Advertisement

Pastoral Power and Governmental Subjectivities: An Analysis of a Teacher Recruitment Advertisement

  • Andrew Joseph Pereira
Chapter
Part of the Cultural Studies and Transdisciplinarity in Education book series (CSTE, volume 9)

Abstract

Advertisements commissioned by official ministries make ideal sites for investigating how media discourses are informed by state ideologies. Teacher recruitment advertisements, in particular, may be seen mobilising an ideologically charged vision of teacher professionalism that is at once reductive and productive. This chapter critiques the ideological discourses underlying the narrative representation of professional teacher identity in a Singapore teacher recruitment video advertisement entitled Mrs. Chong which features a caring teacher going out of her way to help an economically disadvantaged student and concludes with the romantic suggestion that the path to success stems from personal inspiration and determination. This chapter illustrates how neoliberal governmentality attempts to place the notion of care under an affective technology. Where the hardships of teaching are as its own rewards, the governmental representations suggest idiosyncratic caring engaging in a privatised form of social work that fails to question larger socio-political forces. The establishing of a critical space for the role of caring and emotions within education is also explored.

Keywords

Affect Emotions Neoliberalism Governmentality Pastoral power Gender Class Subjectivity Education advertisements Media analysis 

References

  1. Ahmed, S. (2003). The politics of fear in the making of worlds. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16(3), 377–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmed, S. (2004). Affective economies. Social Text, 22(2), 117–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baldry, A., & Thibault, P. J. (2006). Multimodal transcription and text analysis: A multimedia toolkit and coursebook. London, UK: Equinox.Google Scholar
  4. Bartky, S. L. (1990). Femininity and domination: Studies in the phenomenology of oppression. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Boler, M. (1999). Feeling power: Emotions and education. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Bordwell, D., & Thompson, K. (2012). Film art: An introduction (10th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  7. Butler, J. (1988). Performative acts and gender constitution: An essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. Theatre Journal, 40(4), 519–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of “sex”. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Chong, T. (2011). Manufacturing authenticity: The cultural production of national identities in Singapore. Modern Asian Studies, 45(04), 877–897.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0026749X09000158 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chua, B. H. (2011). Singapore as model: Planning innovations, knowledge experts. In A. Roy & A. Ong (Eds.), Worlding cities: Asian experiments and the art of being global (pp. 29–54). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  11. Davies, B. (2006). Subjectification: The relevance of Butler’s analysis for education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 27(4), 425–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Derrida, J. (1988). Limited inc (S. Weber & J. Mehlman, Trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Eagleton, T. (1983). Literary theory: An introduction (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  14. Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge (S. Smith, Trans.). London, UK: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  15. Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality. Volume 1: An introduction, translated by Robert Hurley. New York, NY: Vintage.Google Scholar
  16. Foucault, M. (1982, Summer). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Foucault, M. (2007). Security, territory, population. Lectures at the College de France 1977–1978. (G. Burchell, Trans.). London, UK: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  18. Foucault, M. (2008). The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the College de France (G. Burchell, Trans. A. Davidson Ed.). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  19. Gee, J. P. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (2nd ed.). London, UK: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  20. Goh, R. B. H. (2003). Textual spaces, social identities and race in Singapore advertising. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 6(2), 131–156.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549403006002001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harms, J., & Kellner, D. (1991). Toward a critical theory of advertising. Retrieved from http://www.uta.edu/huma/illuminations/
  22. Hemmings, C. (2005). Invoking affect: Cultural theory and the ontological turn. Cultural Studies, 19(5), 548–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kelly, M. G. (2013). Foucault, subjectivity, and technologies of the self. In C. Falzon, T. O’Leary, & J. Sawicki (Eds.), A companion to Foucault (pp. 78–105). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  24. Kenway, J., & Bullen, E. (2001). Consuming children: Entertainment, advertising and education. Buckingham, PA: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Koh, A. (2009). The visualization of education policy: A videological analysis of learning journeys. Journal of Education Policy, 24(3), 283–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Law, L., Wee, C., & McMullan, F. (2011). Screening Singapore: The cinematic landscape of Eric Khoo’s Be With Me. Geographical Research, 49(4), 363–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lazar, M. M. (2007). Feminist critical discourse analysis: Articulating a feminist discourse praxis. Critical Discourse Studies, 4(2), 141–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Leonardo, Z., & Zembylas, M. (2013). Whiteness as technology of affect: Implications for educational praxis. Equity & Excellence in Education, 46(1), 150–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lim, V. F., & O’Halloran Kay, L. (2012). The ideal teacher: An analysis of a teacher-recruitment advertisement. Semiotica, 189(1/4), 229–253.Google Scholar
