Advertisement

Toward Participatory Plant Breeding

  • Atul Bhargava
  • Shilpi Srivastava
Chapter

Abstract

Green Revolution was a huge success that spearheaded agricultural research for several decades and played an important role in feeding the world by significantly increasing food production mainly in the developing countries. However, in spite of immense turnaround in productivity through Green Revolution, conventional plant breeding has done little to improve the life of subsistence farmers across continents. Formal breeding programs have primarily catered the well-off farmers, and the poor farmers have not reaped the desired benefits. The poor and marginal farmers of the developing countries are faced with problems like inequitable land distribution, insecure ownership, fragmentation of holdings, inadequate irrigation, poor credit facilities, improper marketing, and slow growth of allied sectors remained aloof from this spectacular phenomenon. Participatory plant breeding (PPB) is the development of a plant breeding program in collaboration between breeders and farmers, marketers, processors, consumers, and policymakers. In PPB, farmers and researchers work in tandem with farmers taking a lead role in the design, implementation, and evaluation of the breeding material. The chapter discusses at length the different forms of farmers’ participation in crop improvement.

Bibliography

  1. Almekinders CJM, Elings A (1999) Collaboration between breeders and farmers in different stages of the crop development process- discussion paper. Society of American Anthropology- Session PPB, April 22, 1999, Tuscon, ArizonaGoogle Scholar
  2. Almekinders CJM, Elings A (2001) Collaboration of farmers and breeders: participatory crop improvement in perspective. Euphytica 122:425–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anonymous (2002) WIRFP: Participatory plant breeding: concepts and examples. Gramin Vikas Trust, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  4. Atlin GN, Cooper M, Bjørnstad Å (2001) A comparison of formal and participatory breeding approaches using selection theory. Euphytica 122:463–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bänziger M, Cooper M (2001) Breeding for low input conditions and consequences for participatory plant breeding: examples from tropical maize and wheat. Euphytica 122:503–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Borlaug N (2007) Sixty-two years of fighting hunger: personal recollections. Euphytica 157:287–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Byerlee D (1996) Modern varieties, productivity, and sustainability: recent experience and emerging challenges. World Dev 24:697–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Byerlee D, Morris M (1993) Research for marginal environments: are we underinvested? Food Policy 18:381–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Byerlee D, Janvry AD, Sadoulet E (2009) Agriculture for development: toward a new paradigm. Ann Rev Resour Econ 1:15–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ceccarelli S (2012) Plant breeding with farmers- a technical manual. ICARDA, AleppoGoogle Scholar
  11. Ceccarelli S, Grando S (2007) Decentralized participatory plant breeding: an example of demand driven research. Euphytica 155:349–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ceccarelli S, Bailey E, Grando S, Tutwiler R (1997) Decentralized, participatory plant breeding: a link between formal plant breeding and small farmers. In: New frontiers in participatory research and gender analysis. Proceedings of the international seminar on participatory research and gender analysis for technology development. Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT), Cali, pp 65–74Google Scholar
  13. Christiaensen L, Demery L, Kuhl J (2011) The (evolving) role of agriculture in poverty reduction- an empirical perspective. J Dev Econ 96:239–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Courtois B, Singh RK, Pandey S, Piggin C, Paris T, Sarkarung S, Singh VP, McLaren G, Baghel SS, Sahu RK, Sahu VN, Sharma SK, Singh S, Singh HN, Singh A, Singh ON, Sisodia BVS, Mishra CH, Roy JK, Choudhary D, Prasad K, Singh RK, Sinha PK, Mandal NP (2000) Breeding better rainfed rice varieties through farmer participation: some early lessons from eastern India. In: Proceedings of 2nd International Sem of the CGIAR SWP on Participatory Research and Gender Analysis Quito, Equador, CIAT, Cali, Colombia, 6–9 September 1998Google Scholar
  15. Crossa J (2012) From genotype × environment interaction to gene × environment interaction. Curr Genomics 13:225–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Desclaux D, Nolot J, Chiffoleau Y, Goze E, Leclerc C (2008) Changes in the concept of genotype x environment interactions to fit agriculture diversification and decentralized participatory plant breeding: pluridisciplinary point of view. Euphytica 163:533–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Elings A, Almekinders CJM, Stam P (2001) Introduction: why focus the thinking on participatory plant breeding. Euphytica 122:423–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Evenson RE, Gollin D (2003) Assessing the impact of the Green Revolution, 1960 to 2000. Science 300:758–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. FAO (Food and Agricultural Organization) (2009) How to feed the world in 2050? FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  20. Fischer RA, Connor DJ (2018) Issues for cropping and agricultural science in the next 20 years. Field Crops Res 222:121–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fischer G, Shah M, Tubiello FN, van Velhuizen H (2005) Socio-economic and climate change impacts on agriculture: an integrated assessment, 1990–2080. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 360:2067–2083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Franzel S, Coe R (2002) Participatory on-farm technology testing: the suitability of different types of trials for different objectives. In: Bellon MR, Reeves J (eds) Quantitative analysis of data from participatory methods in plant breeding. CIMMYT, MexicoGoogle Scholar
  23. Fu Y-B (2015) Understanding crop genetic diversity under modern plant breeding. Theor Appl Genet 128:2131–2142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gibson RW, Mpembe I, Mwanga ROM (2011) Benefits of participatory plant breeding (PPB) as exemplified by the first-ever officially released PPB-bred sweet potato cultivar. J Agric Sci (Cambridge) 149:625–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Halewood M, Deupmann P, Sthapit B, Vernooy R, Ceccarelli S (2007) Participatory plant breeding to promote farmers’ rights. Biodiversity International, RomeGoogle Scholar
