Taurine 11 pp 239-248 | Cite as

Effects of Taurine on Eusociality of Ants

  • Ha Won Kim
  • Dong Hee LeeEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 1155)


The effects of taurine have been characterized primarily in mammals, and insects are not generally used to study taurine. In this study, ants were used to examine the effect of taurine on eusociality. Ants are the principal models for studying eusociality and superorganisms. Japanese carpenter ants (Camponotus japonicus) were fed a taurine-supplemented diet and tested using ant eusocial indexes. Ant farm structures were constructed using transparent PET bottles containing autoclaved soil. Three categories of vital index were used to study the effect of taurine on group activity: creation of formicaries (residence chambers), cooperative defense efforts, and population density (or group size and composition). Control, low-, and high-taurine diets were prepared using three different levels of taurine in sucrose powder: 0, 5, and 20% (g/g), respectively. The cooperative defense efforts against exogenous queen ants were recorded daily. The high-taurine group took less time to complete their defense formation than the other groups. At least 16% more formicaries (chambers) were observed in the taurine-fed groups than in the control. There were evident differences between control and taurine-fed groups in the total numbers of ants and eggs. The taurine-fed group sustained higher total numbers of ants, excluding the queen. Taurine-fed groups showed a significant increase both in the number of workers and eggs. When fed with taurine, ants responded positively on the eusocial vitality indexes. These results show that taurine exerts a positive effect on the eusociality of ants at the level of the superorganism.


Ants Eusociality Eusocial vital index Superorganism Taurine 



Cooperative Defense Index


polyethylene terephthalate



This work was supported by the 2018 University of Seoul Faculty Grant to DH Lee. The authors appreciate for the financial support.


  1. Billen J (1992) Biology and evolution of social insects (ed.). Leuven University Press, LeuvenGoogle Scholar
  2. Crespi BJ, Yanega D (1995) The definition of eusociality. Behav Ecol 6:109–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Crozier RH, Pamilo P (1996) Evolution of social insect colonies: sex allocation and kin selection. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. de Wilde J, Beetsma J (1982) The physiology of caste development in social insects. Adv Insect Physiol 16:167–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hunt JH (2012) A conceptual model for the origin of worker behaviour and adaptation of eusociality. J Evol Biol 25:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Huxtable RJ (1992) Physiological actions of taurine. Physiol Rev 72:101–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Linksvayer T, Wade MJ (2005) The evolutionary origin and elaboration of sociality in the aculeate Hymenoptera: maternal effects, sib-social effects, and heterochrony. Q Rev Biol 80:317–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. McCusker S, Buff PR, Yu Z, Fascetti AJ (2014) Amino acid content of selected plant, algae and insect species: a search for alternative protein sources for use in pet foods. J Nutri Sci 3:e39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Norman VC, Hughes WHO (2016) Behavioural effects of juvenile hormone and their influence on division of labour in leaf-cutting ant societies. J Exp Biol 219:8–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Nowak MA, Tarnita CE, Wilson EO (2010) The evolution of eusociality. Nature 466:1057–1062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Purcell J, Brelsford A, Wurm Y, Perrin N, Chapuisat M (2014) Convergent genetic architecture underlies social organization in ants. Curr Biol 24:2728–2732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ratnieks FLW, Helantera H (2009) The evolution of extreme altruism and inequality in insect societies. Phil Trans Royal Soc B: Biol Sci 364(1533):3169–3179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rehan SM, Toth AL (2015) Climbing the social ladder: the molecular evolution of sociality. Trend Ecol Evol 30:426–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Robinson GE (1992) Regulation of division of labor in insect societies. Annu Rev Entomol 37:637–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Schaffer S, Takahashi K, Azuma J (2000) Role of osmoregulation in the actions of taurine. Amino Acids 19:527–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Solis JM, Herranz AS, Erreras O, Lerma J, Martin del Rio R (1988) Does taurine act as an osmoregulatory substance in the rat brain? Neurosci Lett 91:53–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Spitze AR, Wong DL, Rogers QR, Fascetti AJ (2003) Taurine concentrations in animal feed ingredients; cooking influences taurine content. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl) 87:251–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Thorne BL, Traniello JFA (2003) Comparative social biology of basal taxa of ants and termites. Annu Rev Entomol 48:377–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Whittle N, Sartori SB, Dlerssen M, Lubec G, Singewald N (2007) Fetal down syndrome brains exhibit aberrant levels of neurotransmitters critical for normal brain development. Pediatrics 120:e1465–e1471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wilson EO, Holldobler B (2005) Eusociality: origin and consequences. PNAS, USA 102:13367–13371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wilson EO, Nowak MA (2014) Natural selection drives the evolution of ant life cycles. PNAS, USA 111(35):12585–12590CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Life SciencesUniversity of SeoulSeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations