The Red Meat Consumer

  • Joseph William Holloway
  • Jianping Wu


Food production can be thought of as a stream whose headwater is in the soil and sun, altering in character as it grows downstream to its “mouth,” the consumer. The path of least resistance is for the traveler (food producer) to begin at the headwater and “go with the flow” downstream to the mouth. That is the primary journey followed by generations of red meat producers, considering primarily what can be done with the resources available with only an afterthought about what the “mouth” wants. Red Meat Science and Production takes the opposite trip, swimming upstream against the current working backward from the mouth to the source. Therefore, the first chapter in each volume concerns the market. The market is a complex entity, having internal variation (each consumer may desire a different eating experience than others) and dynamic over time (although rooted in tradition, always evolving). This chapter is a review of the literature focused on the consumer exploring his/her motives, desires, and distastes. This chapter also discusses how to translate what the consumer desires in an eating experience into characteristics of food, specifically red meat. The orientation is that the production is not just of food but of an eating experience.


  1. Acebron, L.B., and D.C. Dopico. 2000. The importance of intrinsic and extrinsic cues to expected and experienced quality: An empirical application for beef. Food Quality and Preference 11: 229–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aiello, L.C., and P. Wheeler. 1995. The expensive-tissue hypothesis: The brain and the digestive system in human and primate evolution. Current Anthropology 36: 199–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Albisu, L.M., M. Henchion, P. Leat, and D. Blandford. 2010. Improving agri-food chain relationships in Europe: The role of public policy. In Agri-food chain relationships, ed. C. Fischer and M. Hartmann, 250–266. Wallingford: CAB International.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Banovic, M., K.G. Grunert, M.M. Barriera, and M.A. Fontes. 2009. Beef quality perception at the point of purchase: A study from Portugal. Food Quality and Preference 20: 335–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barendse, W.J. 2014. Should animal fats be back on the table? A critical review of the human health effects of animal fat. Animal Production Science 54: 831–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bernabéu, R., and A. Tendero. 2005. Preference structure for lamb meat consumers. A Spanish case study. Meat Science 71: 464–470.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bernués, A., A. Olaizola, and K. Corcoran. 2003b. Labeling information demanded by European consumers and relationships with purchasing motives, quality and safety of meat. Meat Science 65: 1095–1106.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Black, C., O.P. Chevalier, and C.T. Elliott. 2016. The current and potential applications of ambient mass spectrometry in detecting food fraud. Trends in Analytical Chemistry 82: 268–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carpenter, C.E., D.P. Cornforth, and D. Whittier. 2001. Consumer preferences for beef color and packaging did not affect eating satisfaction. Meat Science 57: 359–363.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cohen, W., R. Shapire, and Y. Singer. 1999. Learning to order things. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 10: 243–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dagevos, H., and J. Voordouw. 2013. Sustainability and meat consumption: Is reduction realistic. Sustainability Science, Practice, and Policy 9: 60–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dalen, A.G. 1996. Assuring eating quality of meat. Meat Science 43: 21–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. De Backer, C.J.S., and L. Hudders. 2015. Meat morals: Relationship between meat consumption consumer attitudes towards human and animal welfare and moral behavior. Meat Science 99: 68–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Del Coz, J.J., G.F. Bayon, J. Dıez, O. Luaces, A. Bahamonde, and C. Sanudo. 2004. Trait selection for assessing beef meat quality using non-linear SVM. In Proceedings 18th annual conference on neural information processing systems. (NIPS 2004), 321–328. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.Google Scholar
  15. Dietz, T., A.S. Frisch, L. Kalof, P.C. Stern, and G.A. Guagnano. 1995. Values and vegetarianism: An exploratory analysis. Rural Society 60: 533–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Diez, J., A. Bahamonde, J. Alonso, S. Lopez, J.J. Del Coz, J. Quevedo, et al. 2003. Artificial intelligence techniques point out differences in classification performance between light and standard bovine carcasses. Meat Science 64: 249–258.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Diez, J., J.J. Del Coz, A. Bahamonde, C. Sanudo, J.L. Olleta, S. Macie, M.M. Campo, B. Panea, and P. Albertı. 2006. Identifying market segments in beef: Breed, slaughter weight and aging time implications. Meat Science 74: 667–675.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dransfield, E. 2005. Consumer importance in creating demands for meat and meat product safety. Tehnologija Mesa 46: 3–10.Google Scholar
  19. Egan, A.F., D.M. Ferguson, and J.M. Thompson. 2001. Consumer sensory requirements for beef and their implications for the Australian beef industry. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 41: 855–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. EI. 2010. Halal drives fresh meat growth, but in adequate supply remains an issue. Euromonitor Intl. Available at Accessed 4 Jan 2013.
