Formation Mechanism and Psychological Effect of Social Mentality

  • Yiyin Yang
Part of the Research Series on the Chinese Dream and China’s Development Path book series (RSCDCDP)


As the most macroscopic and complicated social mental phenomenon, social mentality is surely quite complicated in its formation mechanism as well. As previously mentioned, in this book, we apply a perspective that is different from that of the “individual in the group” and the “group in the individual”—namely, the perspective of the mutual construction between “individual and group”. This perspective will help us to uncover the internal mechanism of such a macroscopic and complicated phenomenon, and able us to develop a theory to describe and explain more systematically the formation of social mentality and changes it undergoes.


Chinese-Language Sources

  1. Doise, W. (2011). Levels of explanation in social psychology (M. Zhao, & B. Z. Liu, Trans.). Beijing: China Renmin University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Li, H. & Zhang, H. (2013) Social identity prominence: A review of studies from self-reference effect to group reference effect. Journal of Xihua University (Philosophy & Social Sciences), 32(2), 52–59.Google Scholar
  3. Yang, Y. (2012). Difference comparison of group identification capability and its relations with cognitive style and subjective well-being under eastern and western cultures. Doctoral Dissertation of School of Psychology, Beijing Normal University.Google Scholar
  4. Zhang, Y. (2012). Research on the psychological harmony intermediary mechanism of college teachers’ professional well-being. Ph.D. thesis, Beijing Normal University.Google Scholar
  5. Zhang, H. Z., & Zhang, P. Y. (2011). Group-reference effect, a special self-reference effect. Journal of Ningbo University (Educational Science Edition), 33(2), 39–43.Google Scholar
  6. Zhou, H., & Long, L. R. (2010). Referent selection in justice studies. Advances in Psychological Science, 18(6), 948–954.Google Scholar

English-Language Sources

  1. Barsäde, S. G., & Gibson, D. E. (1998). Group emotion: A view from top and bottom.Google Scholar
  2. Brief, A. D., & Weiss, H. M. (2002). Organizational behaivior: Affect in the workplace. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 279–307.Google Scholar
  3. Echterhoff, G., Higgins, E. T., & Groll, S. (2005). Audience-tuning effects on memory: The role of shared reality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 257–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Hong, Y. (2009). A dynamic constructivist approach to culture: Moving from describing culture to explaining culture. In R. Wyer, C-Y. Chiu, & Y. Hong (Eds.), Understanding culture: Theory, research and application (pp. 3–23). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  7. Kluckhohn, C. K. M. (1951). Value and value orientation in the theory of action: An exploration in definition and classification. In T. Parsons & E. A. Shils (Eds.), Toward a general theory of action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Schwartz, S. H., & Bilsky, W. (1987). Toward a universal psychological structure of human values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(3), 550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Social Sciences Academic Press 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yiyin Yang
    • 1
  1. 1.BeijingChina

Personalised recommendations