Skip to main content

Conceptualizing the Potential Role of IoT-Enabled Monitoring System in Deterring Counterproductive Work Behavior

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Smart Technologies

Abstract

With our society apparently becoming technology-obsessed day by day, business organizations would have to involuntarily adapt these innovations to be more efficient and productive. With respect to human resource management, lot many processes such as recruitment, training, and payroll have changed with the technology innovations. These technologies can further be used to detect any potential bad behaviors (also called as counterproductive work behaviors) in organizations. Researchers are increasingly focusing on these behaviors due to its effect on the well-being of the members of the organization and of the organization itself. Internet of things, abbreviated as IoT, is a technology framework that brings technologies together to execute specific actions. It is one of the most intriguing concepts that are attracting the attention of many organizations. This paper discusses the potential use of Internet of things in reducing counterproductive work behaviors (CWB). The paper emphasizes on different devices and techniques of identifying potential CWB. Further, the paper identifies some challenges the organizations might face while including IoT in its system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Appelbaum, S. H., et al. (2007). Positive and negative deviant workplace behaviors: Causes, impacts, and solutions. Corporate Governance International Journal of Business in Society, 586–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowling, N. A., & Eschleman, K. J. (2010). Employee personality as a moderator of the relationships between work stressors and counterproductive work behavior. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 91–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalal, R. S. (2005). A meta-analysis of the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1241–1255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, T. H., Harris, J., & Shapiro, J. (2010). Competing on talent analytics. Harvard Business Review, 88(10), 52–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deloitte. (2015). The Internet of Things really is things, not people. Retrieved from www.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/global/Documents/Technology-Media-Telecommunications/gx-tmt-pred15-iot-is-things.pdf.

  • Fox, S., & Spector, P. E. (1999). A model of work frustration—Aggression. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 915–931.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, S., Spector, P. E., & Miles, D. (2001). Counterproductive work behavior (CWB) in response to job stressors and organizational justice: Some mediator and moderator tests for autonomy and emotions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 291–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henle, C. A. (2005). Predicting workplace deviance from the interaction between organizational justice and personality. Journal of Managerial Issues, 247–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, B., & Schuler, H. (2004). Antecedents of counterproductive behavior at work: A general perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 647–660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mary, B. Y. (2013, February). Going public on HR data privacy: Implications for human capital analytics and strategic workforce planning. The Conference Board. Retrieved from www.conference-board.org/publications/publicationdetail.cfm.

  • Parilla, P. F., et al. (1988). Organizational control of deviant behavior: The case of employee theft. Social Science Quarterly, 261–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S. L., & Bennett, R. J. (1995). A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: A multidimensional scaling study. Academy of Management Journal, 555–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, K., Eldridge, S., & Chapin, L. (2015). The internet of things: An overview. The Internet Society (ISOC), 1–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skarlicki, D. P., Folger, R., & Tesluk, P. (1999). Personality as a moderator in the relationship between fairness and retaliation. Academy of Management Journal, 100–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, P. E., & Fox, S. (2002). An emotion-centered model of voluntary work behavior: Some parallels between counterproductive work behavior (Cwb) and organizational citizenship behavior (Ocb). Human Resource Management Review, 269–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, P. E., et al. (2006). The dimensionality of counterproductivity: Are all counterproductive behaviors created equal? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 446–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vivekananth, P. (2016). The impact of Internet of Things(IoT) in human resource management. IPASJ International Journal of Management (IIJM), 4(9).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Savitha .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Savitha, J., Akhilesh, K.B. (2020). Conceptualizing the Potential Role of IoT-Enabled Monitoring System in Deterring Counterproductive Work Behavior. In: Akhilesh, K., Möller, D. (eds) Smart Technologies . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7139-4_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics