The Red Meat Consumer

  • Joseph William Holloway
  • Jianping Wu


This text is concerned with the biological and ecological sciences that set the stage for red meat production. Before production systems can be organized, the producer must understand the demand for the product to be produced. So, the place to begin in constructing any system of red meat production is the projected consumer of the meat. So, the first chapter in both volumes of this text are focused on the identification and definition of the projected consumer of the meat to be produced. The discussion in Volume I of Beef Science and Production was exhaustive; an overview of that discussion is in this chapter with specific detail given for the intrinsic character of red meat.


  1. Acebron, L.B., and D.C. Dopico. 2000. The importance of intrinsic and extrinsic cues to expected and experienced quality: An empirical application for beef. Food Quality and Preference 11: 229–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albisu, L.M., M. Henchion, P. Leat, and D. Blandford. 2010. Improving agri-food chain relationships in Europe: The role of public policy. In Agri-food chain relationships, ed. C. Fischer and M. Hartmann, 250–266. Wallingford: CAB Int’l.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Banovic, M., K.G. Grunert, M.M. Barriera, and M.A. Fontes. 2009. Beef quality perception at the point of purchase: A study from Portugal Food Qual. Pref 20: 335–342.Google Scholar
  4. Black, C., O.P. Chevalier, and C.T. Elliott. 2016. The current and potential applications of ambient mass spectrometry in detecting food fraud. Trends in Analytical Chemistry 82: 268–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carpenter, C.E., D.P. Cornforth, and D. Whittier. 2001. Consumer preferences for beef color and packaging did not affect eating satisfaction. Meat Science 57: 359–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dıez, J., J.J. Del Coz, A. Bahamonde, C. Sanudo, J.L. Olleta, S. Macie, M.M. Campo, B. Panea, and P. Albertı. 2006. Identifying market segments in beef: Breed, slaughter weight and aging time implications. Meat Science 74: 667–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Font-i-Furnols, M., and Luis Guerrero. 2014. Consumer preference, behavior and perception about meat and meat products: An overview. Meat Science 98: 361–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Henchion, M., M. McCarthy, V. Resconi, and D. Troy. 2014. Meat consumption: Trends quality matters. Meat Science 98: 561–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Henchion, M., M. McCarthy, and V.C. Resconi. 2017. Beef quality attributes: A systematic review of consumer perspectives. Meat Science 128: 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hocquette, J.F., L. Van Wezemael, S. Chriki, I. Legrand, W. Verbeke, L. Farmer, N.D. Scollan, R. Polkinghorne, R. Rødbotteni, P. Allen, and D.W. Pethick. 2014. Modelling of beef sensory quality for a better prediction of palatability. Meat Science 97: 316–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Killinger, K.M., C.R. Calkins, W.J. Umberger, D.M. Feuz, and K.M. Eskridge. 2004a. Consumer visual preference and value for beef steaks differing in marbling level and color. Journal of Animal Science 82: 3288–3293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. ———. 2004b. Consumer sensory acceptance and value for beef steaks of similar tenderness, but differing in marbling level. Journal of Animal Science 82: 3294–3301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. ———. 2004c. A comparison of consumer sensory acceptance and value of domestic beef steaks and steaks from a branded, Argentine beef program. Journal of Animal Science 82: 3302–3307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Koohmaraie, M., and G.H. Geesink. 2006. Contribution of postmortemmuscle biochemistry to the delivery of consistent meat quality with particular focus on the calpain system. Meat Science 74: 34–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mullen, A.M., P.C. Stapleton, D. Corcoran, R.M. Hamill, and A. White. 2006. Understanding meat quality through the application of genomic and proteomic approaches. Meat Science 74: 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pethick, D.W., A.J. Ball, R.G. Banks, and J.F. Hocquette. 2011. Current and future issues facing red meat quality in a competitive market and how to manage continuous improvement. Animal Production Science 51: 13–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Polkinghorne, R., R. Watson, M. Porter, A. Gee, J. Scott, and J. Thompson. 1999. Meat Standards Australia, A ’PACCP’ based beef grading scheme for consumers. (1) The use of consumer scores to set grade standards. 45th Internaltional Congress Meat Science and Technology Yokohama, Japan 45: 14–15.Google Scholar
  18. Swatland, H.J. 2010. Review: Meat products and consumption culture in the West. Meat Science 86: 80–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Verbeke, W., and I. Vackier. 2004. Profile and effects of consumer involvement in fresh meat. Meat Science 67: 159–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Webber, J.J., B. Dobrenov, J. Lloyd, and D. Jordan. 2012. Meat inspection in the Australian red-meat industries: Past, present and future. Australian Veterinary Journal 90: 363–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. and Science Press 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joseph William Holloway
    • 1
  • Jianping Wu
    • 2
  1. 1.Animal ScienceTexas A&M UniversityUvaldeUSA
  2. 2.Gansu Academy of Agricultural SciencesLanzhouChina

Personalised recommendations