Advertisement

Design of Simulation and Gaming to Promote the Energy Transition from Fossil Fuels to Renewables

Chapter
  • 325 Downloads
Part of the Translational Systems Sciences book series (TSS, volume 18)

Abstract

To design policies for energy transition from fossil fuels to renewables, this study proposes an analytical framework combining simulation and gaming. The aim of this framework is to clarify the effect of subjective recognition by managers of energy companies on the promotion of renewables. Considering the purpose, the authors design a multiplayer computer game dealing with energy supply business in a competitive market. In the gaming experiment, participants play the game and answer some questionnaires during the game. The relationship between the subjective recognition of players, their behavior, and the results of the game is analyzed from the records of the game and questionnaires. The results of preliminary experiments suggest that the pessimistic outlook of players in the earlier stage of game heats up price competition in the market and prevents the promotion of renewables as the players place more emphasis on short-term competition than on long-term investments. The results of preliminary experiments show that the proposed framework can analyze the effect of subjective recognitions of players on the results of the game.

Keywords

Simulation Gaming Energy transition Renewable energy Fossil fuels 

Notes

Acknowledgment

The authors are grateful to Ms. Atsuko Suzuki who developed the prototype of the computer game. We could not have launched this study without her great contributions. The authors are also grateful to Dr. Mizuho Sato from Keio University and Ms. Miki Nakajima from Kansai Economic Federation for organizing the gaming experiments. Further, we appreciate the kind cooperation and suggestions of all participants. This study is financially supported by the Foundation for the Fusion of Science and Technology (FOST).

References

  1. 1.
    International Energy Agency (IEA) (2016) World energy outlook 2016. OECD/IEA, ParisCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    British Petroleum (BP) (2017) Statistical review of world energy 2017, BP website. https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics.html. Last accessed 31 May 2018
  3. 3.
    Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2014) Fifth assessment report, IPCC Website. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/. Last accessed 31 May 2018
  4. 4.
    Tsur Y, Zemel M (2003) Optimal transition to backstop substitutes for nonrenewable re-sources. J Econ Dyn Control 27:551–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gupta SD (2015) Dynamics of switching from polluting resources to green technologies. IJEEP 5(4):1109–1124Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Traber T, Kemfert C (2009) Impact of the German support for renewable energy on electricity prices, emissions, and firms. Energy J 30(3):155–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Doherty R, O’Malley M (2011) The efficiency of Ireland’s Renewable Energy Feed-In Tariff (REFIT) for wind generation. Energy Policy 39:4911–4919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rubin ES, Azevedo IML, Jaramillo P, Yeh S (2015) A review of learning rates for electricity supply technologies. Energy Policy 86:198–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Engineering Mechanics and Energy, Faculty of Engineering, Information and SystemsUniversity of TsukubaIbarakiJapan
  2. 2.College of Engineering SystemsUniversity of TsukubaIbarakiJapan

Personalised recommendations