. J Photochem Photobiol B Biol 67(2):71–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Busch-Harris J, Sublette K, Roberts KP, Landrum C, Peacock AD, Davis G, Ogles D, Holmes WE, Harris D, Ota C, Yang X (2008) Bio-traps coupled with molecular biological methods and stable isotope probing demonstrate the in situ biodegradation potential of MTBE and TBA in gasoline-contaminated aquifers. Groundw Monit Remediat 28(4):47–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Catania V, Santisi S, Signa G, Vizzini S, Mazzola A, Cappello S, Yakimov MM, Quatrini P (2015) Intrinsic bioremediation potential of a chronically polluted marine coastal area. Mar Pollut Bull 99:138–149PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Catia TDP, Mariano M, Janaína F, Medeiros B, Susana JK, Carlos A, Veiga B (2010) Biodegradation of phenol by free and encapsulated cells of a new Aspergillus sp. isolated from a contaminated site in southern Brazil. Afri J Biotechnol 9:6716–6720Google Scholar
  28. Chaudhary DS, Vigneswaran S, Ngo HH, Shim WG, Moon H (2003) Biofilter in water and wastewater treatment. Korean J Chem Eng 20(6):1054–1065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Chemlal R, Abdi N, Lounici H, Drouiche N, Pauss A, Mameri N (2013) Modeling and qualitative study of diesel biodegradation using biopile process in sandy soil. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation 78:43–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Chikere CB, Chikere BO, Okpokwasili GC (2012) Bioreactor-based bioremediation of hydrocarbon-polluted Niger Delta marine sediment, Nigeria. 3 Biotech 2:53–66PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Chu W, Chan KH (2003) The mechanism of the surfactant-aided soil washing system for hydrophobic and partial hydrophobic organics. Sci Total Environ 307(1–3):83–92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Cloete TE et al (eds) (2010) Nanotechnology in water treatment applications. Caister Academic Press, NorfolkGoogle Scholar
  33. Coulon F, Al Awadi M, Cowie W, Mardlin D, Pollard S, Cunningham C, Risdon G, Arthur P, Semple KT, Paton GI (2010) When is a soil remediated? Comparison of biopiled and windrowed soils contaminated with bunker-fuel in a full-scale trial. Environ Pollut 158:3032–3040PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Crane RA, Scott TB (2012) Nanoscale zero-valent iron: future prospects for an emerging water treatment technology. J Hazard Mater 211-212:112–125PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Danika L, Norman T (2005) Phytoremediation of toxic trace elements in soil and water. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 32:514–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Darvishzadeh T, Priezjev NV (2012) Effects of cross flow velocity and transmembrane pressure on microfiltration of oil-in-water emulsions. J Membr Sci 423–424:468–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. de-Bashan LE, Hernandez JP, Bashan Y (2012) The potential contribution of plant growth-promoting bacteria to reduce environmental degradation – a comprehensive evaluation. Appl Soil Ecol 61:171–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Delille D, Duval A, Pelletier E (2008) Highly efficient pilot biopiles for on-site fertilization treatment of diesel oil-contaminated sub-Antarctic soil. Cold Reg Sci Technol 54:7–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Dermatas D, Meng X (2003) Utilization of fly ash for stabilization/ solidification of heavy metal contaminated soils. Eng Geol 70(3–4):377–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Di Palma L, Ferrantelli P, Merli C, Biancifiori F (2003) Recovery of EDTA and metal precipitation from soil flushing solutions. J Hazard Mater 103(1–2):153–168PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Dias RL, Ruberto L, Calabró A, Balbo AL, Del Panno MT, Mac Cormack WP (2015) Hydrocarbon removal and bacterial community structure in on-site biostimulated biopile systems designed for bioremediation of diesel-contaminated Antarctic soil. Polar Biol 38:677–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Diele F, Notarnicola F, Sgura I (2002) Uniform air velocity field for a bioventing system design: some numerical results. Int J Eng Sci 40(11):1199–1210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Feng D, Lorenzen L, Aldrich C, Mare PW (2001) Ex-situ diesel contaminated soil washing with mechanical methods. Miner Eng 14(9):1093–1100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Filler DM, Lindstrom JE, Braddock JF, Johnson RA, Nickalaski R (2001) Integral biopile components for successful