• Atul Bhargava
  • Shilpi Srivastava


Cereals are members of the family Poaceae, a ubiquitous family of monocotyledonous plants whose members are primarily cultivated for their fruit typically called “caryopsis.” The grain consists of bran (outer layer), endosperm (main part), and germ (smallest part) that are a storehouse of vital nutrients. Cereals are a rich and inexpensive source of carbohydrates, vitamins, minerals, fats, oils, and to some extent proteins, providing more food energy to humans than any other crop group. Four groups of foods are prepared from cereals, viz., whole grain products, baked products, milled grain products, and beverages. Cereals are also a rich source of bioactive substances that play an important role in promoting human health. The present chapter discusses the utility of participatory plant breeding in cereal production with special reference to wheat, rice, maize, barley, sorghum, finger millet, and pearl millet.


  1. Abdel-Aal E-SM, Sosulski FW, Hucl P (1998) Origins, characteristics and potentials of ancient wheats. Cereal Foods World 43:708–715Google Scholar
  2. Adebamowo SN, Eseyin O, Yilme S, Adeyemi D, Willett WC, Hu FB, Spiegelman D, Adebamowo CA, The Global Nutrition Epidemiologic Transition Initiative (2017) A mixed-methods study on acceptability, tolerability, and substitution of brown rice for white rice to lower blood glucose levels among Nigerian adults. Front Nutr 4:33PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Ajiboye TO, Iliasu GA, Adeleye AO et al (2014) Nutritional and antioxidant dispositions of sorghum/millet-based beverages indigenous to Nigeria. Food Sci Nutr 2:597–604PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Alves ML, Belo M, Carbas B, Brites C, Paulo M, Mendes-Moreira P, Brites C, Bronze MR, Šatović Z, Patto MCV (2017a) Long term on-farm participatory maize breeding by stratified mass selection retains molecular diversity while improving agronomic performance. Evol Appl 11:254–270PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Alves ML, Brites C, Paulo M, Carbas B, Belo M, Mendes-Moreira PMR, Brites C, Bronze MR, Gunjača J, Šatović Z, Vaz Patto MC (2017b) Setting up decision-making tools toward a quality-oriented participatory maize breeding program. Front Plant Sci 8:2203PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Antony Ceasar S, Maharajan T, Ajeesh Krishna TP, Ramakrishnan M, Victor Roch G, Satish L, Ignacimuthu S (2018) Finger millet [Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn.] improvement: current status and future interventions of whole genome sequence. Front. Plant Sci 9:1054Google Scholar
  7. Anuradha N, Satyavathi CT, Bharadwaj C, Nepolean T, Sankar SM, Singh SP, Meena MC, Singhal T, Srivastava RK (2017) Deciphering genomic regions for high grain iron and zinc content using association mapping in pearl millet. Front Plant Sci 8:412PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Arpaili D, Yagmur M (2015) The determination of selection criteria using path analysis in two rowed barley (Hordeum vulgare L. Conv. Distichon). Turk J Agric Nat Sci 2:248–255Google Scholar
  9. Asare EK, Jaiswal S, Maley J, Baga M, Sammynaiken R, Rossnagel BG, Chibbar RN (2011) Barley grain constituents, starch composition, and structure affect starch in vitro enzymatic hydrolysis. J Agric Food Chem 59:4743–4754PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Awika JM (2011) Major cereal grains production and use around the world. In: Awika JM, Piironen V, Bean S (eds) Advances in cereal science: implications to food processing and health promotion. ACS, Washington, pp 1–13Google Scholar
  11. Awika JM (2017) Sorghum: its unique nutritional and health-promoting attributes. In: Taylor JRN, Awika JM (eds) Gluten-free ancient grains. Woodhead Publishing, Duxford, pp 21–54Google Scholar
  12. Awika JM, Rooney LW, Wu X, Prior RL, Zevallos LC (2003) Screening methods to measure antioxidant activity of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) and sorghum products. J Agric Food Chem 51:6657–6662PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Baublis AJ, Lu C, Clydesdale FM, Decker EA (2000) Potential of wheat-based breakfast cereals as a source of dietary antioxidants. J Am Coll Nutr 19:308–311Google Scholar
