Advertisement

Governmentality and Education: Vulnerable Triumphalism as a Technology

  • Andrew Joseph Pereira
Chapter
Part of the Cultural Studies and Transdisciplinarity in Education book series (CSTE, volume 9)

Abstract

The introduction sets the stage for investigating the portrayal of culture and education within the educational imaginary of neoliberalism and governmentality. This chapter problematises the deployment of triumphalist caring discourses within an affective technology in various advertisements and media. Designed from the theoretical concerns of affect, neoliberalism, and governmentality, the theoretical framework compares a teacher recruitment video advertisement with various news and policies to trace an affective technology harnessing vulnerabilities and aspirations for a sense of nation triumphalism.

Keywords

Affect Emotions Neoliberalism Governmentality Vulnerabilities Aspirations Triumphalism 

References

  1. Ahmed, S. (2004). Affective economies. Social Text, 22(2), 117–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London, UK: Verso.Google Scholar
  3. Apple, M. W. (2001a). Comparing neo-liberal projects and inequality in education. Comparative Education, 37(4), 409–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Apple, M. W. (2001b). Educating the right way: Markets, standards, god, and inequality. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Ball, S. J. (2013). Foucault, power, and education. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Birch, D. (1993). Singapore media: Communication strategies and practices. Melbourne, Australia: Longman Cheshire.Google Scholar
  7. Birch, D. (1999). Reading state communication as public culture. In P. Chew & A. Kramer-Dahl (Eds.), Reading culture: Textual practices in Singapore (pp. 19–36). Singapore: Times Academic Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bowe, R., Ball, S., & Gewirtz, S. (1994). ‘Parental choice’, consumption and social theory: The operation of micro-markets in education. British Journal of Educational Studies, 42(1), 38–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown, D. (2000). Contemporary nationalism: Civic, ethnocultural and multicultural politics. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble and the subversion of identity. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Chan, F. (2013, September 5). Singapore 2nd most competitive economy again. The Straits Times, p. A6.Google Scholar
  12. Chen, K.-H. (2010). Asia as method: Toward deimperialization. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cheung, W.-L., & Sidhu, R. (2003). A tale of two cities: Education responds to globalisation in Hong Kong and Singapore in the aftermath of the Asian economic crisis. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 23(1), 43–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Connell, R. (2013). The neoliberal cascade and education: An essay on the market agenda and its consequences. Critical Studies in Education, 54(2), 99–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Davies, B., & Bansel, P. (2007). Neoliberalism and education. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 20(3), 247–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Foo, A. (2013, September 5). Experts raise Singapore’s GDP forecast to 2.9%. The Straits’ Times, p. A1.Google Scholar
  17. Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Foucault, M. (1994). The subject and power. In J. Faubion (Ed.), Michel Foucault: Power (R. Hurley, Trans., pp. 326–348). New York, NY: New Press.Google Scholar
  19. Foucault, M. (2003). Society must be defended: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975–1976 (F. Ewald, Trans., Vol. 3). London, UK: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  20. Foucault, M. (2007). Security, territory, population. Lectures at the College de France 1977–1978 (G. Burchell, Trans.). London, UK: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  21. Foucault, M. (2008). The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the College de France (G. Burchell, Trans. & A. Davidson Ed.). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  22. Foucault, M. (2009). Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the College de France 1977–1978 (G. Burchell, Trans. & M. Senellart, F. Ewald, & A. Fontana, Eds.). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  23. Goh, C. T. (1997, January 02, 2008). National Day Rally Speech Global city, best home. Retrieved from http://www.moe.gov.sg/media/speeches/1997/240897.htm.
  24. Gulson, K. N., & Fataar, A. (2011). Neoliberal governmentality, schooling and the city: Conceptual and empirical notes on and from the Global South. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 32(2), 269–283.Google Scholar
  25. Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Holloway, S. L., & Pimlott-Wilson, H. (2011). The politics of aspiration: Neo-liberal education policy, “low” parental aspirations, and primary school Extended Services in disadvantaged communities. Children’s Geographies, 9(1), 79–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Koh, A. (2010). Tactical globalization: Learning from the Singapore experiment. Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Koh, A., & Kenway, J. (2012). Cultivating national leaders in an elite school: Deploying the transnational in the national interest. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 22(4), 333–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lazzarato, M. (2009). Neoliberalism in action inequality, insecurity and the reconstitution of the social. Theory, Culture & Society, 26(6), 109–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lee, T., & Willnat, L. (2009). Media management and political communication in Singapore. In L. Willnat & A. Aw (Eds.), Political communication in Asia (pp. 93–111). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. MOE (Producer). (2011, January 30). Mrs. Chong. [Video file] Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GETzOHRPqus.
  32. MOE (Producer). (2016, February 23). Why? [Video file] Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NL-c0PWN48I.
  33. Ortmann, S. (2009). Singapore: The politics of inventing national identity. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 28(4), 23–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ortmann, S. (2014). Democratization and the discourse on stability in Hong Kong and Singapore. Taiwan Journal of Democracy, 10(1), 123–145.Google Scholar
  35. Poon, A. M. C. (2005). Performing national service in Singapore: (Re)imagining nation in the poetry and short stories of Alfian Sa’at. The Journal of Commonwealth Literature, 40(3), 118–138.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0021989405056977 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Power, S., Halpin, D., & Whitty, G. (1997). Managing the state and the market: ‘New’ education management in five countries. British Journal of Educational Studies, 45(4), 342–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Richard, A., & Rudnyckyj, D. (2009). Economies of affect. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 15(1), 57–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2009). Globalizing education policy. London, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rose, N. (1999). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rose-Redwood, R. S. (2006). Governmentality, geography, and the geo-coded world. Progress in Human Geography, 30(4), 469–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sahlberg, P. (2011). The fourth way of Finland. Journal of Educational Change, 12(2), 173–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schirato, T., Danaher, G., & Webb, J. (2012). Understanding Foucault: A critical introduction. London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
  43. Sellar, S., & Lingard, B. (2013). Looking East: Shanghai, PISA 2009 and the reconstitution of reference societies in the global education policy field. Comparative Education, 49(4), 464–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Singstats. (2018, September 28). Population trends. Retrieved from https://www.singstat.gov.sg/publications/population-trends
  45. Tan, K. P. (2011). The ideology of pragmatism: Neo-liberal globalisation and political authoritarianism in Singapore. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 42(1), 67–92.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2012.634644 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Taylor, C. (2004). Modern social imaginaries. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Tham, Y. C. (2013, September 5). Singapore ‘risks being Asean’s slowest growing country’: Shanmugam. The Straits Times, p B2.Google Scholar
  48. Venn, C. (2009). Neoliberal political economy, biopolitics and colonialism a transcolonial genealogy of inequality. Theory, Culture & Society, 26(6), 206–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Whitty, G. (1989). The new right and the national curriculum: State control or market forces? Journal of Education Policy, 4(4), 329–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Whitty, G., & Power, S. (2000). Marketization and privatization in mass education systems. International Journal of Educational Development, 20(2), 93–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Yao, S. (2007). Singapore: The state and the culture of excess. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew Joseph Pereira
    • 1
  1. 1.National Institute of EducationNanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations