Advertisement

Computer-Based Attention Training Improves Brain Cognitive Control Function: Evidences from Event-Related Potentials

  • Lei Zheng
  • Dong-ni Pan
  • Yi Wang
  • Xuebing LiEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 1006)

Abstract

The present study explored the mechanism of attention bias modification (ABM) on Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD). The participants were assigned into training group (attention modification program, AMP) or attention bias holding group (attention control condition, ACC) randomly. To examine the underlying neural mechanism of ABM training, we used the event-related potentials (ERPs) technology and combined with a Stroop task reflecting the function of cognitive control. The behavioral results showed that after attention training, anxiety symptoms were relieved in both groups. The ERP results showed that, in Stroop task, both AMP and ACC group had an increasing N450 and an increasing SP after training, showing an improvement of cognitive control through this long-term repeated training. We also found the reduced P2 amplitudes after AMP training, but not after ACC training, which suggested that ABM training can reduce the early attention resource allocation of the individual to the relevant stimulus. Therefore, computer-based attention training could generally improve the cognitive control function in anxiety individuals, while manipulative training contingency in ABM mainly modulated the early stage of attention processing.

Keywords

Cognitive control Stroop task Attention bias modification training ERP 

References

  1. 1.
    Regier, D.A., Rae, D.S., Narrow, W.E., Kaelber, C.T., Schatzberg, A.F.: Prevalence of anxiety disorders and their comorbidity with mood and addictive disorders. Br. J. Psychiatry 173(34), 24–28 (1998)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beard, C., Sawyer, A.T., Hofmann, S.G.: Efficacy of attention bias modification using threat and appetitive stimuli: a meta-analytic review. Behav. Ther. 43(4), 724–740 (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Amir, N., Beard, C., Burns, M., Bomyea, J.: Attention modification program in individuals with generalized anxiety disorder. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 118(1), 28–33 (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Amir, N., Weber, G., Beard, C., Bomyea, J., Taylor, C.: The effect of a single-session attention modification program on response to a public-speaking challenge in socially anxious individuals. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 117(4), 860–868 (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Amir, N., Taylor, C.T., Donohue, M.C.: Predictors of response to an attention modification program in generalized social phobia. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 81(1), 112 (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brosan, L., Hoppitt, L., Shelfer, L., Sillence, A., Mackintosh, B.: Cognitive bias modification for attention and interpretation reduces trait and state anxiety in anxious patients referred to an out-patient service: results from a pilot study. J. Behav. Ther. Exp. Psychiatry 42(3), 258–264 (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Boettcher, J., Hasselrot, J., Sund, E., Andersson, G., Carlbring, P.: Combining attention training with internet-based cognitive-behavioural self-help for social anxiety: a randomised controlled trial. Cogn. Behav. Ther. 4(1), 1–8 (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Carlbring, P., et al.: Internet-delivered attention bias modification training in individuals with social anxiety disorder - a double blind randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry 12(1), 66 (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Heeren, A., Mogoașe, C., Philippot, P., McNally, R.J.: Attention bias modification for social anxiety: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 40(40), 76–90 (2015)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Neubauer, K., von Auer, M., Murray, E., Petermann, F., Helbig-Lang, S., Gerlach, A.L.: Internet-delivered attention modification training as a treatment for social phobia: a randomized controlled trial. Behav. Res. Ther. 51(2), 87–97 (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bardeer, J.R., Daniel, T.A., Hinnant, J.B., Orcutt, H.K.: Emotion dysregulation and threat-related attention bias variability. Motiv. Emot. 41(3), 1–8 (2017)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pessoa, L.: How do emotion and motivation direct executive control? Trends Cogn. Sci. 13(4), 160–166 (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Braver, T.S.: The variable nature of cognitive control: a dual-mechanisms framework. Trends Cogn. Sci. 16(2), 106–113 (2012)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    West, R., Alain, C.: Effects of task context and fluctuations of attention on neural activity supporting performance of the Stroop task. Brain Res. 873(1), 102–111 (2000)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hanslmayr, S., Pastötter, B., Bäuml, K.H., Gruber, S., Wimber, M., Klimesch, W.: The electrophysiological dynamics of interference during the Stroop task. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 20(2), 215–225 (2008)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Liotti, M., Woldorff, M.G., Perez, R., Mayberg, H.S.: An ERP study of the temporal course of the Stroop color-word interference effect. Neuropsychologia 38(5), 701–711 (2000)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Szűcs, D., Soltész, F., White, S.: Motor conflict in Stroop tasks: direct evidence from single-trial electro-myography and electro-encephalography. Neuroimage 47(4), 1960–1973 (2009)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chuderski, A., Senderecka, M., Kałamała, P., Kroczek, B., Ociepka, M.: ERP correlates of the conflict level in the multi-response Stroop task. Brain Res. 1650, 93–102 (2016)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Larson, M.J., Clayson, P.E., Clawson, A.: Making sense of all the conflict: a theoretical review and critique of conflict-related ERPs. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 93(3), 283–297 (2014)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pires, L., Leitao, J., Guerrini, C., Simoes, M.R.: Event-related brain potentials in the study of inhibition: cognitive control, source localization, and age-related modulations. Neuropsychol. Rev. 24(4), 461–490 (2014)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    O’Donnell, B.F., Swearer, J.M., Smith, L.T., Hokama, H., McCarley, R.W.: A topographic study of ERPs elicited by visual feature discrimination. Brain Topogr. 10(2), 133–143 (1997)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Finke, M., Barceló, F., Garolera, M., Cortinas, M., Garrido, G., Pajares, M.: Impaired preparatory re-mapping of stimulus-response associations and rule-implementation in schizophrenic patients–the role for differences in early processing. Biol. Psychol. 87(3), 358–365 (2011)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schapkin, S.A., Gajewski, P.D., Freude, G.: Age differences in memory-based task switching with and without cues: an ERP study. J. Psychophysiol. 28(3), 187–201 (2014)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Van, E.M., Crajé, C., Beeren, M.E., Steenbergen, B., Schie, H.T., Bekkering, H.: Neural evidence for impaired action selection in right hemiparetic cerebral palsy. Brain Res. 1349(18), 56–67 (2010)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    William, J.M., Mathews, A., Macleod, C.: The emotional Stroop task and psychopathology. Psychol. Bull. 120(1), 3–24 (1996)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ollendick, T., Allen, B., Benoit, K., Cowart, M.: The tripartite model of fear in children with specific phobias: assessing concordance and discordance using the behavioral approach test. Behav. Res. Ther. 49(8), 459–465 (2011)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Schmidt, N.B., Richey, J.A., Buckner, J.D., Timpano, K.R.: Attention training for generalized social anxiety disorder. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 118(1), 5–14 (2011)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Amir, N., Taylor, C.T.: Combining computerized home-based treatments for generalized anxiety disorder: an attention modification program and cognitive behavioral therapy. Behav. Ther. 43(3), 546–559 (2012)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Boettcher, J., et al.: Internet-based attention bias modification for social anxiety: a randomised controlled comparison of training towards negative and training towards positive cues. PLoS ONE 8(9), e71760 (2013)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kuckertz, J.M., Gildebrant, E., Liliequist, B., Karlström, P., Väppling, C., Bodlund, O., et al.: Moderation and mediation of the effect of attention training in social anxiety disorder. Behav. Res. Ther. 53(1), 30–40 (2014)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    O’Toole, L., Dennis, T.A.: Attention training and the threat bias: an ERP study. Brain Cogn. 78(1), 70–73 (2012)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Heeren, A., Raedt, R.D., Koster, E.H.W., Philippot, P.: The (neuro)cognitive mechanisms behind attention bias modification in anxiety: proposals based on theoretical accounts of attentional bias. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 110(3), 119–204 (2013)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kim, S.H., Hamann, S.: Neural correlates of positive and negative emotion regulation. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 19(5), 776–798 (2007)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bertelson, P.: Serial choice reaction-time as a function of response versus signal-and-response repetition. Nature 206(4980), 217–218 (1965)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Henson, R.N., Rugg, M.D.: Neural response suppression, haemodynamic repetition effects, and behavioural priming. Neuropsychologia 41(3), 263–270 (2003)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Milham, M.P., Banich, M.T., Webb, A., Barad, V., Cohen, N.J., Wszalek, T., et al.: The relative involvement of anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex in attentional control depends on nature of conflict. Cogn. Brain. Res. 12(3), 467–473 (2001)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Donohue, S.E., Liotti, M., Perez, R., Woldorff, M.G.: Is conflict monitoring supramodal? Spatiotemporal dynamics of cognitive control processes in an auditory Stroop task. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 12(1), 1–15 (2011)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Gajewski, P.D., Falkenstein, M.: Long-term habitual physical activity is associated with lower distractibility in a Stroop interference task in aging: behavioral and ERP evidence. Brain Cogn. 98, 87–101 (2015)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Suárez-Pellicioni, M., Núñez-Peña, M.I., Colomé, À.: Reactive recruitment of attentional control in math anxiety: an ERP study of numeric conflict monitoring and adaptation. PLoS ONE 9(6), 1476–1491 (2014)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Braver, T.S., Gray, G.R., Burgess, G.C.: Explaining the many varieties of working memory variation: dual mechanisms of cognitive control. In: Variation in Working Memory, pp. 76–106. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Wild-Wall, N., Falkenstein, M., Gajewski, P.D.: Neural correlates of changes in a visual search task due to cognitive training. Neural Plast. 2012(3), 216–225 (2012)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Corbetta, M., Kincade, J.M., Shulman, G.L.: Neural systems for visual orienting and their relationships to spatial working memory. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 14(3), 508–523 (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lei Zheng
    • 1
    • 2
  • Dong-ni Pan
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yi Wang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Xuebing Li
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of PsychologyChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Chinese AcademyBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations