Advertisement

What Is Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy?

  • Shingo Fujii
  • Kentaro Sekiyama
Chapter

Abstract

Since Wertheim introduced radical hysterectomy in 1911 [1], his method became the standard procedure for the surgical treatment of cervical cancer in Western Countries. However, in Japan, Takayama and Okabayashi at Kyoto Imperial University thought that Wertheim’s method is not radical enough for invasive cervical cancers. They pursued to create a “better” surgery and Okabayashi established an anatomy oriented method to accomplish more radical surgery than that of Wertheim’s method in 1921 [2]. However, postoperatively both methods have often been associated with severe bladder dysfunction and colorectal motility disorders that adversely impacted the patient’s quality of life.

Keywords

Okabayashi’s radical hysterectomy Wertheim’s radical hysterectomy Bladder dysfunction Colorectal dysfunction Inferior hypogastric plexus (cross shape) Hypogastric nerve Pelvic splanchnic nerve Bladder branch Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy T-shaped inferior hypogastric plexus 

Supplementary material

Video 7.1

Concept and Precise Anatomical Steps for Nerve-sparing Radical Hysterectomy (MP4 2282969 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Wertheim E. Die erweiterte abdominale Operation bei Carcinoma colli Uteri (auf Grund von 500 Fallen). Berlin: Urban & Schwarzenberg; 1911.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Okabayashi H. Radical abdominal hysterectomy for cancer of the cervix uteri, modification of the Takayama operation. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1921;33:335–41.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fujii S, Takakura K, Matsumura N, Higuchi T, Yura S, Mandai M, Baba T, Yoshioka S. Anatomic identification and functional outcomes of the nerve sparing Okabayashi radical hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;107:4–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Maas CP, Trimbos JB, DeRuiter MC, van de Velde CJ, Kenter GG. Nerve sparing radical hysterectomy: latest developments and historical perspective. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2003;48:271–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dursun P, Ayhan A, Kuscu E. Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical carcinoma. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2009;70:195–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rob L, Halaska M, Robova H. Nerve-sparing and individually tailored surgery for cervical cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:292–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fujii S. Original film of the Okabayashi’s radical hysterectomy by Okabayashi himself in 1932, and two films of the precise anatomy necessary for nerve-sparing Okabayashi’s radical hysterectomy clarified by Shingo Fujii. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2008;18:383–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fujii S. Anatomic identification of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: a step-by-step procedure. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;111:S33–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kobayashi T. Abdominal radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for cancer of the cervix (in Japanese). Tokyo: Nanzando; 1961.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sakamoto S. Radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy—the Tokyo method. In: Coppleson M, editor. Gynecologic oncology. 2nd ed. Edinburg: Churchill Livingstone; 1992. p. 1257–68.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sakamoto S, Takizawa K. An improved radical hysterectomy with fewer urological complications and with no loss of therapeutic results for invasive cervical cancer. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1988;2:953–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kuwabara Y, Suzuki M, Hashimoto M, Furugen Y, Yoshida K, Mitsuhashi N. New method to prevent bladder dysfunction after radical hysterectomy for uterine cervical cancer. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2000;26:1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fujiwara T. Surgery for cervical cancer (in Japanese). Tokyo: Igakushoin; 1983.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Possover M, Stöber S, Plaul K, Schneider A. Identification and preservation of the motoric innervation of the bladder in radical hysterectomy type III. Gynecol Oncol. 2000;79:154–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Trimbos JB, Maas CP, Deruiter MC, Peters AA, Kenter GG. A nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: guidelines and feasibility in Western patients. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2001;11:180–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Barton DP, Butler-Manuel SA, Buttery LD, A’Hern RP, Polak JM. A nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: guidelines and feasibility in Western patients. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2002;12:319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Possover M. Technical modification of the nerve-sparing laparoscopy-assisted vaginal radical hysterectomy type 3 for better reproducibility of this procedure. Gynecol Oncol. 2003;90:245–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Raspagliesi F, Ditto A, Fontanelli R, Solima E, Hanozet F, Zanaboni F, Kusamura S. Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: a surgical technique for preserving the autonomic hypogastric nerve. Gynecol Oncol. 2004;93:307–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Maas CP, Kenter GG, Trimbos JB, Deruiter MC. Anatomical basis for nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: immunohistochemical study of the pelvic autonomic nerves. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005;84:868–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Raspagliesi F, Ditto A, Fontanelli R, Zanaboni F, Solima E, Spatti G, Hanozet F, Vecchione F, Rossi G, Kusamura S. Type II versus type III nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: comparison of lower urinary tract dysfunctions. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;102:256–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Murakami G, Yabuki Y, Kato T. A nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: guidelines and feasibility in Western patients. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2002;12:319–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kato T, Murakami G, Yabuki Y. A new perspective on nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: nerve topography and over-preservation of the cardinal ligament. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2003;33:589–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sakuragi N, Todo Y, Kudo M, Yamamoto R, Sato T. A systematic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy technique in invasive cervical cancer for preserving postsurgical bladder function. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2005;15:389–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Katahira A, Niikura H, Kaiho Y, Nakagawa H, Kurokawa K, Arai Y, Yaegashi N. Intraoperative electrical stimulation of the pelvic splanchnic nerves during nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2005;98:462–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kato K, Suzuka K, Osaki T, Tanaka N. Unilateral or bilateral nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: a surgical technique to preserve the pelvic autonomic nerves while increasing radicality. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2007;17:1172–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Okabayashi H. Abdominale systematische Panhysterektomie fur Karzinoma des Uterus. Jpn J Obstet Gynecol. 1928;11:136–53.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Magrina JF, Pawlina W, Kho RM, Magtibay PM. Robotic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: feasibility and technique. Gynecol Oncol. 2011;121:605–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Narducci F, Collinet P, Merlot B, Lambaudie E, Boulanger L, Lefebvre-Kuntz D, Nickers P, Taieb S, Houvenaeghel G, Leblanc E. Benefit of robot-assisted laparoscopy in nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: urinary morbidity in early cervical cancer. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:1237–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sakuragi N. Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: time for a new standard of care for cervical cancer? J Gynecol Oncol. 2015;26:81–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shingo Fujii
    • 1
  • Kentaro Sekiyama
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
  2. 2.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyKitano HospitalKita-kuJapan

Personalised recommendations