Estate and Smallholding Oil Palm Production in Sarawak: A Comparison of Profitability and Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Using field data and information from a palm oil company and neighbouring independent smallholders in Sarawak, this research estimated the profitability and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of oil palm producers, and compared the outputs of estate and smallholder production systems. The results indicate that the estate and smallholders had unique operation styles and costs incurred, with the estate achieving greater productivity (and profitability) per hectare and higher GHG emissions per net profit when the emissions from land-use change were considered. Efficiency in terms of fertiliser application was key to explaining this difference. Nonetheless, it was evident that the overall cost efficiency of smallholders was not lower than that of the estate. If the effect of land-use changes is considered, estate production results in much higher GHG emissions (and hence greater environmental costs) than smallholder production. The results also indicate large variations in the costs, revenues and GHG emissions among smallholders. This may reflect less standardised aspects of operations and therefore a relatively high degree of flexibility in smallholder production, as well as other variables such as site conditions and the age of trees.
KeywordsSarawak Oil palm plantations Smallholders Land-use change Greenhouse gases
This study was supported by the Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (S) of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science for the project titled ‘Planted Forests in Equatorial Southeast Asia: Human-Nature Interactions in High Biomass Society’. The authors would like to express their gratitude to the estate company staff and smallholders in Sarawak for their sincere cooperation during the research.
- Asian Development Bank [ADB]. 2007. Statistical database system. https://sdbs.adb.org/sdbs/index.jsp. Accessed 9 July 2018.
- Azman, Ismail, Mohd Arif Simeh, and M. Mohd Noor. 2003. The production cost of oil palm fresh fruit bunches: The cases of independent smallholders in Johor. Oil Palm Industry Economic Journal 3 (1): 1–7.Google Scholar
- Boeke, Julius Herman. 1953. Economics and economic policy of dual societies as exemplified by Indonesia. New York: International Secretariat, Institute of Pacific Relations.Google Scholar
- Colchester, Marcus, and Sophie Chao, eds. 2011. Oil palm expansion in South East Asia: Trends and implications for local communities and indigenous peoples. Moreton-in-Marsh: Forest Peoples Program and Bogor: Perkumpulan Sawit Watch.Google Scholar
- ———, eds. 2013. Conflict or consent? The oil palm sector at a crossroads. Moreton-in-Marsh: Forest Peoples Programme, Bogor: Perkumpulan Sawit Watch and Jakarta: Transformasi untuk Keadilan Indonesia.Google Scholar
- Cramb, Rob A., and Deanna Ferraro. 2012. Custom and capital: A financial appraisal of alternative arrangements for large-scale oil palm development on customary land in Sarawak, Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Economic Studies 49 (1): 49–69.Google Scholar
- Department of Statistics Malaysia [DOS]. 2013. Monthly external trade statistics, December 2013. http://www.statistics.gov.my/portal/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2248&Itemid=111&lang=en. Accessed 9 July 2018.
- Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC]. 2006. 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme, ed. Simon Eggleston, Leandro Buendia, Kyoko Miwa, Todd Ngara, and Kiyoto Tanabe. Japan: Institute for Global Environmental Strategies.Google Scholar
- International Sustainability and Carbon Certification [ISCC]. 2011. ISCC 205 GHG emissions calculation methodology and GHG audit. Cologne: International Sustainability and Carbon Certification.Google Scholar
- Malaysian Palm Oil Board [MPOB]. 1999–2011. Malaysian oil palm statistics. http://econ.mpob.gov.my/economy/ei_statistics_content.htm. Accessed 19 Aug 2018.
- Nagata, Junji, and Sachiho W. Arai. 2013. Evolutionary change in the oil palm plantation sector in Riau province, Sumatra. In The palm oil controversy in Southeast Asia: A transnational perspective, ed. Oliver Pye and Jayati Bhattacharya, 76–96. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
- Pye, Oliver, and Jayati Bhattacharya, eds. 2013. The palm oil controversy in Southeast Asia: A transnational perspective. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
- Statistics Indonesia. 2014. http://www.bps.go.id/eng/hasil_publikasi/SI_2014/index3.php?pub=Statistik%20Indonesia%202014. Accessed 9 July 2018.
- Subramaniam, Vijaya, Choo Yuen May, Halimah Muhammad, Zulkifli Hashim, Tan Yew Ai, and Puah Chiew We. 2010. Life cycle assessment of the production of crude palm oil (part 3). Journal of Oil Palm Research 22: 895–903.Google Scholar
- Teoh, Cheng Hai. 2010. Key sustainability issues in the palm oil sector: A discussion paper for multi-stakeholders consultations. Washington, DC: International Finance Corporation, World Bank Group.Google Scholar
- Zulkifli, Hashim, Halimah Muhammad, Chan Kok Weng, Y.M. Choo, and Mohd Basri Wahid. 2010. Life cycle assessment for oil palm fresh fruit bunch production from continued land use for oil palm planted on mineral soil (part 2). Journal of Oil Palm Research 22: 887–894.Google Scholar