bioremediation in the Arctic. Cold Reg Sci Technol 32(2–3):143–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Frutos FJG, Escolano O, Garcia S, Mar Babin M, Fernandez MD (2010) Bioventing remediation and ecotoxicity evaluation of phenanthrene-contaminated soil. J Hazard Mater 183:806–813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Geyer R, Peacock AD, Miltner A, Richnow HH, White DC, Sublette KL, Kästner M (2005) In situ assessment of biodegradation potential using biotraps amended with 13C-labeled benzene or toluene. Environ Sci Technol 39(13):4983–4989PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Gidarakos E, Aivalioti M (2007) Large scale and long term application of bioslurping: the case of a Greek petroleum refinery site. J Hazard Mater 149:574–581PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Gomez F, Sartaj M (2014) Optimization of field scale biopiles for bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbon contaminated soil at low temperature conditions by response surface methodology (RSM). Int Biodeterior Biodegradation 89:103–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Grobelak A, Napora A, Kacprzak M (2015) Using plant growthpromoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) to improve plant growth. Ecol Eng 84:22–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Gullett BK (2003) PCDD/F from uncontrolled combustion. First Session, Expert Group on Best Available Techniques and Best Environmental PracticesGoogle Scholar
  51. Halmemies S, Grondahl S, Arffman M, Nenonen K, Tuhkanen T (2003) Vacuum extraction based response equipment for recovery of fresh fuel spills from soil. J Hazard Mater 97(1–4):127–143PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Haselow J, Block P, Sessa F (2006) Pilot scale application of heat-activated persulfate at a former petroleum underground storage tank area. The 22nd international conference on soils, sediments, and water, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, October 16–19, 2006Google Scholar
  53. Hatzinger P, Fuller M (2014) New approaches to evaluate the biological degradation of RDX in groundwater. Project ER-1607. Strategic Environmental Research Development Program, ArlingtonGoogle Scholar
  54. Hejazi RF (2002) Oily sludge degradation study under arid conditions using a combination of landfarm and bioreactor technologies. PhD thesis, Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John’s, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  55. Heron GSC, Nielsen SJD (2005) Full-scale removal of DNAPL constituents using steam enhanced extraction and electrical resistance heating. Ground Water Monit Remediat 25(4, Winter):92–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Hobson AM, Frederickson J, Dise NB (2005) CH4 and N2O from mechanically turned windrow and vermicomposting systems following in-vessel pre-treatment. Waste Manag 25:345–352PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Hohener P, Ponsin V (2014) In situ vadose zone bioremediation. Curr Opin Biotechnol 27:1–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Hrapovic L, Brent E, David J, Hood ED (2005) Laboratory study of treatment of trichloroethene by chemical oxidation followed by bioremediation. Environ Sci Technol 39(8):2888–2897PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Huling S, Pivetz B (2006) Engineering issue: In Situ chemical oxidation, EPA 600/R-06/072Google Scholar
  60. Hutton B (2009) Waste management options to control greenhouse gas emissions – landfill, compost or incineration? Paper for the international solid waste association (ISWA) conference, Portugal 12–15 October 2009, pp 1–10Google Scholar
  61. Hyman M, Dupont RR (2001) Groundwater and soil remediation. Process design and cost estimating of proven technologies, ASCE Press, RestonGoogle Scholar
  62. Ijaz A, Shabir G, Khan QM, Afzal M (2015) Enhanced remediation of sewage effluent by endophyte-assisted floating treatment wetlands. Ecol Eng 84:58–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Iturbe R, Flores C, Chavez C, Bautista G, Torres L (2004) Remediation of contaminated soil using soil washing and biopile methodologies at a field level. J Soils Sediments 4:115–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Jorgensen K, Puustinen J, Suortti A (2000) Bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated soil by composting in biopiles. Environ Pollut 107:245–254PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Kao CM, Chen CY, Chen SC, Chien HY, Chen YL (2008) Application of in situ biosparging to remediate a petroleum hydrocarbon spill site: field and microbial evaluation. Chemosphere 70:1492–1499PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Kaslusky SF, Udell KS (2002) A theoretical model of air and steam co-injection to prevent the downward migration of DNAPLs during steam enhanced extraction. J Contam Hydrol 55:213–232PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Katsivela E, Moore E, Maroukli D, Strompl C, Pieper D, Kalogerakis N (2005) Bacterial community dynamics during in situ bioremediation of petroleum waste sludge in landfarming sites. Biodegradation 16:169–180PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Key KC, Sublette KL, Duncan K, Mackay DM, Scow KM, Ogles D (2013) Using DNA-stable isotope probing to identify MTBE-and TBA-degrading microorganisms in contaminated groundwater. Groundw Monitor Remed 33(4):57–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Key KC, Sublette KL, Johannes TW, Ogles D, Baldwin B, Biernacki A (2014) Assessing BTEX biodegradation potential at a refinery using molecular biological tools. Groundw Monitor Remed 34(1):35–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Khan FI, Husain T (2002) Evaluation of contaminated sites using risk based monitored natural attenuation, chemical engineering progress-AIChE, USA January 34–44Google Scholar
  71. Khan FI, Husain T (2003) Evaluation of a petroleum hydrocarbon contaminated site for natural attenuation using ‘RBMNA’ methodology. Environ Model Softw 18:179–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Kim S, Krajmalnik Brown R, Kim JO, Chung J (2014) Remediation of petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated sites by DNA diagnosis- based bioslurping technology. Sci Total Environ 497:250–259PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Kuiper I, Lagendijk EL, Bloemberg GV, Lugtenberg BJJ (2004) Rhizoremediation: a beneficial plant-microbe interaction. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 7:6–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Kuo Y, Wang S, Kao C, Chen C, Sung W (2011) Using enhanced landfarming system to remediate diesel oil contaminated soils. Appl Mech Mater 121–126:554–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Kvesitadze G, Khatisashvili G, Sadunishvili T, Ramsden JJ (2006) Biochemical mechanisms of detoxification in higher plants. Springer, Berlin/HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  76. La Chance J, Heron G, Baker R (2006) Verification of an improved approach for implementing in-situ thermal desorption for the remediation of chlorinated solvents. Paper F-32 in: Bruce M. Sass (Conference Chair), Remediation of Chlorinated and Recalcitrant Compounds—2006. Proceedings of the fifth international conference on remediation of chlorinated and recalcitrant compounds, Monterey, CA; May 2006Google Scholar
  77. Lee JH (2013) An overview of phytoremediation as a potentially promising technology for environmental pollution control. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng 18:431–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Lemieux PM, Gullett BK, Lutes CC, Winterrowd CK, Winters D (2003) Variables affecting emissions of PCDD/F from uncontrolled combustion of household waste in barrels. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 53:523–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Li P, Sun T, Stagnitti F, Zhang C, Zhang H, Xiong X, Allinson G, Ma X, Allinson M (2002) Field-scale bioremediation of soil contaminated with crude oil. Environ Eng Sci 19(5):277–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Li S, Wang S, Yan W (2016) Biodegradation of Methyl tert-Butyl Ether by Co-Metabolism with a Pseudomonas sp. Strain. Int J Environ Res Public Health 13(9)PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Liang S, Min JH, Davis MK, Green JF, Remer DS (2003) Use of pulsed-UV processes to destroy NDMA. Am Water Works Assoc 95(9):121–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Liu J, Olsson G, Mattiasson B (2004) Short-term BOD (BODst) as a parameter for on-line monitoring of biological treatment process Part I. A novel design of BOD biosensor for easy renewal of bio-receptor. Biosen Bioelect 20(3):562–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Liu W, Luo Y, Teng Y, Li Z, Ma LQ (2010) Bioremediation of oily sludge-contaminated soil by biostimulating indigenous microbes. Environ Geochem Health 32:23–29PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Logsdon SD, Keller KE, Moorman TB (2002) Measured and predicted solute leaching from multiple undisturbed soil columns. Soil Sci Soc Am J 66(3):686–695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. MacGregor BJ, Bruchert V, Fleischer S, Amann R (2002) Isolation of small-subunit rRNA for stable isotopic characterization. Environ Microbiol 4:451–464PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Manefield M, Whiteley AS, GriKths RI, Bailey M (2002a) RNA stable isotope probing, a novel means of linking microbial community function to phylogeny. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:5367–5373PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Manefield M, Whiteley AS, Ostle N, Ineson P, Bailey MJ (2002b) Technical considerations for RNA-based stable isotope probing: an approach to associating microbial diversity with microbial community function. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 16:2179–2183PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Marchiol L, Fellet G, Perosa D, Zerbi G (2007) Removal of trace metals by Sorghum bicolor and Helianthus annuus in a site polluted by industrial wastes: a field experience. Plant Physiol Biochem 45(5):379–387PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Mau L, Yue Q (2010) Remediation of diesel contaminated soil by bioventing and composting technology. In: Proceedings of international conference on challenges in environmental science and computer engineering vol 2, pp 3–6Google Scholar
  90. Meagher RB (2000) Phytoremediation of toxic elemental organic pollutants. Curr Opin Plant Biol 3(2):153–162PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Mench M, Schwitzguebel JP, Schroeder P, Bert V, Gawronski S, Gupta S (2009) Assessment of successful experiments and limitations of phytotechnologies: contaminant uptake, detoxification and sequestration, and consequences for food safety. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 16:876–900PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Mendez MO, Maier RM (2008) Phytostabilization of mine tailings in arid and semiarid environments—an emerging remediation technology. Environ Health Perspect 116(3):278–283PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Mesa J, Rodrı’guez-Llorente JD, Pajuelo E, Piedras JMB, Caviedes MA, Redondo-Go’mez S, Mateos-Naranjo E (2015) Moving closer towards restoration of contaminated estuaries: bioaugmentation with autochthonous rhizobacteria improves metal rhizoaccumulation in native Spartina maritima. J Hazard Mater 300:263–271PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Miguel AS, Ravanel P, Raveton M (2013) A comparative study on the uptake and translocation of organochlorines by Phragmites australis. J Hazard Mater 244:60–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Mihopoulos PG, Suidan MT, Sayles GD, Kaskassian S (2002) Numerical modeling of oxygen exclusion experiments of anaerobic bioventing. J Contam Hydrol 58(3–4):209–220PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Mohn W, Radziminski C, Fortin M, Reimer K (2001) On site bioremediation of hydrocarbon-contaminated Arctic tundra soils in inoculated biopiles. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 57:242–247PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Morris SA, Radajewski S, Willison TW, Murrell JC (2002) Identification of the functionally active methanotroph population in a peat soil microcosm by stable-isotope probing. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:1446–1453PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Mrassi AG, Bensalah F, Gury J, Duran R (2015) Isolation and characterization of different bacterial strains for bioremediation of n-alkanes and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 22:15332–15346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Mulchandani A, Mulchandani P, Kaneva I, Chen W (1998) Biosensor for direct determination of organophosphorous nerve agent using recombinant E. coli with surface-expressed organophosphorous hydrolase. Potentiometric microbial electrode. Anal Chem 70:4140–4145PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Natrajan KA (2008) Microbial aspects of acid mine drainage and its bioremediation. Trans Nonferrous Metals Soc China 18:1352–1360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Newmark RL (1994) Demonstration of dynamic underground stripping at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Gasoline Spill site. Final report UCRL-ID-116964, vol 1–4. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CAGoogle Scholar
