Integrating Indigenous Systems of Medicines in the Healthcare System in India: Need and Way Forward

  • Vandana Roy


The existence of medical systems in India can be said to date from the time of the earliest civilization in the subcontinent. The systems evolved with time, as foreign invaders, travellers, missionaries came and they brought with them practices being followed in their countries. These got assimilated into the culture of the local inhabitants. These medical systems include Ayurveda, Unani, Siddha, Yoga, Naturopathy and Sowa Rigpa. These have been brought together under the Ministry of AYUSH (Ayurveda, Yoga, Unani, Siddha and Homeopathy). Besides these, there are other folk medicines used in India.

These systems have provided healthcare to a large part of the population. Despite their existence for such a long time, these systems are not as prominent as the modern system (allopathic) in terms of presence in the healthcare system, the extent of use by the people, contribution to research, drug discovery and economic growth of the country.

There are many reasons for this situation. The most important among these being historical failures on the part of the ruling colonial government in pre independence India, that promoted the modern system of medicine while deriding the existing traditional systems of medicines. This practice continued for many years till independence when the Indian Government realized the mistake that had been done and started taking measures for rectification.

Many steps have been taken in this direction, which include establishing of a separate ministry for the same (AYUSH), establishment of independent regulatory councils for each system, government funded research centers, pharmacopoeias, formularies, making of the Traditional Knowledge Digital Library, inclusion of AYUSH systems under National Rural Health Mission and so on. Despite this progress, there remains a gap between the mainstream healthcare system and the AYUSH services that are being established in the country.

Some issues need to be addressed for the AYUSH systems to get established as independent systems of medicines in parallel to the allopathic system, offering true choices to the patients. For this to happen a paradigm shift in the way the systems are being developed is required.

No dilution of the science and philosophy of one system with the other must be done as is happening at the moment. Each system must be allowed to grow and develop so that the advantages and disadvantages of each can be appreciated by all patients and doctors alike. Integration of the best practices of each system will follow automatically as it is realized that there are real advantages of using all systems of medicines for different purposes and ailments. Integrating the indigenous systems of medicines with allopathy in the healthcare system will offer people choices for improving their health, in the true sense.


AYUSH Allopathy India Utilization Public health system Integration 


  1. Academic Consortium of Academic Health Centers for Integrative Medicine and Health. Definition of integrative medicine. 2018. Accessed 20 Jul 2018.
  2. Aggarwal BB, Prasad S, Reuter S, et al. Identification of novel anti-inflammatory agents from ayurvedic medicine for prevention of chronic diseases: “reverse pharmacology” and “bedside to branch” approach. Curr Drug Target. 2011;12:1595–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Albert S, Porter J. Is mainstreaming AYUSH the right policy for Meghalaya, north east India? BMC Complement Altern Med. 2015;15:288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anonymous. CCRAS research an overview, Central Council for Research in Ayurveda and Sciences. New Delhi: Department of AYUSH, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India; 2002. p. 63–8.Google Scholar
  5. Anonymous. Section 9: AYUSH related Foreign Trade 2014. AYUSH. 2014. Accessed 12 Jul 2018.
  6. Anonymous. The basics: defining integrative medicine. 2018. Accessed 25 Jun 2018.
  7. AYUSH Ministry. Government of India. Summary of All India AYUSH infrastructure facility. 2018. Accessed 18 Jul 2018.
  8. AYUSH Ministry. Government of India. AYUSH. 2015. Accessed 18 Jul 2018.
  9. Bhatt S, Gupta V, Srikanth N. Feasibility of integrating Ayurveda with modern system of medicine in a Tertiary Care Hospital for management of osteoarthritis (knee)- an observational study. Technical report Central Council for Research in Ayurveda and Siddha. 2007.Google Scholar
  10. Buch ZM. Role of Ayurveda integrated cancer rehabilitation: Ayurvaids integrated cancer rehabilitation program (ICRP)—a role model. Int Ayurvedic Med J. 2014;2:233–8.Google Scholar
  11. Central Council for Research in Ayurveda and Siddha. An appraisal of tribal- folk medicines. New Delhi: Department of AYUSH, Ministry of Health and family Welfare, Government of India; 1999.Google Scholar
  12. Chandra S, Parwardhan K. Allopathic, AYUSH and informal medical practitioners in rural India- a prescription for change. J Ayurveda Integr Med. 2018;9:143–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chandra S. Status of Indian medicine & folk healing: with a focus on benefits that the systems have given to the public. Under the aegis of Department of AYUSH, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India. 2011.
  14. Chopra A, Saluja M, Tillu G. Ayurveda- modern medicine interface- a critical appraisal of studies of ayurvedic medicines to treat osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. J Ayurveda Integr Med. 2010;1:190–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cohen PA, Ernst E. Safety of herbal supplements a guide for cardiologists. Cardiovasc Ther. 2010;28:246–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Department of AYUSH. Ministry of health & family welfare, Government of India. National policy on Indian systems of medicine and homeopathy 2002. (2002). Accessed 12 Jul 2018.
  17. Dua AS. Human resources for health. In: Lal PG, Byword Editorial Consultants, editors. In financing & delivery of health care services in India. New Delhi: Cirrus Graphics Pvt. Ltd. National Commission on Macroeconomics and Health, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India; 2005. p. 153–71.Google Scholar
  18. FOD(NSSO)—Ministry of Statistics and PI. Government of India. Utilization of medical services (42nd Round), New Delhi 1986–1987. 2016. Accessed 5 Aug 2018.
  19. Galor SW, Benzie IFF. Herbal medicine: an introduction to its history, usage, regulation, current trends and research needs. In: Benzie IFF, Wachtel-Galor S, editors. Herbal medicine: biomolecular and clinical aspects. 2nd ed. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press Taylor & Francis; 2011.
  20. Gangadharan GG, Shankar D. Medical Pluralism-the challenges ahead. Indian J Tradit Knowl. 2009;8:181–4.Google Scholar
  21. Government of India. Ministry of Health & Family Welfare. Drugs & Cosmetics Act (1940) and Rules (1945). 2014. Accessed 29 Oct 2014.
  22. IMA. IMA against AYUSH practitioners prescribing allopathy. 2013. Accessed 5 Aug 2018.
  23. Kooreman P, Baars EW. Patients whose GP knows complementary medicine tend to have lower costs and live longer. Eur J Health Econ. 2012;13(6):769–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mandhare PM, Garje BH, Khade AA. Importance of herbal remedies in the treatment of HIV and TB infection. Int J Sci Res Methodol. 2015;1:1–17.Google Scholar
  25. Ministry of Health & Family Welfare. Government of India. National Rural Health Mission—Meeting people’s health needs in rural areas (Framework for Implementation 2005–2012). 2012. Accessed 9 Jul 2018.
  26. Ministry of Health & Family Welfare. Government of India. National Health Policy. 1983. Accessed 10 Jun 2018.
  27. Ministry of Health & Family Welfare. Government of India. National Health Policy 2017. Accessed Jun 2018.
  28. Ministry of Health & Family Welfare. Govt. of India. National Health Policy-2002. 2002. Accessed 10 Jun 2018.
  29. Nundy M. Primary health care in India: review of policy, plan and committee reports. In: Lal PG, Byword Editorial Consultants, editors. Financing & delivery of health care services in India. New Delhi: Cirrus Graphics Pvt. Ltd. National Commission on Macroeconomics and Health, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India; 2005. p. 39–42.Google Scholar
  30. Payyappallimana U. Role of traditional medicine in primary health care: an overview of perspectives and challenges. Yokohama J Soc Sci. 2010;14:57–77.Google Scholar
  31. Planning Commission. Government of India. Report of the Steering Committee on Health for the 12th 11th Five-Year Plan 2007-12. 2007. Accessed 9 Jul 2018.
  32. Planning Commission. Government of India. High level expert group report on universal health coverage for India 2011. 2011. Accessed 12 Jul 2018.
  33. Planning Commission. Government of India. Steering Committee on Health. 12th Five Year Plan 2012. Accessed 5 Aug 2018.
  34. Priya R, Shweta AS. Status and role of AYUSH and local health traditions under the National Rural Health Mission-Report of a study. New Delhi: National Health Systems Resource Centre (NHSRC), National Rural Health Mission, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India; 2010.Google Scholar
  35. Roy V, Gupta M, Ghosh RK. Perception, attitude & usage of complimentary & alternative medicines among doctors and patients in a tertiary care hospital in India. Indian J Pharmacol. 2015;47:137–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sahoo N, Manchikanti P. Herbal drug regulation and commercialization: an Indian industry perspective. J Altern Complement Med. 2013;19:957–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sen S, Chakraborty R. Toward the integration and advancement of herbal medicine: a focus on traditional Indian medicine. Bot Target Ther. 2015;5:33–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sen S, Chakraborty R. Revival, modernization and integration of Indian traditional herbal medicine in clinical practice: importance, challenges and future. J Trad Complent Med. 2017;7:234–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Singh P, Yadav RJ, Pandey A. Utilization of indigenous systems of medicines and homeopathy in India. Ind J Med Res. 2005;122:137–42.Google Scholar
  40. Subbbarayappa BV. The roots of ancient medicine: a historical outline. J Biosci. 2001;26:135–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sujatha V. What could integrative medicine mean? Social science perspectives on contemporary Ayurveda. J Ayurveda Integr Med. 2011;2:115–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sundar R. Household survey of Health Care utilization and expenditure. National Council of Applied Economic Research, New Delhi 1995. Accessed 5 Aug 2018.
  43. Supreme Court of India. Judgement in the case of Dr. Mukhtiar Chand and others vs State of Punjab and Others, 08/10/1998. 1998. Accessed 29 Oct 2014.
  44. Supreme Court of India. Judgment in the case of Poonam Verma Vs Ashwin Patel and others. 1996. http:// Accessed 5 Aug 2018.
  45. United Nations. The Declaration of Alma Ata. 1978. Accessed 14 Jul 2018.
  46. Vaidya ADB. Effective integration of Indian Systems of Medicine in health care delivery: people’s participation, access and choice in a pluralistic democracy. In: Lal PG, Byword Editorial Consultants, editors. Financing & delivery of Health Care Services in India. New Delhi: National Commission on Macroeconomics and Health, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India; 2005. p. 39–42.Google Scholar
  47. World Health Organization. Traditional Medicine Strategy 2014–23. 2013. Accessed 12 Jul 2018.
  48. World Health Organization. Global Health Statistics 2012. 2012. Accessed 12 Jul 2018.
  49. World Health Organization. WHO Traditional medicine strategy 2002–2005. 2002 Geneva: World Health Organization;;jsessionid=C198C0977291DEBCE60D69D7DC8B329B?sequence=1/.Google Scholar
  50. Zaman T, Agarwal S, Handa R. Complimentary and alternative medicine use in rheumatoid arthritis: an audit of patients visiting a tertiary care center. Natl Med J India. 2007;20:236–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vandana Roy
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PharmacologyMaulana Azad Medical College and Associated Hospitals, University of DelhiNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations