Digital Piracy: A Multidimensional Perspective

  • Sanjeev P. Sahni
  • Indranath Gupta


This chapter provides a snapshot of the existing status of digital piracy across different countries and enumerates the current laws governing digital piracy in India. It provides a description of the overall study that has been discussed in subsequent chapters. It also shares the process through which the questionnaire used for the study has developed alongside validation and quantitative and qualitative data analyses. The chapter details out the methodology followed as a part of the study. It concludes by listing the limitations of the present study followed by an overall conclusion.


Multidimensional perspective Factors of digital piracy Snapshot of digital piracy Digital piracy questionnaire construction Methodology 


  1. Bagchi, K., Kirs, P., & Cerveny, R. (2006). Global software piracy: Can economic factors alone explain the trend? Communications of the ACM, 49(6), 70–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bilton, N. (2012). Internet pirates will always win. The New York Times. Retrieved from
  4. Business Software Alliance. (2003). Eighth annual BSA global software piracy study (IIPA (International Intellectual Property Alliance), Special 301 Report on Copyright Protection and Enforcement: India). Washington, DC: IIPA.Google Scholar
  5. Business Software Alliance. (2016). Seizing opportunity through license compliance: BSA global software survey. Retrieved from
  6. Dai, S. (2018). China’s copyright watchdog eyes 3,000 websites amid latest piracy crackdown. Retrieved from
  7. de Ridder, D. T. D., Lensvelt-Mulders, G., Finkenauer, C., Stok, F. M., & Baumeister, R. F. (2011). Taking stock of self-control. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(1), 76–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fisk, N. (2009). Understanding online piracy: The truth about illegal file sharing. Santa Barbara: Praeger.Google Scholar
  9. Floyd, F. J., & Widaman, K. F. (1995). Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gantz, J., & Rochester, J. (2005). Pirates of the digital millennium: How the intellectual property wars damage our personal freedom, our jobs and the world economy. Hoboken: Prentice Hall/Financial Times.Google Scholar
  11. George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 11.0 update (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  12. Gisclair, J. (2008). The dissonance between culture and intellectual property in China. Southeast Review of Asian Studies, 30, 182–187. Retrieved from Scholar
  13. Gunderson, E. (2003, May 6). Piracy has its hooks in. USA Today. Retrieved from
  14. Hemmige, N. (2013). Piracy in the internet age. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 18(September), 457–464.Google Scholar
  15. Hinduja, S. (2003). Trends and patterns among online software pirates. Ethics and Information Technology, 5, 49–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hinduja, S. (2007). Neutralization theory and online software piracy: An empirical analysis. Ethics and Information Technology, 9(3), 187–204. Scholar
  17. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International difference in work-related values. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. ICC-BASCAP. (2016). Global impacts of counterfeiting and piracy to reach US$4.2 trillion by 2022. Retrieved from
  19. International Business Publications. (2016). Spain investment and business guide: Strategic and practical information (Vol. 1, p. 54). International Business Publications, USA.Google Scholar
  20. Johns, A. (1998). The nature of the book: Print and knowledge in the making. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kalezić, B. (2010). Software piracy in Serbia. INFOtheca, 11(1), 39a–51a.Google Scholar
  23. Lessig, L. (2004). Free culture: How big media uses technology and the law to lock down culture and control creativity. New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  24. Letai, P. (2018). Spain implements website-blocking ‘Sinde Law’. Retrieved from
  25. Murthy, L.G. (2016, September 18). DU photocopy case: A breakthrough in Indian copyright jurisprudence. [Blog post]. Retrieved from
  26. Nwogu, M. I. O. (2015). Copyright law and the menace of piracy in Nigeria. JL Pol’y &Globalization, 34, 113.Google Scholar
  27. Press Information Bureau, WIPO Copyright Treaty, 1996 & WIPO Performance and Phonograms Treaty, 1996, Government of India, on 20 May 2019.
  28. Sahni, S., Jain, G., & Gupta, I. (2016). Understanding digital piracy through the lens of psychosocial, criminological and cultural factors. International Journal of Technology Policy and Law (IJTPL), 3(1), 2017.Google Scholar
  29. Singh, K., Junnarkar, M., & Kaur, J. (2016). Measures of positive psychology: Development and validation. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. The Economic Times. (2018). Press release, definition of ‘piracy’. Available at Last visited March 11, 2019.
  31. The Guardian. (2011, May 3). Why poor countries lead the world in piracy.Google Scholar
  32. U.S. Department of State. (2014). Spain investment climate statement 2014.Google Scholar
  33. Walls, W. D. (2008). Cross-country analysis of movie piracy. Applied Economics, 40(5), 625–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. WIPO Copyright Treaty (WCT). (1996).Google Scholar
  35. WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty (WPPT). (1996).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sanjeev P. Sahni
    • 1
  • Indranath Gupta
    • 2
  1. 1.Jindal Institute of Behavioural SciencesOP Jindal Global UniversitySonipatIndia
  2. 2.Jindal Global Law SchoolOP Jindal Global UniversitySonipatIndia

Personalised recommendations