Advertisement

Homogeneous Ensemble Methods for the Prediction of Number of Faults

  • Santosh Singh RathoreEmail author
  • Sandeep Kumar
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Computer Science book series (BRIEFSCOMPUTER)

Abstract

Software testing is intended to find bugs/faults that can occur in the software components currently under development. Software fault prediction (SFP) helps in achieving this goal by predicting the probability of fault occurrence in the software modules before the testing phase.

References

  1. 1.
    Amasaki, S.: Cross-version defect prediction using cross-project defect prediction approaches: does it work? In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Predictive Models and Data Analytics in Software Engineering, pp. 32–41 (2018)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boetticher, G.: The PROMISE repository of empirical software engineering data. http://promisedata.org/repository (2007)
  3. 3.
    D’Ambros, M., Lanza, M., Robbes, R.: An extensive comparison of bug prediction approaches. In: Proceedings of 7th IEEE Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR), pp. 31–41 (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Elish, M.O., Aljamaan, H., Ahmad, I.: Three empirical studies on predicting software maintainability using ensemble methods. Soft Comput. 19(9), 1–14 (2015)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Elish, M.O., Al-Yafei, A.H., Al-Mulhem, M.: Empirical comparison of three metrics suites for fault prediction in packages of object-oriented systems: a case study of eclipse. Adv. Eng. Softw. 42(10), 852–859 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Holmes, G., Donkin, A., Witten, I.H.: Weka: A machine learning workbench. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Australian and New Zealand Conference on Intelligent Information Systems, pp. 357–361 (1994)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jureczko, M., Madeyski, L.: Towards identifying software project clusters with regard to defect prediction. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Predictive Models in Software Engineering, p. 9 (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kumar, S., Rathore, S.S: Software Fault Prediction a Road Map. Springer Brief in Computer Science, 1st edn, pp. 1–72. Springer (2018)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mendes-Moreira, J., Soares, C., Jorge, A.M., Sousa, J.F.D.: Ensemble approaches for regression: A survey. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 45(1), 10 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rathore, S.S., Kumar, S.: An empirical study of some software fault prediction techniques for the number of faults prediction. Soft. Comput. 21(24), 7417–7434 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rathore, S.S., Kumar, S.: Ensemble methods for the prediction of number of faults: a study on eclipse project. In 11th International Conference on Industrial and Information Systems (ICIIS), pp. 540–545 (2016)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shatnawi, R., Li, W.: The effectiveness of software metrics in identifying error-prone classes in post-release software evolution process. J. Syst. Softw. 81(11), 1868–1882 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhu, X., He, Y., Cheng, L., Jia, X., Zhu L.: Software change‐proneness prediction through combination of bagging and resampling methods. J. Softw.: Evol. Process., e2111 (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringABV-Indian Institute of Information Technology and Management GwaliorGwaliorIndia
  2. 2.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology RoorkeeRoorkeeIndia

Personalised recommendations