Advertisement

Fundamental Energy Needs Quantification for QoL Improvement

  • Reza NadimiEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Previous chapters conducted energy analysis in terms of the proposed QoL indicator at international level. Moreover, the analysis of Chap.  3 revealed that QoL will increase three times if final energy consumption per capita reaches to 548 kgoe. Additionally, poverty rate decreases around three times through supplying same final energy for each person in pre-developing countries. Energy consumption at family level is the scope of current chapter, to measure fundamental energy needs (FENs). Then, it will investigate to what extent FENs reduces final energy consumption. In other word, the share of FENs in energy poverty reduction is considered. The proposed method is based on time use analysis which is independent from place and families. Thus, the proposed method can be conducted in different countries and different families to extend the results. Measuring FENs across households provides an insight into the poor households’ energy needs and energy poverty reduction. Household’s fundamental energy needs consists of energy for heating, cooling, cooking, and lighting services, which vary from one country to another. This chapter proposes the time use analysis to figure out energy consumption among households, while the “power” side of energy is assumed as an exogenous variable (Energy = Time × Power). A set of household activities related to a family with two persons is selected and their corresponding cycle times and frequencies are modeled by different statistical distributions due to the intrinsic uncertainty of cycle times. Then, a simulation model is created to extract robust results related to the household energy consumption based on the whole set of activities, weather data and selected statistical distributions. For the aforementioned family, the results of simulation showed that on average, the daily FENs is 63.3 MJ; while its highest share belongs to the cooking activities (39.2%), followed by heating (23.6%), cooling (18.3%), and lighting (5.2%). The results of chapter emphasize the importance of heating, cooking, and cooling services for poverty reduction at the household level than lighting service.

Keywords

Time use analysis Residential energy consumption Energy poverty Bottom-up simulation model 

Bibliography

  1. 1.
    P. Action, Poor People’s Energy Outlook 2010 (Rugby, UK, 2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    UNDP, World Energy Assessment: Energy and the Challenge of Sustainability (United Nations Development Programme, New York, 2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    C.C. Lauren, The Stanford Natural Gas Initiative Framework for Understanding the Role for Natural Gas in Reducing Energy Poverty (Stanford University, CA, 2017)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. González-Eguino, Energy poverty: An overview. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 47, 377–385 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    UN, Practical Action: Policy and Practice_Total Energy Access, United Nations, [Online]. Available https://policy.practicalaction.org/policy-themes/energy/total-energy-access. Accessed 10 2017
  6. 6.
    S. Groh, S. Pachauri, R. Narasimha, What are we measuring? An empirical analysis of household electricity access metrics in rural Bangladesh. Energy. Sustain. Dev. 30, 21–31 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    T. Sanchez, The Hidden Energy Crisis: How Policies are Failing the World’s Poor (Practical Action Publication, 2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. Pachauri, Reaching an international consensus on defining modern energy access. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 3, 235–240 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    U. Nations, Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (sustainabledevelopment.un.org, 2015)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    R. Nadimi, K. Tokimatsu, Modeling of quality of life in terms of energy and electricity consumption. Appl. Energy 212, 1282–1294 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    R. Nadimi, K. Tokimatsu, Energy use analysis in the presence of quality of life, poverty, health. Energy 19, 657–663 (2018)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    R. Nadimi, K. Tokimatsu, Renewable Energy Substitution Model and Environment Saving Preservation (Technologies and Eco-innovation towards Sustainability II, Springer Nature Singapore, 2019)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    R. Nadimi, K. Tokimatsu, Potential energy saving via overall efficiency relying on quality of life. Appl. Energy 233–234, 283–299 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    P. Nussbaumer, M. Bazilian, V. Modi, Measuring energy poverty: Focusing on what matters. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 16, 231–243 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    E. S. M. A. P. (ESMAP), Beyond Connections Energy Access Redefined (World Bank, Washington DC 20433, 2015)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    R. Nadimi, K. Tokimatsu, in 10th International Conference on Applied Energy (ICAE2018). Fundamental energy needs quantification across poor households through simulation model (Hong Kong, China (under publication), 2018)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    L.C. Culver, Energy Poverty: What You Measure Matters (Stanford University, California, 2017)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    H. Shakouri, R. Nadimi, S.F. Ghaderi, A hybrid TSK-FR model to study short-term variations of the electricity demand versus the temperature changes. Expert Syst. Appl. 36, 1765–1772 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    L.T. Jr., A note on understanding cycle time. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 205, 113–117 (2018)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    ASHRAE Handbook Fundamentals, Atlanta: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (Inc., 2009)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    CIBSE, Degree-days: Theory and application (2006). [Online]. Available https://www.cibse.org/Knowledge/knowledge-items/detail?id=a0q20000008I73TAAS. Accessed 1 June 2018
  22. 22.
    S. Guillén-Lambea, B. Rodríguez-Soria, J.M. Marín, Comfort settings and energy demand for residential nZEB in warm climates. Appl. Energy 202, 471–486 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    S. Purcell, Maximum Likelihood Estimation (20 05 2007). [Online]. Available http://statgen.iop.kcl.ac.uk/bgim/mle/sslike_1.html. Accessed 3 June 2018
  24. 24.
    G. Marsaglia, Evaluating the Anderson-Darling distribution. J. Stat. Softw. 9(2), 730–737 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Y. Yamaguchi, Y. Shimoda, in the 2nd Asia Conference of International Building Performance Simulation Association. Behavior Model of Occupants in Home based on Japanese National Time Use Survey (Nagoya, Japan, 2014)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    D.J. Zube, Heat Transfer efficiency of biomass cookstoves (2010). [Online]. Available https://dspace.library.colostate.edu/bitstream/handle/10217/39344/2010_Summer_Zube_Daniel.pdf?sequence=1. Accessed 05 June 2018
  27. 27.
    M. Bryden, D. Still, P. Scott, G. Hoffa, D. Ogle, R. Bailis, K. Goyer, Design Principles for Wood Burning Cook Stoves (Aprovecho Research Center—Advanced Studies in Appropriate Technology, 2010)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    L. Gattei, A Study on the Fluid Dynamics of Domestic Gas Burners (University of Bologna, 2008)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    K.K. Prasad, B. Frederiks, W. Floor, CookStove.net, BTG biomass technology group B.V. & The World Bank Group, [Online]. Available http://www.cookstove.net/needs/power.html. Accessed 8 June 2018
  30. 30.
    Power Calculation, © Power-Calculation.com, [Online]. Available http://www.power-calculation.com/hot-water-heater-cost-energy-consumption.php. Accessed 8 June 2018
  31. 31.
    G. S. O. R. Center, AccuWeather, Global Sales Office Rockefeller Center New York, NY, [Online]. Available https://www.accuweather.com/en/jp/machida-shi. Accessed 8 July 2018
  32. 32.
    BizzEE, BizzEE Degree Days Weather Data for Energy Professionals, Degree Days.net, [Online]. Available https://www.degreedays.net/. Accessed 8 July 2018
  33. 33.
    Timeanddate, @timeanddate.com, [Online]. Available https://www.timeanddate.com/sun/japan/tokyo. Accessed 8 July 2018
  34. 34.
    R.J. Aristizabal, Estimating the Parameters of the Three-Parameter Lognormal Distribution (2012)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    CORONA, Kerosene Fan Heater FH-2506, CORONA Japan, [Online]. Available https://www.corona.co.jp/en/products/fh2506.html. Accessed 2 June 2018
  36. 36.
    CIBSE, Hydronic system design, [Online]. Available www.cibse.org/getmedia/76229a96-c37e-4d2f-b4f9…/Guide-B1-appendix.pdf.aspx. Accessed 12 June 2018
  37. 37.
    A. S. f. P. Engineering, Domestic Water Systems, [Online]. Available https://aspe.org/sites/default/files/CPD_review_2015_Chapter6_errata.pdf. Accessed 12 June 2018
  38. 38.
    K. Brozyna, A. Rapport, Measure Guideline: Transitioning to a Tankless Water Heater (U.S. Department of Energy, 2012)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    H. Hendrickx, People’s showering habits revealed in survey, UK sustainable shower study_BBC, UK (2011)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    e-Stat, Survey on Time Use and Leisure Activities, Japanese Government Statistics, 2016. [Online]. Available http://www.stat.go.jp/english/data/shakai/index.html. Accessed 8 July 2018
  41. 41.
    S. Baurzhan, G.P. Jenkins, Off-grid solar PV: Is it an affordable or appropriate solution for rural electrification in Sub-Saharan African countries? Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 60, 1405–1418 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    C.L. Azimoh, P. Klintenberg, F. Wallin, B. Karlsson, C. Mbohwa, Electricity for development: Mini-grid solution for rural electrification in South Africa. Energy Convers. Manag. 110, 268–277 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    H. Ahlborg, L. Hammar, Drivers and barriers to rural electrification in Tanzania and Mozambique e Grid-extension, off-grid, and renewable energy technologies. Renew. Energy 61, 117–124 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    R.J. Aristizabal, Estimating the Parameters of the Three-Parameter Lognormal Distribution (Florida International University Digital Commons, Florida, USA, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Risk Analysis and Simulation Add-In for Microsoft® Excel (Palisade Corporation, NY USA, 2016)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    I. Basak, N. Balakrishnan, Estimation for the three-parameter gamma distribution based on progressively censored data. Stat. Methodol. 9, 305–319 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    C.C. Kokonendji, S.S. Zocchi, Extensions of discrete triangular distributions and boundary bias in kernel estimation for discrete functions. Stat. Probab. Lett. 80, 1655–1662 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    R.J. Beckman, G.L. Tiet jen, Maximum likelihood estimation for the beta distribution. J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 7, 253–258 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    N.C. Sagias, G.K. Karagiannidis, Gaussian class multivariate Weibull distributions: Theory and applications in fading channels. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 51(10), 3608–3619 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    G.R. Shorack, J.A. Wellner, Empirical Processes with Applications to Statistics (Wiley, New York, 1986)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    S. Kotz, S. Nadarajah, Extreme Value Distributions: Theory and Applications (World Scientific Publishing Company, 2001)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    T. Sanchez, A. Scott, Energy poverty: The hidden energy crisis, 2010. [Online]. Available www.practicalaction.org. Accessed 10 2017
  53. 53.
    e. pdf_giz, Productive Use of Energy—PRODUSE A Manual for Electrification Practitioners (Eschborn, 2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tokyo Institute of TechnologyTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations