Advertisement

Setup and Safety of Powered TEES

  • Tsukasa ItoEmail author
  • Seiji KakehataEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter will expand on Chap.  2 which focused on powered transcanal endoscopic ear surgery (TEES) by looking at the surgical setup and safety concerns related primarily to powered TEES as well as what was referred to in Chap.  2 as “non-powered TEES.” To reiterate “non-powered TEES” is not a general term used in the literature and is used here to refer to what is typically simply called TEES. Successful TEES, in general, and powered TEES, specifically, requires careful preparation including procuring the proper equipment together with properly positioning and preparing that equipment, the surgical staff, and the patient. The safety issues which also need to be addressed for powered TEES include proper use of the powered instruments within the middle ear, heat generation of light sources, and the potential impact of skull vibrations generated by these powered instruments.

References

  1. 1.
    Pothier DD. Introducing endoscopic ear surgery into practice. Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 2013;46(2):245–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ito T, Kubota T, Takagi A, Watanabe T, Futai K, Furukawa T, Kakehata S. Safety of heat generated by endoscope light sources in simulated transcanal endoscopic ear surgery. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2016;43:501–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ito T. Transcanal endoscopic ear surgery for pediatric population with a narrow external auditory canal. Presented at the 10th International Conference in Cholesteatoma and Ear Surgery, Edinburgh, UK, March 5–8, 2016.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pollack N. Principles of endoscopic ear surgery. In: Pollack N, editor. Endoscopic ear surgery. 1st ed. San Diego: Plural Publishing; 2014. p. 1–18.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wootton C. A practical guide to video and audio compression: from sprockets and rasters to macroblocks. 1st ed. Burlington: Elsevier; 2005. p. 137–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nomura K, Oshima H, Yamauchi D, Hidaka H, Kawase T, Katori Y. Ototoxic effect of Ultrastop antifog solution applied to the guinea pig middle ear. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;151(5):840–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tono T, Sakagami M, Kojima H, et al. Staging and classification criteria for middle ear cholesteatoma proposed by the Japan Otological Society. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2017;44(2):135–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Williams JW, Hodgson WJ. Histologic evaluation of tissues sectioned by ultrasonically powered instruments (a preliminary report). Mt Sinai J Med. 1979;46(2):105–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hodgson WJ, Poddar PK, Mencer EJ, Williams J, Drew M, McElhinney AJ. Evaluation of ultrasonically powered instruments in the laboratory and in the clinical setting. Am J Gastroenterol. 1979;72(2):133–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Epstein F. The cavitron ultrasonic aspirator in tumor surgery. Clin Neurosurg. 1984;31:497–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brock M, Ingwersen I, Roggendorf W. Ultrasonic aspiration in neurosurgery. Neurosurg Rev. 1984;7:173–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chopp RT, Shah BB, Addonizio JC. Use of ultrasonic surgical aspirator in renal surgery. Urology. 1983;12:157–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hadeishi H, Suzuki A, Yasui N, Satou Y. Anterior clinoidectomy and opening of the internal auditory canal using an ultrasonic bone curette. Neurosurgery. 2003;52:867–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pagella F, Giourgos G, Matti E, Colombo A, Carena P. Removal of a fronto-ethmoidal osteoma using the sonopet omni ultrasonic bone curette: first impressions. Laryngoscope. 2008;118:307–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ueki K, Nakagawa K, Marukawa K, Yamamoto E. Le Fort I osteotomy using an ultrasonic bone curette to fracture the pterygoid plates. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2004;32:381–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nakagawa H, Kim SD, Mizuno J, Ohara Y, Ito K. Technical advantages of an ultrasonic bone curette in spinal surgery. J Neurosurg Spine. 2005;2:431–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kakehata S, Watanabe T, Ito T, Kubota T, Furukawa T. Extension of indications for transcanal endoscopic ear surgery using an ultrasonic bone curette for cholesteatomas. Otol Neurotol. 2014;35:101–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tarabichi M. Endoscopic management of acquired cholesteatoma. Am J Otol. 1997;18:544–9.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Presutti L, Marchioni D, Mattioli F, Villari D, Alicandri-Ciufelli M. Endoscopic management of acquired cholesteatoma: our experience. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;37:481–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Marchioni D, Mattioli F, Alicandri-Ciufelli M, Presutti L. Transcanal endoscopic approach to the sinus tympani: a clinical report. Otol Neurotol. 2009;30:758–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    MacKeith SA, Frampton S, Pothier DD. Thermal properties of operative endoscopes used in otorhinolaryngology. J Laryngol Otol. 2008;122:711–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kozin ED, Lehmann A, Carter M, et al. Thermal effects of endoscopy in a human temporal bone model: Implications for endoscopic ear surgery. Laryngoscope. 2014;124:E332–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mitchell S, Coulson C. Endoscopic ear surgery: a hot topic? J Laryngol Otol. 2017;131(2):117–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ito T, Mochizuki H, Watanabe T, Kubota T, Furukawa T, Koike T, et al. Safety of ultrasonic bone curette in ear surgery by measuring skull bone vibrations. Otol Neurotol. 2014;35:e135–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ito T, Kubota T, Furukawa T, et al. The role of powered surgical instruments in ear surgery: an acoustical blessing or a curse? Appl Sci. 2019;9:765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of MedicineYamagata UniversityYamagataJapan

Personalised recommendations