  14. Ceccarelli S, Grando S, Tutwiler R, Baha J, Martini AM, Salahieh H, Goodchild A, Michael M (2000) A methodological study on participatory barley breeding. I. Selection phase. Euphytica 111:91–104Google Scholar
  15. Ceccarelli S, Grando S, Bailey E, Amri A, El Felah M, Nassif F, Rezgui S, Yahyaoui A (2001) Farmer participation in barley breeding in Syria, Morocco and Tunisia. Euphytica 122:521–536Google Scholar
  16. Ceccarelli S, Grando S, Singh M, Michael M, Shikho A, Al Issa M, Al Saleh A, Kaleonjy G, Al Ghanem SM, Al Hasan AL, Dalla H, Basha S, Basha T (2003) A methodological study on participatory barley breeding. II. Response to selection. Euphytica 133:185–200Google Scholar
  17. Chandra D, Chandra S, Pallavi, Sharma AK (2016) Review of finger millet (Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn): a power house of health benefiting nutrients. Food Sci Hum Wellness 5:149–155Google Scholar
  18. Charalampopoulos D, Wang R, Pandiella SS, Webb C (2002) Application of cereals and cereal components in functional foods: a review. Int J Food Microbiol 79:131–141PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Christinck A, Weltzien E (2005) Identifying target regions and target groups. In: Christinck A, Weltzien E, Hoffmann V (eds) Setting breeding objectives and developing seed systems with farmers. A handbook for pratical use in participatory plant breeding projects. Margraf Publishers GmBH, Scientific Books, Weikersheim, pp 25–40Google Scholar
  20. Colombo D, Crovetto GM, Colombini S, Galassi G, Rapetti L (2007) Nutritive value of different hybrids of sorghum forage determined in vitro. Ital J Anim Sci 6:289–291Google Scholar
  21. Courtois B, Bartholome B, Chaudhary D, McLaren G, Misra CH, Mandal NP, Pandey S, Paris T, Piggin C, Prasad K, Roy AT, Sahu RK, Sahu VN, Sarkarung S, Sharma SK, Singh A, Singh HN, Singh ON, Singh NK, Singh RK, Singh S, Sinha PK, Sisodia BVS, Takhur R (2001) Comparing farmers and breeders rankings in varietal selection for low-input environments: A case study of rainfed rice in Eastern India. Euphytica 122:537–550Google Scholar
  22. Das A, Raychaudhuri U, Chakraborty R (2011) Cereal based functional food of Indian subcontinent: a review. J Food Sci Technol 49:665–672PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. De Wet JMJ, Harlan JR (1971) The origin and domestication of Sorghum bicolor. Econ Bot 25:128–135Google Scholar
  24. Deu M, Weltzien E, Calatayud C, Traoré Y, Bazile D, Gozé E, vom Brocke K (2014) How an improved sorghum variety evolves in a traditional seed system in Mali: effects of farmers’ practices on the maintenance of phenotype and genetic composition. Field Crops Res 167:131–142Google Scholar
  25. Devi PB, Vijayabharathi R, Sathyabama S, Malleshi NG, Priyadarisini VB (2014) Health benefits of finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.) polyphenols and dietary fiber: a review. J Food Sci Technol 51:1021–1040PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Dias-Martins AM, Pessanha KLF, Pacheco S, Rodrigues JAS, Carvalho CWP (2018) Potential use of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.) in Brazil: food security, processing, health benefits and nutritional products. Food Res Int 109:175–186PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Dillon SL, Shapter FM, Henry RJ, Cordeiro G, Izquierdo L, Lee LS (2007) Domestication to crop improvement: genetic resources for Sorghum and Saccharum (Andropogoneae). Ann Bot 100:975–989PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Doebley J (2004) The genetics of maize evolution. Ann Rev Gen 38:37–59Google Scholar
  29. Doggett H (1988) Sorghum. Longman Scientific and Technical, LondonGoogle Scholar
  30. Dossou-Aminon I, Dansi A, Ahissou H, Cissé N, Vodouhè R, Sanni A (2015) Climate variability and status of the production and diversity of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) in the arid zone of northwest Benin. Genet Res Crop Evol 63:1181–1201Google Scholar
  31. Dubcovsky J, Dvorak J (2007) Genome plasticity a key factor in the success of polyploid wheat under domestication. Science 316:1862–1866PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Dvorak J (2009) Triticeae genome structure and evolution. In: Feuiller C, Muehlbauer GJ (eds) Genetics and genomics of the Triticeae, plant genetics and genomics: crops and models. Springer, Berlin, pp 685–711Google Scholar
  33. Dykes L, Seitz LM, Rooney WL, Rooney LW (2009) Flavonoid composition of red sorghum genotypes. Food Chem 116:313–317Google Scholar
  34. Edelman M, Colt M (2016) Nutrient value of leaf vs. seed. Front Chem 4:32PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. FAOSTAT (2014) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAO statistical yearbook, FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  36. FAOSTAT (2017) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAO statistical yearbook, FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  37. Farmer Workshop (2001) Workshop report on farmer participation in technology development of rainfed lowland rice for the Upper North and Northeast of Thailand. A workshop organized by Rice Research Institute, Department of Agriculture with cooperation of Faculties of Agriculture of Chiang Mai University and Khon Kaen University, May 2001Google Scholar
  38. Fentie M (2012) Participatory evaluation and selection of improved finger millet varieties in north western Ethiopia. Intern Res J Plant Sci 3:141–146Google Scholar
  39. Friis-Hansen E, Sthapit B (2000) Concepts and rationale of participatory approaches to conservation and use of plant genetic resources. In: Friis-Hansen E, Sthapit B (eds) Participatory approaches to the conservation and use of plant genetic resources. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, pp 16–19Google Scholar
  40. Fufa F, Grando S, Kafawin O, Shakhatreh Y, Ceccarelli S (2010) Efficiency of farmers’ selection in a participatory barley breeding programme in Jordan. Plant Breed 129:156–161Google Scholar
  41. Fuller DQ (2014) Finger Millet: origins and development. In: Smith C (ed) Encyclopedia of global archaeology. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  42. Fuller DQ, Willcox G, Allaby RG (2011) Cultivation and domestication had multiple origins: arguments against the core area hypothesis for the origins of agriculture in the Near East. World Archaeol 43:628–652Google Scholar
  43. Gauch HG (1992) Statistical analysis of regional yield trials: AMMI analysis of factorial designs. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  44. Gauch HG, Zobel RW (1995) AMMI analysis of yield trials. In: Kang MS, Gauch HG (eds) Genotype-by-environment interaction. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  45. Goodman MM (1988) The history and evolution of maize. Crit Rev Plant Sci 7:197–220Google Scholar
  46. Goron TL, Raizada MN (2015) Genetic diversity and genomic resources available for the small millet crops to accelerate a new green revolution. Front Plant Sci 6:157PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Govindaraj M, Shanmugasundaram P, Sumathi P, Muthiah AR (2010) Simple, rapid and cost effective screening method for drought resistant breeding in pearl millet. Electron J Plant Breed 1:590–599Google Scholar
  48. Gowda BTS, Halaswamy BH, Seetharam A, Virk DS, Witcombe JR (2000) Participatory approach in varietal improvement: a case study in finger millet in India. Curr Sci 79:366–368Google Scholar
  49. Gupta SM, Arora S, Mirza N, Pande A, Lata C, Puranik S, Kumar J, Kumar A (2017) Finger millet: a “certain” crop for an “uncertain” future and a solution to food insecurity and hidden hunger under stressful environments. Front Plant Sci 8:643PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Gürel F, Öztürk ZN, Uçarlı C, Rosellini D (2016) Barley genes as tools to confer abiotic stress tolerance in crops. Front Plant Sci 7:1137PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Gyawali S, Sthapit BR, Bhandari B, Bajracharya J, Shrestha PK, Upadhyay MP, Jarvis DI (2010) Participatory crop improvement and formal release of Jethobudho rice landrace in Nepal. Euphytica 176:59–78Google Scholar
  52. Hanna WW (1987) Utilization of wild relatives of pearl millet. In: Witcombe JR, Beckerman SR (eds) Proceedings of the International Pearl millet workshop, Patancheru, India, 7–11 Apr 1986, ICRISAT, Patancheru, pp 33–42Google Scholar
  53. Hastorf CA (2009) Rio Balsas most likely region for maize domestication. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:4957–495810PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Horsley RD, Hochhalter M (2004) Barley agronomy. In: Wrigley CW, Corke H, Walker C (eds) Encyclopedia of grain science. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 38–45Google Scholar
  55. Hossain A, Teixeira da Silva JA (2012) Wheat production in Bangladesh: its future in the light of global warming. AoB Plants 5:pls042PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Jones H, Leigh FJ, Mackay I, Bower MA, Smith LM, Charles MP, Jones G, Jones MK, Brown TA, Powell W (2008) Population-based resequencing reveals that the flowering time adaptation of cultivated barley originated east of the Fertile Crescent. Mol Biol Evol 25:2211–2219PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Joshi PK, Singh NP, Singh NN, Gerpacio RV, Pingali PL (2005) Maize in India: production systems, constraints, and research priorities. CIMMYT, MexicoGoogle Scholar
  58. Knežević D, Pržulj N, Yečević V, Đukić N, Momčilović V, Maksimović D, Mićanović D, Dimitrijević B (2004) Breeding strategies for barley quality improvement and vide adaptation. Kragujevac J Sci 26:75–84Google Scholar
  59. Kumar A, Metwal M, Kaur S, Gupta AK, Puranik S, Singh S, Singh M, Gupta S, Babu BK, Sood S, Yadav R (2016) Nutraceutical value of finger millet [Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn.], and their improvement using omics approaches. Front Plant Sci 7:934PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. Lacy SM, Cleveland DA, Soleri D (2006) Farmer choice of Sorghum varieties in southern Mali. Hum Ecol 34:331–353Google Scholar
  61. Lema M, Felix A, Salako S, Cebert E, Bishnoi U (2001) Nutrient content and in vitro dry matter digestibility of silages made from various grain sorghum cultivars. J Appl Anim Res 19:129–136Google Scholar
  62. Longin CFH, Würschum T (2016) Back to the future- tapping into ancient grains for food diversity. Trends Plant Sci 21:731–737PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Maurya DM, Bottrall A, Farrington J (1988) Improved livelihoods, genetic diversity and farmer participation: a strategy for rice breeding in rainfed areas of India. Exp Agric 24:311–320Google Scholar
  64. McKevith B (2004) Nutritional aspects of cereals. Nutr Bull 29:111–142Google Scholar
  65. Morrell PL, Clegg MT (2007) Genetic evidence for a second domestication of barley (Hordeum vulgare) east of the fertile crescent. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:3289–3294PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Munns R, James R, Lauchli A (2006) Approaches to increasing the salt tolerance of wheat and other cereals. J Exp Bot 57:1025–1043PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Muñoz-Amatriaín M, Cuesta-Marcos A, Hayes PM, Muehlbauer GJ (2014) Barley genetic variation: implications for crop improvement. Brief Funct Genomics 13:341–350PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Nevo E (2006) Genome evolution of wild cereal diversity and prospects for crop improvement. Plant Genet Resour 4:36–46Google Scholar
  69. Nevo E, Beiles A, Gutterman Y, Storch N, Kaplan D (1984) Genetic resources of wild cereals in Israel and vicinity. II. Phenotypic variation within and between populations of wild barley, Hordeum spontaneum. Euphytica 33:737–756Google Scholar
  70. Nuss ET, Tanumihardjo SA (2010) Maize: a paramount staple crop in the context of global nutrition. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 9:417–436Google Scholar
  71. Pandit DB, Islam MM, Harun-Ur-Rashid M, Sufian MA (2007) Participatory variety selection in wheat and its impact on scaling-up seed dissemination and varietal diversity. Bangladesh J Agric Res 32:473–486Google Scholar
  72. Pêgo S (1996) Maize genetic resources in Portugal. In: Lipman E, Ellis RH, Gass T (eds) Maize genetic resources in Europe. Report of a workshop, 28–29 May 1996. IPGRI, Rome, Italy, pp 52–54Google Scholar
  73. Peng JH, Sun D, Nevo E (2011) Domestication evolution, genetics and genomics in wheat. Mol Breed 28:281–301Google Scholar
  74. Perales HR, Benz BF, Brush SB (2005) Maize diversity and ethnolinguistic diversity in Chiapas, Mexico. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:949–954PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Perazzo AF, Carvalho GGP, Santos EM, Bezerra HFC, Silva TC, Pereira GA, Ramos RCS, Rodrigues JAS (2017) Agronomic evaluation of Sorghum hybrids for silage production cultivated in semiarid conditions. Front Plant Sci 8:1088PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  76. Prasanna BM (2012) Diversity in global maize germplasm: characterization and utilization. J Biosci 37:843–855PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Qamar M, Riaz-ud-din BD, Sohail M, Abbas SH, Ali S (2014) Participatory wheat varietal selection in Gilgit-Baltistan of Pakistan. Afr J Agric Res 9:775–783Google Scholar
  78. Ramya AR, Ahamed ML, Satyavathi CT, Rathore A, Katiyar P, Raj AGB, Kumar S, Gupta R, Mahendrakar MD, Yadav RS, Srivastava RK (2018) Towards defining heterotic gene pools in pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.]. Front Plant Sci 8:1934PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  79. Ranum P, Peña-Rosas JP, Garcia-Casal MN (2014) Global maize production, utilization, and consumption. Ann NY Acad Sci 1312:105–112PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Rao PP, Birthal PS, Reddy BV, Rai KN, Ramesh S (2006) Diagnostics of sorghum and pearl millet grains-based nutrition in India. Int Sorghum Millets Newslett 47:93–96Google Scholar
  81. Reguieg MM, Labdi M, Benbelkacem A, Hamou M, Maatougui MEH, Grando S, Ceccarelli S (2013) First experience on participatory barley breeding in Algeria. J Crop Improv 27:469–486Google Scholar
  82. Sandhu KS, Singh N, Malhi NS (2007) Some properties of corn grains and their flours I: Physicochemical, functional and chapati-making properties of flours. Food Chem 101:938–946Google Scholar
  83. Sawers RJH, Sanchez Leon NL (2011) Origins of maize: a further paradox resolved. Front Genet 2:53PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  84. Schulte D, Close TJ, Graner A, Langridge P, Matsumoto T, Muehlbauer G, Sato K, Schulman AH, Waugh R, Wise RP, Stein N (2009) The international barley sequencing consortium- at the threshold of efficient access to the barley genome. Plant Physiol 149:142–147PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  85. Serba DD, Perumal R, Tesso TT, Min D (2017) Status of global pearl millet breeding programs and the way forward. Crop Sci 57:2891–2905Google Scholar
  86. Sharma D, Jamra G, Singh UM, Sood S, Kumar A (2017) Calcium biofortification: three pronged molecular approaches for dissecting complex trait of calcium nutrition in finger millet (Eleusine coracana) for devising strategies of enrichment of food crops. Front Plant Sci 7:2028PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  87. Shivhare R, Lata C (2016) Selection of suitable reference genes for assessing gene expression in pearl millet under different abiotic stresses and their combinations. Sci Rep 6:23036PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  88. Smith ME, Castillo FG, Gómez F (2001) Participatory plant breeding with maize in Mexico and Honduras. Euphytica 122:551–565Google Scholar
  89. Soleri D, Cleveland DA (2004) Farmer selction and conservation of crop varieties. In: Goodman RM (ed) Encyclopedia of plant and crop science. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 433–438Google Scholar
  90. Soleri D, Cleveland DA, Smith SE, Ceccarelli S, Grando S, Rana RB, Rijal D, Rios Labrada H (2002) Understanding farmers’ knowledge as the basis for collaboration with plant breeders: methodological development and examples from ongoing research in Mexico, Syria, Cuba, and Nepal. In: Cleveland DA, Soleri D (eds) Farmers, scientists and plant breeding: integrating knowledge and practice. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 19–60Google Scholar
  91. Stanca AM, Gianinetti A, Rizza F, Terzi V (2016) Barley: an overview of a versatile cereal grain with many food and feed uses. In: Wrigley CW, Corke H, Seetharaman K, Faubion J (eds) Encyclopedia of food grains, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 147–152Google Scholar