  31. Luke, A. (2004). Teaching after the market: From commodity to cosmopolitan. Teachers College Record, 106(7), 1422–1443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Machin, D., & Mayr, A. (2012). How to do critical discourse analysis: A multimodal introduction. London, UK: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  33. MOE (Producer). (2011). Mrs. Chong. [Video file] Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GETzOHRPqus
  34. Mok, K. H. (2007). Globalisation, new education governance and state capacity in East Asia. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 5(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ng, J. W. Q., & Teo, P. C. S. (2015). “Every teacher, a caring educator”: A multimodal discourse analysis of a teacher recruitment video in Singapore. Multimodal Communication, 4(1), 15–29.Google Scholar
  36. Ng, P. T. (2010). The evolution and nature of school accountability in the Singapore education system. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 22(4), 275–292.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-010-9105-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nias, J. (1996). Thinking about feeling: The emotions in teaching. Cambridge Journal of Education, 26(3), 293–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Noddings, N. (1986). Fidelity in teaching, teacher education, and research for teaching. Harvard Educational Review, 56(4), 496–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nuttall, J., Brennan, M., Zipin, L., Tuinamuana, K., & Cameron, L. (2013). Lost in production: The erasure of the teacher educator in Australian university job advertisements. Journal of Education for Teaching, 39(3), 329–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. O’Toole, M. (1994). The language of displayed art. London, UK: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Ong, J. (2016). PSLE T-score to be replaced with wider scoring bands in 2021. Channel News Asia. Retrieved from http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/psle-t-score-to-be/2676852.html
  42. Phang, S.-Y. (2007). The Singapore model of housing and the welfare state. In R. Groves, A. Murie, & C. Watson (Eds.), Housing and the new welfare state: Perspectives from East Asia and Europe (pp. 15–46). London, UK: Routledge. Retrieved from http://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/596 Google Scholar
  43. Poon, A. M. C. (2005). Performing national service in Singapore: (Re)imagining nation in the poetry and short stories of Alfian Sa’at. The Journal of Commonwealth Literature, 40(3), 118–138.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0021989405056977 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Poon, A. (2013). Common ground, multiple claims: Representing and constructing Singapore’s “heartland”. Asian Studies Review, 37(4), 559–576.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2013.844768 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Richard, A., & Rudnyckyj, D. (2009). Economies of affect. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 15(1), 57–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rosener, J. (1989). Ways women lead. Harvard Business Review, 68(6), 119–125.Google Scholar
  47. Rushton, R., & Bettinson, G. (2010). What is film theory?: An introduction to contemporary debates. Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Schick, C. (2000). White women teachers accessing dominance. Discourse, 21(3), 299–309.Google Scholar
  49. Sinfield, A. (1992). Faultlines: Cultural materialism and the politics of dissident reading. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Skålén, P., Fellesson, M., & Fougère, M. (2006). The governmentality of marketing discourse. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 22(4), 275–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Skutski, K. J. (2008). Film & film theory. Retrieved from http://www.skutski.org/film.html
  52. Stibbe, A. (2009). Advertising awareness. In A. Stribbe (Ed.), The handbook of sustainability literacy: Skills for a changing world (pp. 37–42). Foxhole, UK: Green Books.Google Scholar
  53. Tan, J. (1998). The marketisation of education in Singapore: Policies and implications. International Review of Education/Internationale Zeitschrift fuer Erziehungswissenschaft/Revue Internationale de l’Education, 44(1), 47–63.Google Scholar
  54. Tan, J., & Gopinathan, S. (2000). Education reform in Singapore: Towards greater creativity and innovation? NIRA Review, 7, 5–10.Google Scholar
  55. Tan, R. (Writer). (2002). 15. In. Singapore, Singapore: Pleasure Factory.Google Scholar
  56. Taylor, C. (2004). Modern social imaginaries. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Thompson, J. (1984). Studies in the theory of ideology. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  58. Tsolidis, G., & Pollard, V. (2007). Re-deploying techniques of pastoral power by telling tales on student teachers. Teaching Education, 18(1), 49–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wee, C.-L. (2012). The suppressed in the modern urbanscape: Cultural difference and film in Singapore. Positions, 20(4), 983–1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Weedon, C. (1997). Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  61. Yeoh, B., & Kong, L. (1999). The notion of place in the construction of history, nostalgia and heritage. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 17(1), 52–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Youdell, D. (2006). Subjectivation and performative politics—Butler thinking Althusser and Foucault: Intelligibility, agency and the raced–nationed–religioned subjects of education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 27(4), 511–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew Joseph Pereira
    • 1
  1. 1.National Institute of EducationNanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations