Advertisement

Can Social Property Survive Under Neoliberalism?: A View from Australia

  • Peter D. BurdonEmail author
  • James G. Stewart
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter addresses the practicalities and possibilities of Leon Duguit’s social function norm under neo-liberalism. Addressing Duguit’s articulation of the social function norm through a contemporary lens, this chapter argues that the steady shift towards individualistic property relations limits the social function norm’s application. Drawing from key thinkers on neoliberalism, this chapter balances contemporary issues in property, with Duguit’s own evolutionary assumptions on property rights. We conclude by acknowledging the difficulties in finding common ground between the social function norm and contemporary, neoliberal approaches to property, before identifying one major exception. Through Bonnie Honig’s idea of ‘public things’, we argue that within the public space there is a potential to utilise the social function norm to aid ideas of community and property. This nuanced application of Duguit locates a nexus where social obligations can function under neoliberalism.

Social relations Neoliberalism Public things Property Social obligations 

References

  1. Babie P (2011) Choices that matter: three propositions on the individual, private property, and anthropogenic climate change. Color. J. Int. Environ. Law Policy 22:323–356Google Scholar
  2. Babie P, Burdon P, da Rimini F (2018) The idea of property: an introductory empirical assessment. Houst. J. Int. Law 40:797Google Scholar
  3. Blackstone W (1979) Commentaries on the laws of England. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonilla D (2011) Liberalism and property in Columbia: property as a right and property as a social function. Fordham Law Rev 80(3):1135–1170Google Scholar
  5. Bosselmann K, Taylor P (eds) (2017) Ecological approaches to environmental law. Edward Elgar Pub, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown W (2017) Undoing the demos: Neoliberalism’s Stealth revolution. Zone Books, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  7. Burdon PD (2014) Earth jurisprudence: private property and the environment. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Cohen FS (1954) Dialogue on private property. Rutgers Law Rev. 9:357–387Google Scholar
  9. Cole DH (2002) Pollution and property: comparing ownership institutions for environmental protection. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  10. Cunha AS (2011) The social function of property in Brazilian law. Fordham Law Rev. 80(3):1171–1181Google Scholar
  11. Duguit L (1889) Le Droit Constitutionnel et la Sociologie. RIE 18:484–505Google Scholar
  12. Duguit L [trans: Viven-Wilksch J] (2019) Sixth Lecture — La Proprieté Fonction Sociale. In: Babie P, Viven-Wilksch J (eds) Léon Duguit and the Social Obligation Norm of Property: A Translation and Global Exploration. Springer, New York, pp 35–61Google Scholar
  13. Elliot TS (2013) The waste land. Martino Fine Books, EastfordGoogle Scholar
  14. Engels F (1978) Socialism: utopian and scientific. In: Tucker RC (ed) The marx-engels reader. WW Norton & Company, New York, pp 683–717Google Scholar
  15. Foucault M (2010) The birth of biopolitics: lectures at the collège de France, 1978–1979. Picador, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. Freyfogle ET (2003) The land we share: private property and the common good. Island Press, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  17. Garrett B (2015) The privatisation of cities public spaces is escalating. It is time to take a stand. The guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2015/aug/04/pops-privately-owned-public-space-cities-direct-action. Accessed 27 Aug 2018
  18. Graham N (2011) Lawscape: property, environment, law. Routledge-Cavendish, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Grinlinton D, Taylor P (eds) (2011) Property rights and sustainability: the evolution of property rights to meet ecological challenges. Brill, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  20. Hale RL (1923) Coercion and distribution in a supposedly non-coercive state. Polit Sci Q 38:470–494Google Scholar
  21. Hale RL (1943) Bargaining, duress and economic liberty. Columbia Law Rev 43:603–628Google Scholar
  22. Harris JW (1996) Property and justice. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  23. Harvey D (2005) A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  24. Hinkle RC (1976) Durkheim’s evolutionary conception of social change. Sociol Q 17:336–346Google Scholar
  25. Honig B (2017) Public things: democracy in disrepair. Fordham University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Howe MD (ed) (1953) Holmes-Laski letters, vol 1. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  27. Humphrys E (2015) The corporatist origins of neoliberalism: Australia’s accord, the labour movement and the neoliberal project. PhD Thesis, University of SydneyGoogle Scholar
  28. Jackson W (2011) Consulting the genius of the place: an ecological approach to a new agriculture. Counterpoint, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  29. Jackson W, Berry W (1985) Meeting the expectations of the land: essays in sustainable agriculture and stewardship. North Point Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Jones HS (2002) The French state in question. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  31. Kennedy D (1991) The stakes of law, or Hale and Foucault! Leg Stud Forum 15:327–365Google Scholar
  32. Klein N (2008) The shock doctrine: the rise of disaster capitalism. Picador, LondonGoogle Scholar
  33. LaCapra D (1985) Emile Durkheim: sociologist and philosopher. Cornell University Press, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  34. Mirow MC (2010) The social-obligation norm of property: Duguit, Hayem, and Others. Fla J Int Law 22:191–226Google Scholar
  35. Morgan G, Nelligan P (2018) the creativity hoax: precarious work in the gig economy. Anthem Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  36. Nedelsky J (1990) Law, boundaries and the bounded self. Representations 30:162–189Google Scholar
  37. Nedelsky J (2013) Law’s relations: a relational theory of self, autonomy, and law. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  38. Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  39. Peck J, Theodore N, Brenner N (2009) Neoliberal urbanism: models, moments, mutations. SAIS. Rev Int Aff 29(1):49–66Google Scholar
  40. Peck J, Theodore N, Brenner N (2010) Postneoliberalism and its malcontents. Antipode 41:94–116Google Scholar
  41. Punter JV (1990) The privatisation of the public realm. Plan Pract Res 5(3):9–16Google Scholar
  42. Raff M (2004) Private property and environmental responsibility, a comparative study of German real property law. Kluwer Law International, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  43. Robertson J (2017) Government’s privatisation push extends to $9 billion property sale pipeline. Sydney Morning Herald. https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/governments-privatisation-push-extends-to-9-billion-property-sale-pipeline-20170904-gyagew.html. Accessed 27 Aug 2018
  44. Sinatra J, Murphy P (1999) Listen to the people, listen to the land. Melbourne University Press, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  45. Singer JW (1982) The legal rights debate in analytical jurisprudence from Bentham to Hohfeld. Wis Law Rev 6:975–1060Google Scholar
  46. Singer JW (1992) Re-reading property. N Engl Law Rev 26:711–730Google Scholar
  47. Singer JW (2000) Edges of the field. Beacon, BostonGoogle Scholar
  48. Singer JW, Beerman JM (1993) Social origins of property. Can J Law Jurisprud 6:217–248Google Scholar
  49. Thatcher M (2013) Margaret thatcher: a life in quotes. The guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2013/apr/08/margaret-thatcher-quotes. Accessed 27 Aug 2018
  50. Touraine A (2002) From understanding society to discovering the subject. Anthropol Theory 2(4):387–398Google Scholar
  51. Voyce M (2003) The privatisation of public property: the development of a shopping mall in Sydney and its implications for governance through spatial practices. Urban Policy Res 21(3):249–262Google Scholar
  52. Weir JK (2009) Murray River country: an ecological dialogue with traditional owners. Aboriginal Studies Press, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  53. Zweig S (2013) The world of yesterday. University of Nebraska Press, LincolnGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Adelaide Law SchoolThe University of AdelaideAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations