Sharing Place: A Case Study on the Loss of Peri-urban Landscape to Urbanization in India

  • Mrittika BasuEmail author
  • Osamu Saito
  • Shizuka Hashimoto
  • Rajarshi Dasgupta
Part of the Science for Sustainable Societies book series (SFSS)


Peri-urban landscapes are fast changing with the loss of its own characteristics and transforming into a new landscape with new mosaic set of characteristics that are strikingly different from the previous. There is an increasing trend across the world to transform these peri-urban areas, just outside the periphery of bigger cities, into satellite towns so that they can accommodate the city’s increasing population as well as be a development hub attracting more business and development for the area. In this study, a survey was carried out with the local communities inhabiting in village pockets inside a newly developed satellite town in the peripheries of Kolkata, one of the four metropolitan cities of India. The study enquired how the local communities perceive about sharing their land with the new residents living in high-rise apartments and how the change in the status of home gardens and sharing of its produce has changed the social relationships in the area. Majority of the respondents were found to be not happy and/or satisfied about sharing their place with the new residents as land acquisition to develop the city has resulted in loss of livelihood and income for them. The difference in sociocultural aspects was also found to be major contributor behind the gap between new and old residents in the area. The home garden status of the area has also significantly changed as most of the households have lost their property. The sharing of produce among neighbors, family members, and others in the community has also declined that results to loss of social relations.


Sharing place Urbanization Home gardens Social relation Peri-urban 



The first author is thankful to Japan Society for Promotion of Sciences (JSPS) for providing the research grant under JSPS-UNU postdoctoral fellowship to carry out the field survey. The author would also like to acknowledge the support and participation by the local people of New Town, Rajarhat, in carrying out the survey.


  1. Alayón-Gamboa JA, Gurri-García FD (2008) Home garden production and energetic sustainability in Calakmul, Campeche, Mexico. Hum Ecol 36(3):395–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Azadi H, Ho P, Hasfiati L (2010) Agricultural land conversion drivers: a comparison between less developed, developing and developed countries. Land Degrad Dev 22(6):596–604. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Banerjee S (2012) The march of the mega city: governance in West Bengal and the wetlands to the east of Kolkata. South Asian Chron 2:93–118. Available at: Google Scholar
  4. Belk R (2007) Why not share rather than own? Ann Am Acad Polit Soc Sci 611:126–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Belk R (2010) Sharing. J Consum Res 36:715–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Belk R (2014) You are what you can access: sharing and collaborative consumption online. J Bus Res 67:1595–1600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Benkler Y (2004) Sharing nicely: on shareable goods and the emergence of sharing as a modality of economic production. Yale Law J 114:273–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (eds) (2003) Navigating social–ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  9. Bonaiuto M, Breakwell GM, Cano I (1996) Identity processes and environmental threat: the effects of nationalism and local identity upon perception of beach pollution. J Community Appl Soc Psychol 6:157–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buyantuyev A, Wu J (2010) Urban heat islands and landscape heterogeneity: linking spatiotemporal variations in surface temperatures to land-cover and socioeconomic patterns. Landsc Ecol 25(1):17–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chatterjee RS, Fruneau B, Rudant JP, Roy PS, Frison PL, Lakhera RC, Dadhwal VK, Saha R (2006) Subsidence of Kolkata (Calcutta) City, India during the 1990s as observed from space by Differential Synthetic Aperture Radar Interferometry (D-InSAR) technique. Remote Sens Environ 102:176–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chow K, Healey M (2008) Place attachment and place identity: first-year undergraduates making the transition from home to university. J Environ Psychol 28:362–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cotula L, Vermeulen S, Leonard R, Keeley J (2009) Land grab or development opportunity? Agricultural investment and international land deals in Africa. IIED/FAO/IFAD, London. Available at: Accessed on 12 Mar 2018
  14. De B (ed) (1994) 24-Parganas: West Bengal District Gazetteers. State Editor, West Bengal District Gazetteers, KolkataGoogle Scholar
  15. Devine-Wright P (2009) Rethinking NIMBYism. J Community Appl Soc Psychol 19:426–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dey I, Samaddar R, Sen SK (2016) Beyond Kolkata: Rajarhat and the dystopia of urban imagination. Routledge India, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dixon J, Durrheim K (2004) Dislocating identity: desegregation and the transformation of place. J Environ Psychol 24:445–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dossa LH, Abdulkadir A, Amadou H, Sangare S, Schlecht E (2011) Exploring the diversity of urban and peri-urban agricultural systems in Sudano-Sahelian West Africa: an attempt towards a regional typology. Landsc Urban Plan 102(3):197–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Douglas I (2006) Peri-urban ecosystem and societies: transitional zones and contrasting values. In: McGregor D, Simon D, Thompson D (eds) The Peri-urban interface. Earthscan, London, pp 18–29Google Scholar
  20. Farole T, Akinci G (2011) Special economic zones progress: emerging challenges, and future directions. The World Bank, Washington, DCCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fried M (2000) Continuities and discontinuities of place. J Environ Psychol 20:193–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Friedmann J (2016) The future of periurban research. Cities 53:163–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fullilove MT (1996) Psychiatric implications of displacement: contributions from the psychology of place. Am J Psychiatr 153:1516–1523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Galhena DH, Freed R, Maredia KM (2013) Home gardens: a promising approach to enhance household food security and well-being. Agric Food Secur 2:8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Galluzzi G, Eyzaguirre P, Negri V (2010) Home gardens: neglected hotspots of agro-biodiversity and cultural diversity. Biodivers Conserv 19(13):3635–3654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ghosh B et al (2000) New town Calcutta: comprehensive environmental impact assessment and environmental management plan report. GBPL, KolkataGoogle Scholar
  27. Government of India (GOI) (2001) Census of India. Available online: Accessed 20 Mar 2018
  28. Government of India (GOI) (2011) Census of India. Available online: Accessed 20 Mar 2018
  29. Hamari J, Sjöklint M, Ukkonen A (2016) The sharing economy: why people participate in collaborative consumption. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol 67(9):2047–2059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Howard PL (2006) Gender and social dynamics in swidden and homegardens in Latin America. In: Tropical homegardens. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 159–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kamiyama C, Hashimoto S, Kohsaka R, Saito O (2016) Non-market food provisioning services via home gardens and communal sharing in satoyama socio-ecological production landscapes on Japan’s Noto peninsula. Ecosyst Serv 17:185–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lee G, Coward R, Netzer J (1994) Residential differences in filial responsibility expectations among older persons. Rural Sociol 59(1):100–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mohri H, Landreth N, Lahoti S, Saito O et al (2018) Ecosystem services of traditional homegardens in South and Southeast Asia. In: Takeuchi K et al (eds) Resilient Asia. Science for sustainable societies. Springer, Tokyo.. Available at:. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Morton LW, Bitto EA, Oakland MJ, Sand M (2008) Accessing food resources: rural and urban patterns of giving and getting food. Agric Hum Values 25(1):107–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nolin DA (2012) Food-sharing networks in Lamalera, Indonesia: status, sharing, and signaling. Evol Hum Behav 33:334–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Padgham J, Jabbour J, Dietrich K (2015) Managing change and building resilience: a multi-stressor analysis of urban and peri-urban agriculture in Africa and Asia. Urban Clim 12:183–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Paul S (2012) Monitoring urban growth pattern and its impact on neighbouring villages: a case study on Rajarhat region, West Bengal. Int J Curr Res 4(4):221–226Google Scholar
  38. Quang Phuc N, van Westen ACM, Zoomers A (2014) Agricultural land for urban development: the process of land conversion in central Vietnam. Habitat Int 41:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Roy UK (2005) Development of new townships: a catalyst in the growth of rural fringes of Kolkata Metropolitan Area (KMA). Paper presented at the annual conference of HUDCO chair. Available at: Accessed 13 Feb 2017
  40. Roy A (2014) In pursuit of development: land acquisition and the dilution of legal provisions. J Land Rural Stud 2(1):149–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sen S (2011) Effect of urban sprawl on human habitation in urban fringe and peri-urban areas in Kolkata Metropolitan Area. Inst Urban Plan India J 8(4):58–66Google Scholar
  42. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2016) The world’s cities in 2016 – data booklet (ST/ESA/SER.A/392)Google Scholar
  43. Wang L, Kundu R, Chen X (2010) Building for what and whom? New town development as planned suburbanization in China and India. Res Urban Sociol 10:319–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. West Bengal Housing Infrastructure Development Corporation (WBHIDCO) (2000) Master land use plan. Kolkata: WBHIDCO (a government of West Bengal undertaking). Available at: Google Scholar
  45. Winarso H, Hudalah D, Firman T (2015) Peri-urban transformation in the Jakarta metropolitan area. Habitat Int 49:221–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zana Naab F, Dinye RD, Kasanga RK (2013) Urbanization and its impact on agricultural lands in growing cities in developing countries: a case study of Tamale in Ghana. Mod Soc Sci J 2(2):256–287Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mrittika Basu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Osamu Saito
    • 1
  • Shizuka Hashimoto
    • 2
  • Rajarshi Dasgupta
    • 3
  1. 1.United Nations University Institute for the Advanced Study of Sustainability (UNU-IAS)TokyoJapan
  2. 2.Graduate School of Agricultural and Life SciencesThe University of TokyoTokyoJapan
  3. 3.Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES)HayamaJapan

Personalised recommendations