Advertisement

Facilities for Physical Model Testing

  • Jeom Kee PaikEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Topics in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality book series (TSRQ, volume 37)

Abstract

Structures and infrastructures in modern industries are very large in size and complex in geometry. Their consequences in extreme conditions and accidents are highly nonlinear in association with multiple physical processes, multiple scales, and multiple criteria. To accurately identify nonlinear structural consequences, multidisciplinary approaches should be applied in conjuction with advanced computational models and large-scale physical model testing. This chapter presents methods and facilities for the large-scale physical model testing of structures and infrastructures in extreme and accidental conditions and for testing at the material level.

References

  1. 1.
    ASM International (2004) Chapter 1: Introduction to tensile testing. In: Product Code, ASM International, OH, USAGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    ASTM (2015) Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials. American Society for Testing and Materials, PA, USAGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Franssen JM, Real PV (2010) Fire design of steel structures. In: ECCS Eurocode design manuals. Ernst & Sohn, Berlin, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    ISO 6892-3 (2015) Metallic material—tensile testing—Part 3: Method of test at low temperature. ISO International Standard, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kim KJ, Lee JH, Park DK, Jung BG, Han X, Paik JK (2016) An experimental and numerical study on nonlinear impact responses of steel-plated structures in an Arctic environment. Int J Impact Eng 93:99–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Paik JK (2008) Mechanical collapse testing on aluminum stiffened panels for marine applications. SSC-451, Ship Structure Committee, Washington, DC, USAGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Paik JK (2018) Ultimate limit state analysis and design of plated structures, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Paik JK, Kim KJ, Lee JH, Jung BG, Kim SJ (2017) Test database of the mechanical properties of mild, high-tensile and stainless steel and aluminum alloy associated with cold temperatures and strain rates. Ships Offshore Struct 12(S1):S230–S256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Paik JK, Kim BJ, Park DK, Jang BS (2011) On quasi-static crushing of thin-walled steel structures in cold temperature: experimental and numerical studies. Int J Impact Eng 38(1):13–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Paik JK, Thayamballi AK (2007) Ship-shaped offshore installations: design, building, and operation. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Park DK, Kim DK, Park CH, Park DH, Jang BS, Kim BJ, Paik JK (2015) On the crashworthiness of steel-plated structures in an Arctic environment: an experimental and numerical study. J Offshore Mech Arct Eng 137:051501.1–051501.11Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang J, Han J, Domblesky JP, Li W, Yang Z, Zhao Y (2016) Predicting distortion in butt welded plates using an equivalent plane stress representation based on inherent shrinkage volume. J Manuf Sci Eng 138:011012-1–011012-11Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yi MS, Hyun CM, Paik JK (2018) Full-scale measurements of welding-induced initial deflections and residual stresses in steel-stiffened plate structures. Int J Marit Eng Trans R Inst Nav Archit 160(A1):395–410Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity College LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.The Korea Ship and Offshore Research Institute (Lloyd’s Register Foundation Research Centre of Excellence)Pusan National UniversityBusanKorea (Republic of)

Personalised recommendations