  92. Su-jiang Z, Chaudhry AS, Ramdani D, Osman A, Xue-feng G, Edwards GR, Cheng L (2016) Chemical composition and in vitro fermentation characteristics of high sugar forage sorghum as an alternative to forage maize for silage making in Tarim Basin, China. J Integr Agric 15:175–182Google Scholar
  93. Sweeney M, McCouch S (2007) The complex history of the domestication of rice. Ann Bot 100:951–957PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  94. Tenaillon MI, Charcosset A (2011) A European perspective on maize history. Comp Rendus Biol 334:221–228Google Scholar
  95. Truswell AS (2002) Cereal grains and coronary heart disease. Eur J Clin Nutr 56:1–14PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Vaz Patto MC, Moreira PM, Almeida N, Satovic Z, Pêgo S (2008) Genetic diversity evolution through participatory maize breeding in Portugal. Euphytica 161:283–291Google Scholar
  97. Vaz Patto MC, Mendes-Moreira PM, Alves ML, Mecha E, Brites C, do Rosario Bronze M, Pêgo S (2013) Participatory plant quality breeding: an ancient art revisited by knowledge sharing. In: Andersen SB (ed) The Portuguese experience. Plant breeding from laboratories to fields. InTech, Rijeka, Croatia, pp 255–288Google Scholar
  98. vom Brocke K, Weltzien E, Christinck A, Presterl T, Geiger HH (2003) Effects of farmers’ seed management on performance and adaptation of pearl millet in Rajasthan, India. Euphytica 130:267–280Google Scholar
  99. vom Brocke K, Trouche G, Weltzien E, Barro-Kondombo CP, Gozé E, Chantereau J (2010) Participatory variety development for sorghum in Burkina Faso: farmers’ selection and farmers’ criteria. Field Crop Res 119:183–194Google Scholar
  100. vom Brocke K, Trouche G, Weltzien E, Barro CPK, Sidibé A, Zougmoré R (2014) Helping farmers adapt to climate and cropping system change through increased access to sorghum genetic resources adapted to prevalent sorghum cropping systems in Burkina Faso. Exp Agric 50:284–305Google Scholar
  101. Wang RL, Stec A, Hey J, Lukens L, Doebley J (1999) The limits of selection during maize domestication. Nature 398:236–239PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  102. Wang H, Nussbaum-Wagler T, Li B, Zhao Q, Vigouroux Y, Faller M, Bomblies K, Lukens L, Doebley JF (2005) The origin of the naked grains of maize. Nature 436:714–719PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  103. Weltzien E, Christinck A, Touré A, Rattunde F, Diarra M, Sangaré A, Coulibaly M (2007) Enhancing farmers’ access to sorghum varieties through scaling-up participatory plant breeding in Mali, West Africa. In: Almekinders C, Hardon J (eds) Bringing farmers back into breeding. Experiences with participatory plant breeding and challenges for institutionalisation. Agromisa Special 5, Agromisa Wageningen, pp 58–69Google Scholar
  104. Witcombe JR, Parr LB, Atlin GN (2002) Breeding rainfed rice for drought-prone environments: integrating conventional and participatory plant breeding in South and Southeast Asia. In: Proceedings of a DFID plant sciences research programme/IRRI Conference, 12–15 March 2002, IRRI Los Banos, Laguna, PhilippinesGoogle Scholar
  105. Witcombe JR, Joshi A, Goyal SN (2003) Participatory plant breeding in maize: a case study from Gujarat, India. Euphytica 130:413–422Google Scholar
  106. Youssef HM, Mascher M, Ayoub MA, Stein N, Kilian B, Schnurbusch T (2017) Natural diversity of inflorescence architecture traces cryptic domestication genes in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Genet Resour Crop Evol 64:843–853Google Scholar
  107. Zohary D, Hopf M, Weiss E (2012) Domestication of plants in the old world: the origin and spread of domesticated plants in southwest Asia, Europe, and the Mediterranean basin. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Atul Bhargava
    • 1
  • Shilpi Srivastava
    • 2
  1. 1.Amity Institute of BiotechnologyAmity University Uttar Pradesh (Lucknow Campus)LucknowIndia
  2. 2.Amity Institute of BiotechnologyAmity University Uttar Pradesh (Lucknow Campus)LucknowIndia

Personalised recommendations