  102. Nikolopoulou M, Pasadakis N, Norf H, Kalogerakis N (2013) Enhanced ex situ bioremediation of crude oil contaminated beach sand by supplementation with nutrients and rhamnolipids. Mar Pollut Bull 77:37–44PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Nkansah MA, Christy AA, Barth T (2011) The use of anthracene as a model compound in a comparative study of hydrous pyrolysis methods for industrial waste remediation. Chemosphere 84:403–408PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Nouri J, Khorasani N, Lorestani B, Karami MH, Hassani AH, Yousefi N (2009) Accumulation of heavy metals in soil and uptake by plant species with phytoremediation potential. Environ Earth Sci 59(2):315–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Nouri J, Lorestani B, Yousefi N, Khorasani N, Hasani AH, Seif S, Cheraghi M (2011) Phytoremediation potential of native plants grown in the vicinity of Ahangaran lead– zinc mine (Hamedan, Iran). Environ Earth Sci 62(3):639–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Nzila A (2013) Update on the cometabolism of organic pollutants by bacteria. Environ Pollut 178:474–482PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Orphan VJ, House CH, Hinrichs KU, McKeegan KD, DeLong EF (2001) Methane-consuming Archaea revealed by directly coupled isotopic and phylogenetic analysis. Science 293:484–486PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Orphan VJ, House C, Hinrichs KU, McKeegan KD, DeLong EF (2002) Multiple archaeal groups mediate methane oxidation in anoxic cold seep sediments. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:7663–7668PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Otterpohl R (2002) Options for alternative types of sewerage and treatment systems directed to improvement of the overall performance. Water Sci Technol 45(3):149–158PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Ottosen LM, Pedersen AJ, Ribeiro AB, Hansen HK (2005) Case study on the strategy and application of enhancement solutions to improve remediation of soils contaminated with cu, Pb and Zn by means of electrodialysis. Eng Geol 77:317–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Paudyn K, Rutter A, Kerry Rowe R, Poland JS (2008) Remediation of hydrocarbon contaminated soils in the Canadian Arctic by landfarming. Cold Reg Sci Technol 53:102–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Pavel LV, Gavrilescu M (2008) Overview of ex-situ decontamination techniques for soil clean-up. Environ Eng Manag J 7:815–834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Peter AB, Miles L Vigelahn G, Teutsch G (2006) Evaluation of natural attenuation at the contaminated site Niedergörsdorf, Tank farm 1 (in German). Fachinformationen des Landesumweltamtes Brandenburg, Heft 12Google Scholar
  114. Philp JC, Atlas RM (2005) Bioremediation of contaminated soils and aquifers. In: Atlas RM, Philp JC (eds) Bioremediation: applied microbial solutions for real-world environmental cleanup. American Society for Microbiology (ASM) Press, Washington, DC, pp 139–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. RAAG (2000) Evaluation of risk based corrective action model. Remediation Alternative Assessment Group, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John’s, NF, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  116. Rayner JL, Snape I, Walworth JL, Harvey PM, Ferguson SH (2007) Petroleum–hydrocarbon contamination and remediation by microbioventing at sub-Antarctic Macquarie Island. Cold Reg Sci Technol 48:139–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Rekha K, Thakur MS, Karanth NG (2000) Biosensors for the detection of organophosphorous pesticides. Crit Rev Microbiol 20:213–235Google Scholar
  118. Robertson D, Burnley S, Barratt R (2003) The immobilization of flue gas treatment residues through the use of a single staged wash and crystalline matrix encapsulation (CME) treatment process. In: Proceedings of the 11th Annual North American Waste to Energy Conferences (NAWTEC11), April 28–30 2003 Tampa FL, pp 135–143Google Scholar
  119. Rodrı’guez-Rodrı’guez CE, Marco-Urrea E, Caminal G (2010) Degradation of naproxen and carbamazepine in spiked sludge by slurry and solid-phase Trametes versicolor systems. Bioresour Technol 101:2259–2266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Rofiqul Islam M, Haniu H, Rafi qul Alam Beg M (2008) Liquid fuels and chemicals from pyrolysis of motorcycle tire waste: product yields, compositions and related properties. Fuel 87:3112–3122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Rupassara SI, Larson RA, Sims GK, Marley KA (2002) Degradation of atrazine by hornwort in aquatic systems. Biorem J 6(3):217–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Sabbas T, Polettini A, Pomi R, Astrup T, Hjelmar O, Mostbauer P, Cappai G, Magel G, Salhofer S, Speiser C (2003) Management of municipal solid waste incineration residues. Waste Manag 23:61–88PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Saichek R, Reddy K (2005) Electrokinetically enhanced remediation of hydrophobic organic compounds in soils: a review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 35:115–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Sánchez A, Recillas S, Font X, Casals E, González E, Puntes V (2011) Ecotoxicity of, and remediation with, engineered inorganic nanoparticles in the environment. TrAC Trends Anal Chem 30(3):507–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Santoleri JJ, Theodore L, Reynolds J (2000) Introduction to hazardous waste incineration. WileyInterscience, New York, pp 133–170Google Scholar