  21. Eng, C.M., D.E. Lieberman, K.D. Zink, and M.A. Peters. 2013. Bite force and occlusal stress production in hominin evolution. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 151: 544–557.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Farouk, M.M. 2012. New Zealand meat industry must optimise halal market opportunities. NZ Food Technology 47: 9.Google Scholar
  23. ———. 2013. Review. Advances in the industrial production of Halal and Kosher red meat. Meat Science 95: 805–820.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Filippi, M., G. Riccitelli, A. Falini, F. Di Salle, P. Vuilleumier, G. Comi, and M.A. Rocca. 2010. The brain functional networks associated to human and animal suffering differ among omnivores, vegetarians and vegans. PLoS One 5: e10847.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fiske, S.T., A.J. Cuddy, and P. Glick. 2007. Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11: 77–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Font-i-Furnols, M., and Luis Guerrero. 2014. Consumer preference, behavior and perception about meat and meat products: An overview. Meat Science 98: 361–371.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Forestell, C.A., A.M. Spaeth, and S.A. Kane. 2012. To eat or not to eat red meat. A closer look at the relationship between restrained eating and vegetarianism in college females. Appetite 58: 319–325.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fox, N., and K. Ward. 2008. Health, ethics and environment: A qualitative study of vegetarian motivations. Appetite 50: 422–429.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Furness, J.B., J.J. Cottrell, and D.M. Bravo. 2015. Comparative Gut Physiology Symposium: Comparative physiology of digestion. Journal of Animal Science 93: 485–491.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gong, S.L., Y.S. Yang, H. Shen, X.Y. Wang, H.P. Guo, and L. Bai. 2011. Meat handling practices in households of mainland China. Food Control 22: 749–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gracia, A., and T. de-Magistris. 2013. Preferences for lamb meat: A choice experiment for Spanish consumers. Meat Science 95: 396–402.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Graham, J., J. Haidt, and B.A. Nosek. 2009. Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 96: 1029–1046.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Greene-Finestone, L.S., M.K. Campbell, S.E. Evers, and I.A. Gutmanis. 2008. Attitudes and health behaviours of young adolescent omnivores and vegetarians: A schoolbased study. Appetite 51: 104–110.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Grunert, K.G. 2006. Future trends and consumer lifestyles with regard to meat consumption. Meat Science 74: 149–160.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Grunert, K.G., L. Bredahl, and K. Brunso. 2004. Consumer perception of meat quality and implications for product development in the meat sector — A review. Meat Science 66: 259–272.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Grunert, K.G., W. Verbeke, J.O. Kugler, F. Saeed, and J. Scholderer. 2011. Use of consumer insight in the new product development process in the meat sector. Meat Science 89: 251–258.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Han, Y. 2011b. The trend of meat product industry and market in 2011 in China. Meat Industry 358: 1–4.Google Scholar
  38. Henchion, M., M. McCarthy, V. Resconi, and D. Troy. 2014. Meat consumption: Trends quality matters. Meat Science 98: 561–568.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Henchion, M., M. McCarthy, and V.C. Resconi. 2017. Beef quality attributes: A systematic review of consumer perspectives. Meat Science 128: 1–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hersleth, M., T. Naes, M. Rødbotten, and E. Monteleone. 2012. Lamb meat - Importance of origin and grazing system for Italian and Norwegian consumers. Meat Science 90: 899–907.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hocquette, J.F., R. Botreau, B. Picard, A. Jacquet, D.W. Pethick, and N.D. Scollan. 2012a. Opportunities for predicting and manipulating beef quality. Meat Science 92: 197–209.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hocquette, J.F., C. Capel, V. David, D. Guéméné, J. Bidanel, C. Ponsart, P.L. Gastinel, P.Y. Le Bail, P. Monget, P. Mormède, M. Barbezant, F. Guillou, and J.L. Peyraud. 2012b. Objectives and applications of phenotyping network setup for livestock. Journal of Animal Science 83: 517–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hocquette, J.F., L. Van Wezemael, S. Chriki, I. Legrand, W. Verbeke, L. Farmer, N.D. Scollan, R. Polkinghorne, R. Rødbotteni, P. Allen, and D.W. Pethick. 2014. Modelling of beef sensory quality for a better prediction of palatability. Meat Science 97: 316–322.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hoek, A.C., P.A. Luning, A. Stafleu, and C. de Graaf. 2004. Food-related lifestyle and health attitudes of Dutch vegetarians, non-vegetarian consumers of meat substitutes, and meat consumers. Appetite 42: 265–272.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Johnson, R. 2014. Food fraud and economically motivated adulteration of food and food ingredients. The Congressional Research Service. Available at Accessed 23 June 2016.
  46. Kalof, L., T. Dietz, P.C. Stern, and G.A. Guagnano. 1999. Social psychological and structural influences on vegetarian beliefs. Rural Sociology 64: 500–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Killinger, K.M., C.R. Calkins, W.J. Umberger, D.M. Feuz, and K.M. Eskridge. 2004a. Consumer visual preference and value for beef steaks differing in marbling level and color. Journal of Animal Science 82: 3288–3293.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. ———. 2004b. Consumer sensory acceptance and value for beef steaks of similar tenderness, but differing in marbling level. Journal of Animal Science 82: 3294–3301.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. ———. 2004c. A comparison of consumer sensory acceptance and value of domestic beef steaks and steaks from a branded, Argentine beef program. Journal of Animal Science 82: 3302–3307.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kim, K.S., M.J. Kim, S.J. Ahn, S.Y. Lee, and K.S. Han. 1999. Food and food culture. Seoul: Kyomoonsa.Google Scholar
  51. Kittler, P.G., and K.P. Sucher. 2001. Food and culture. Belmont/Wadsworth: Thomson Learning.Google Scholar
  52. Koo, S.J., and H.S. Kim. 2005. Cultural foods in the world, 1–48, 74–75. Paju: Kyomoonsa.Google Scholar
  53. Koo, N.S., S.J. Kwon, K.A. Lee, and S.Y. Ly. 2008. Food and culture in the world, 1–11. Paju: Kyomoonsa.Google Scholar
  54. Koohmaraie, M., and G.H. Geesink. 2006. Contribution of postmortemmuscle biochemistry to the delivery of consistent meat quality with particular focus on the calpain system. Meat Science 74: 34–43.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Latvala, T., M. Niva, J. Makela, E. Pouta, J. Heikillä, J. Kotro, and S. Forsman-Hugg. 2012. Diversifying meat consumption patterns: Consumers’ self-reported past behavior and intentions for change. Meat Science 92: 71–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lea, E., and A. Worsley. 2003. Benefits and barriers to the consumption of a vegetarian diet in Australia. Public Health Nutrition 6: 505–511.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Leonard, W.R., J.J. Snodgrass, and M.L. Robertson. 2007. Effects of brain evolution on human nutrition and metabolism. Annual Review of Nutrition 27: 311–327.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Li, J. 2005. The modernization review on traditional Chinese meat products. Food Science 26: 247–251.Google Scholar
  59. Li, L.T., L.J. Yin, and M. Saito. 2004. Function of traditional foods and food culture in China. Japan Agricultural Research Quarterly 38: 213–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Liu, H., and D. Sun. 2010. China pork consumption situation and outlook. Agricultural Outlook 52: 35–38.Google Scholar
  61. Liu, L., D.Q. Zhang, and Z.F. He. 2008. Research progress of the preservation technology of processed meat products. Meat Research 111: 3–9.Google Scholar
  62. Luaces, O., G.F. Bayon, J.R. Quevedo, J. Dıez, J.J. Del Coz, and A. Bahamonde. 2004. Analysing sensory data using non-linear preference learning with feature subset selection. In Proceedings of the 15th European Conference Machine Learning (ECML 04), Pisa, Italia, 286–297Google Scholar
  63. Meng, B., X. Wang, J. Zhang, H. Wang, H. Zhang, and W. Jiang. 2011. Development trend of meat product in China. Meat Industry 364: 6–8.Google Scholar
  64. Miele, M., and A. Evans. 2010. When foods become animals, ruminations on ethics and responsibility in care-full spaces of consumption. Ethics, Policy & Environment 13: 171–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Milton, K. 2003. The critical role played by animal source foods in human (Homo) evolution. The Journal of Nutrition 133: 3886S–3892S.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Milton, K., and M.W. Demment. 1988. Digestion and passage kinetics of chimpanzees fed high and low fiber diets and comparison with human data. The Journal of Nutrition 118: 1082–1088.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Mintel. 2009. 3 in 5 kosher food buyers purchase for food quality, not religion. Mintel Oxygen Report. Available at Accessed 5 Feb 2013.
  68. Miranda-de la Lama, G.C. 2013. Transport and pre-slaughter logistics: Definitions and current tendencies in animal welfare and meat quality. Veterinaria Mexico 44: 31–56.Google Scholar
  69. Monson, F., C. Sanudo, and I. Sierra. 2005. Influence of breed and aging time on the sensory meat quality and consumer acceptability in intensively reared beef. Meat Science 71: 471–479.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Morales, L.E., G. Griffith, V. Wright, E. Fleming, W. Umberger, and N. Hoang. 2013. Variables affecting the propensity to buy branded beef among groups of Australian beef buyers. Meat Science 94: 239–246.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Mullen, A.M., P.C. Stapleton, D. Corcoran, R.M. Hamill, and A. White. 2006. Understanding meat quality through the application of genomic and proteomic approaches. Meat Science 74: 3–16.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Nam, K.C., C. Jo, and M. Lee. 2010. Review: Meat products and consumption culture in the East. Meat Science 86: 95–102.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Ngapo, T., J. Martin, and E. Dranfield. 2004. Consumer choices of pork chops: Results from 3 panels in France. Food Quality and Preference 15: 349–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Oude Ophuis, P.A.M., and H.C.M. Van Trijp. 1995. Perceived quality: Amarket driven and consumer oriented approach. Food Quality and Preference 6: 177–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Park, K.S., W.S. Jeong, Y.J. Shin, E.S. Kim, H.H. Kim, H.S. Cheong, et al. 2007. World food and food consumption culture. Seoul: Hyoil Book Co.Google Scholar
  76. Pethick, D.W., A.J. Ball, R.G. Banks, and J.F. Hocquette. 2011. Current and future issues facing red meat quality in a competitive market and how to manage continuous improvement. Animal Production Science 51: 13–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Polkinghorne, R., R. Watson, M. Porter, A. Gee, J. Scott, and J. Thompson. 1999. Meat Standards Australia, A ‘PACCP’ based beef grading scheme for consumers. 1) The use of consumer scores to set grade standards. 45th international congress of meat science technology. Yokohama, Japan 45:14–15.Google Scholar
  78. Realini, C.E., M. Font i Furnols, F. Sañudo, C. Montossi, M.A. Oliver, and L. Guerrero. 2013. Spanish, French and British consumers’ acceptability of Uruguayan beef, and consumers’ beef choice associated with country of origin, finishing diet and meat price. Meat Science 95:14–21.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Regenstein, J.M., M.M. Chaudry, and C.E. Regenstein. 2003. The kosher and halal food laws. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety 2: 111–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Richardson, N.J., H.J.H. MacFie, and R. Shepherd. 1994. Consumer attitudes to meat eating. Meat Science 36: 57–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Rozin, P., M. Markwith, and C. Stoess. 1997. Moralization and becoming a vegetarian: The transformation of preferences into values and the recruitment of disgust. Psychological Science 8: 67–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Ruby, M.B. 2012. Vegetarianism. A blossoming field of study. Appetite 58: 141–150.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Shawe-Taylor, J., and N. Cristianini. 2004. Kernel methods for pattern analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Shimp, T., and S. Sharma. 1987. Consumer ethnocentrism: Construction and validation of the CETSCALE. Journal of Marketing Research 24: 280–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Silverman, A. 2012. The global Jewish population reached 13.75 million in 2011. Available at Accessed 4 Feb 2013.
  86. Steenkamp, J.B. 1990. Conceptual model of the quality perception process. Journal of Business Research 21: 309–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Stevens, C.E., and I.D. Hume. 1998. Contributions of microbes in vertebrate gastrointestinal tract to production and conservation of nutrients. Physiological Reviews 78: 393–427.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Sunkar, I. 2008. The global halal trade, trends and issues. Halal Journal: 32–34.Google Scholar
  89. Swatland, H.J. 2010. Review: Meat products and consumption culture in the West. Meat Science 86: 80–85.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Tobler, C., V.H. Visschers, and M. Siegrist. 2011. Eating green. Consumers’ willingness to adopt ecological food consumption behaviors. Appetite 57: 674–682.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Troy, D.J., and J.P. Kerry. 2010. Consumer perception and the role of science in the meat industry. Meat Science 86: 214–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Van Wezemael, L., S. De Smet, Ø. Ueland, and W. Verbeke. 2014. Relationships between sensory evaluations of beef tenderness, shear force measurements and consumer characteristics. Meat Science 97: 310–315.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Vanhonacker, F., E.J. Van Loo, X. Gellynck, and W. Verbeke. 2013. Flemish consumer attitudes towards more sustainable food choices. Appetite 62: 7–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Verbeke, W., and I. Vackier. 2004. Profile and effects of consumer involvement in fresh meat. Meat Science 67: 159–168.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Verbeke, W., and J. Viaene. 1999. Beliefs, attitude and behaviour towards fresh meat consumption in Belgium: Empirical evidence from a consumer survey. Food Quality and Preference 10: 437–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Verbeke, W., L. Van Wezemael, M.D. de Barcellos, J.O. Kugler, J.F. Hocquette, O. Ueland, and K.G. Grunert. 2010. European beef consumers’ interest in a beef eating-quality guarantee. Insights from a qualitative study in four EU countries. Appetite 54: 289–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Wahlqvist, M.L., and M.S. Lee. 2007. Regional food culture and development. Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition 16: 2–7.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  98. Weaver, T.D. 2012. Did a discrete event 200,000–100,000 years ago produce modern humans? Journal of Human Evolution 63: 121–126.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Webber, J.J., B. Dobrenov, J. Lloyd, and D. Jordan. 2012. Meat inspection in the Australian red-meat industries: Past, present and future. Australian Veterinary Journal 90: 363–369.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Wrangham, R., and N. Conklin-Brittain. 2003. Cooking as a biological trait. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology. A, Comparative Physiology 136: 35–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Yong, C.K., K. Eskridge, C. Calkins, and W.J. Umberger. 2010. Assessing consumer preferences for rib-eye steak characteristics using confounded factorial conjoint choice experiments. Journal of Muscle Foods 21: 224–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Zhou, G., W. Zhang, and X. Xu. 2012. Review: China’s meat industry revolution: Challenges and opportunities for the future. Meat Science 92: 188–196.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. and Science Press 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joseph William Holloway
    • 1
  • Jianping Wu
    • 2
  1. 1.Animal ScienceTexas A&M UniversityUvaldeUSA
  2. 2.Gansu Academy of Agricultural SciencesLanzhouChina

Personalised recommendations