  126. Schmidt R, Gudbjerg J, Sonnenborg TO, Jensen KH (2002) Removal of NAPLs from the unsaturated zone using steam: prevention of downward migration by injecting mixtures of steam and air. J Contam Hydrol 55:233–260PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Serrano A, Gallego M, González J, Tejada M (2008) Natural attenuation of diesel aliphatic hydrocarbons in contaminated agricultural soil. Environ Pollut 151:494–502PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Silva-Castro GA, Uad I, Rodrı’guez-Calvo A, Gonza’lez-Lo’pez J, Calvo C (2015) Response of autochthonous microbiota of diesel polluted soils to land- farming treatments. Environ Res 137:49–58PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Sorek A, Atzmon N, Dahan O, Gerstl Z, Kushisin L, Laor Y, Mingelgrin U, Nasser A, Ronen D, Tsechansky L, Weisbrod N, Graber ER (2008) Phytoscreening: the use of trees for discovering subsurface contamination by VOCs. Environ Sci Technol 42(2):536–542PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Stals M, Carleer R, Reggers G, Schreurs S, Yperman J (2010) Flash pyrolysis of heavy metal contaminated hardwoods from phytoremediation: characterisation of biomass, pyrolysis oil and char/ash fraction. J Anal Appl Pyrol 89:22–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Subramanian M, Oliver DJ, Shanks JV (2006) TNT phytotransformation pathway characteristics in arabidopsis: role of aromatic hydroxylamines. Biotechnol Prog 22(1):208–216PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Sui H, Li X (2011) Modeling for volatilization and bioremediation of toluene-contaminated soil by bioventing. Chin J Chem Eng 19:340–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Swarnalatha S, Arasakumari M, Gnanamani A, Sekaran G (2006) Solidification/stabilization of thermally treated toxic tannery sludge. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 81:1307–1315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Taniguchi S, Murakami A, Hosomi M, Miyamura A, Uchida R (1997) Chemical decontamination of PCB-contaminated soil. Chemosphere 34(5–7):1631–1637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Thome A, Reginatto C, Cecchin I, Colla LM (2014) Bioventing in a residual clayey soil contaminated with a blend of biodiesel and diesel oil. J Environ Eng 140:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Thuan NT, Chang MB (2012) Investigation of the degradation of pentachlorophenol in sandy soil via low-temperature pyrolysis. J Hazard Mater 229–230:411–418PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Tiecher TL, Ceretta CA, Ferreira PAA, Lourenzi CR, Tiecher T, Girotto E, Nicoloso FT, Soriani HH, De Conti L, Mimmo T, Cesco S, Brunetto G (2016) The potential of Zea mays L. in remediating copper and zinc contaminated soils for grapevine production. Geoderma 262:52–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) (2008) Nanotechnology for site remediation fact sheet. Solid Waste and Emergency Response, EPA 542-F-08-009, October 2008Google Scholar
  139. U.S. EPA (1995) Geosafe Corporation in situ Vitrification innovative technology evaluation report, EPA 540/R-94/520. Office of Research and Development pp 148Google Scholar
  140. U.S. EPA. Science Policy Council (2007) Nanotechnology white paper. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, February 2007Google Scholar
  141. U.S.DOE (2002) Final remedial action report for lasagna™ phase IIb in-situ remediation of Solid Waste Management Unit 91 at the Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant, Paducah, Kentucky, OR/072037 & D1, p 80Google Scholar
  142. Van Aken B (2009) Transgenic plants for enhanced phytoremediation of toxic explosives. Curr Opin Biotechnol 20:231–236PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Vangronsveld J, Herzig R, Weyens N, Boulet J, Adriaensen K, Ruttens R, Thewys T, Vassilev A, Meers E, Nehnevajova E, van der Lelie D, Mench M (2009) Phytoremediation of contaminated soils and groundwater: lessons from the field. Environ Sci Pollut Res 16:765–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Venderbosch R, Ardiyanti A, Wildschut J, Oasmaa A, Heeres H (2010) Stabilization of biomass- derived pyrolysis oils. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 85:674–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Volpe A, D’Arpa S, Del Moro G, Rossetti S, Tandoi V, Uricchio VF (2012) Fingerprinting hydrocarbons in a contaminated soil from an Italian natural reserve and assessment of the performance of a low-impact bioremediation approach. Water Air Soil Pollut 223:1773–1782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. Wait ST, Thomas D (2003) The characterization of base oil recovered from the low temperature thermal desorption of drill cuttings, SPE/EPA exploration and production environmental conference, March 10–12, San Antonio, TX, pp 151–158Google Scholar
  147. Walter Simmler (2011) Air, 6. Photochemical degradation in Ullmann’s encyclopedia of industrial chemistry. Wiley-VCH, WeinheimGoogle Scholar
  148. Wang J, Kane SA, Liu J, Symth MR, Rogers K (1996) Mushroom tissue based biosensor for inhibitor monitoring. Food Technol Biotechnol 34:51–55Google Scholar
  149. Wang J, Zhao FJ, Meharg AA, Raab A, Feldmann J, McGrath SP (2002) Mechanisms of Arsenic Hyperaccumulation in Pteris vittata. uptake kinetics, Interactions with Phosphate, and Arsenic Speciation. Plant Physiol 130(3):1552–1561PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. Wang J, Feng X, Anderson CWN, Xing Y, Shang L (2012) Remediation of mercury contaminated sites. J Hazard Mater 221:1–18PubMedGoogle Scholar
  151. Whelan MJ, Coulon F, Hince G, Rayner J, McWatters R, Spedding T, bSnape I (2015) Fate and transport of petroleum hydrocarbons in engineered biopiles in polar regions. Chemosphere 131:232–240PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. Williams N, Hyland A, Mitchener R, Sublette K, Key KC, Davis G, Ogles D, Baldwin B, Biernacki A (2014) Demonstrating the in situ biodegradation potential of phenol using bio-Sep® bio-traps® and stable isotope probing. Remediat J 23(1):7–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. Wu Z, Banuelos GS, Lin Z-Q, Liu Y, Yuan L, Yin X, Li M (2015) Biofortification and phytoremediation of Selenum in China. Front Plant Sci 6:1–8Google Scholar
  154. Xiaolei Q, Pedro AJJ, Qilin L (2013) Applications of nanotechnology in water and wastewater treatment. Water Res 47(12):3931–3946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. Yancheshmeh JB, Khavazi K, Pazira E, Solhi M (2011) Evaluation of inoculation of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on cadmium uptake by canola and barley. Afr J Microbiol Res 5:1747–1754Google Scholar
  156. Yavari S, Malakahmad A, Sapari NB (2015) A review on phytoremediation of crude oil spills. Water Air Soil Pollut 226:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  157. Yen HK, Chang NB, Lin TF (2003) Bioslurping model for assessing light hydrocarbon recovery in contaminated unconfined aquifer. I: simulation analysis. Pract Period Hazard Toxic Radioact Waste Manage 7(2):114–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. Zangi-Kotler M, Ben-Dov E, Tiehm A, Kushmaro A (2015) Microbial community structure and dynamics in a membrane bioreactor supplemented with the flame retardant dibromoneopentyl glycol. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 22:17615–17624PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. Zhan H, Park E (2002) Vapor flow to horizontal wells in unsaturated zones. Soil Sci Soc Am J 66(3):710–721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  160. Zhang C, Daprato RC, Nishino SF, Spain JC, Hughes JB (2001a) Remediation of dinitrotoluene contaminated soils from former ammunition plants: soil washing efficiency and effective process monitoring in bioslurry reactors. J Hazard Mater 87(1–3):139–154PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  161. Zhang Q, Davis LC, Erickson LE (2001b) Plant uptake of methyl-tert-butyl ether (MTBE) from groundwater. Pract Period Hazard Toxic Radioact Waste Manage 5:136–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Godheja
    • 1
  • D. R. Modi
    • 2
  • V. Kolla
    • 1
  • A. M. Pereira
    • 1
  • R. Bajpai
    • 1
  • M. Mishra
    • 1
  • S. V. Sharma
    • 1
  • K. Sinha
    • 1
  • S. K. Shekhar
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Life and Allied SciencesITM UniversityNaya RaipurIndia
  2. 2.Department of BiotechnologyBabasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar UniversityLucknowIndia

Personalised recommendations