  26. Huang X, Wolf M, Ganal MW, Orford S, Koebner RMD, Roder MS (1996) Did modern plant breeding lead to genetic erosion in European winter wheat varieties? Crop Sci 47:343–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jarvis DI, Fadda C, Santis P, Thompson J (2011) Damage, diversity and genetic vulnerability: the role of crop genetic diversity in the agricultural production system to reduce pest and disease damage. In: Proceedings of an International Symposium, Rabat, Morocco, 15–17 February 2011Google Scholar
  28. Joshi A, Witcombe JR (1996) Farmer participatory crop improvement II. Participatory varietal selection, a case of India. Exp Agric 32:461–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Joshi KD, Witcombe JR (2002) Participatory varietal selection in rice in Nepal in favourable agricultural environments- a comparison of two methods assessed by varietal adoption. Euphytica 127:445–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Joshi KD, Sthapit BR, Witcombe JR (2001) How narrowly adapted are the products of decentralised breeding? The spread of rice varieties from a participatory plant breeding programme in Nepal. Euphytica 122:589–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Joshi KD, Musa AM, Johansen C, Gyawali S, Harris D, Witcombe JR (2007) Highly client-oriented breeding, using local preferences and selection, produces widely adapted rice varieties. Field Crops Res 100:107–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lantican MA, Pingali P, Rajaram S (2003) Is research on marginal lands catching up? The case of unfavourable wheat growing environments. Agric Econ 29:353–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Manamgoda DS, Cai L, McKenzie EHC, Crous PW, Madrid H, Chukeatirote E, Shivas RG, Tan YP, Hyde KD (2012) A phylogenetic and taxonomic re-evaluation of the Bipolaris – Cochliobolus – Curvularia complex. Fungal Divers 56:131–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Manamgoda DS, Rossman AY, Castlebury LA, Crous PW, Madrid H, Chukeatirote E, Hyde KD (2014) The genus Bipolaris. Stud Mycol 79:221–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Marshall DR (1977) The advantages and hazards of genetic homogeneity. In: Day PR (ed) The genetic basis of epidemics in agriculture. New York Academy of Sciences, New York, pp 1–20Google Scholar
  36. McGuire S, Manicad G, Sperling L (1999) A global analysis of issues and current experiences. CGIAR System wide program on participatory research, working document No 2, Cali, ColumbiaGoogle Scholar
  37. Morris ML, Bellon MR (2004) Participatory plant breeding research: opportunities and challenges for the international crop improvement system. Euphytica 136:21–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Morris ML, Heisey PL (2003) Estimating the benefits of plant breeding research: methodological issues and practical challenges. Agric Econ J Int Assoc Agric Econ 29:241–252Google Scholar
  39. NRC (National Research Council) (1993) Managing global genetic resources: agricultural crop issues and policies. The National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  40. Pingali PL (2012) Green Revolution: impacts, limits, and the path ahead. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:12302–12308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pontius J, Dilts R, Bartlett A (2000) Ten years of building community: from farmer field schools to community IPM. FAO Community IPM Program, JakartaGoogle Scholar
  42. Prohens J (2011) Plant breeding: a success story to be continued thanks to the advances in genomics. Front Plant Sci 2:51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rahman S (2015) Green Revolution in India: environmental degradation and impact on livestock. Asian J Water Environ Poll 12:75–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Safeeulla KM (1977) Genetic vulnerability: the basis of recent epidemics in India. In: Day PR (ed) The genetic basis of epidemics in agriculture. The New York Academy of Sciences, New York, pp 72–85Google Scholar
  45. Schumann GL, D’Arcy CJ (2000) Late blight of potato and tomato. The Plant Health InstructorGoogle Scholar
  46. Sharma JR (2001) Principles and practice of plant breeding. Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Limited, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  47. Shelton AC, Tracy WF (2016) Participatory plant breeding and organic agriculture: a synergistic model for organic variety development in the United States. Elementa 4:1–13Google Scholar
  48. Singh RP, Hodson DP, Jin Y, Lagudah ES, Ayliffe MA, Bhavani S, Rouse MN, Pretorius ZA, Szabo LJ, Huerta-Espino J, Basnet BR, Lan C, Hovmøller MS (2015) Emergence and spread of new races of wheat stem rust fungus: continued threat to food security and prospects of genetic control. Phytopathology 105:872–884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Soleri D, Smith S, Cleveland D (1999) Evaluating the potential for farmer-breeders collaboration: a case study of farmer maize selection from Oaxaca, Mexico, AgGren network paper 96a. Overseas Development Institute, London, pp 1–8Google Scholar
  50. Sperling L, Ashby JA, Smith ME, Weltzien E, McGuire S (2001) A framework for analyzing participatory plant breeding approaches and results. Euphytica 122:439–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Stevenson WR (1993) Management of early blight and late blight. In: Rowe RC (ed) Potato health management. American Phytopathological Society Press, St. Paul, pp 141–147Google Scholar
  52. Tester M, Langridge P (2010) Breeding technologies to increase crop production in a changing world. Science 327:818–822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tripp R (1996) Biodiversity and modern crop varieties: sharpening the debate. Agric Hum Values 13:48–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. van de Wouw M, Kik C, van Hintum T, van Treuren R, Visser B (2010a) Genetic erosion in crops: concept, research results and challenges. Plant Genet Resour 8:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. van de Wouw M, van Hintum T, Kik C, van Treuren R, Visser B (2010b) Genetic diversity trends in twentieth century crop cultivars: a meta analysis. Theor Appl Genet 120:1241–1252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Welch RM, Graham RD (2000) A new paradigm for world agriculture: productive, sustainable, nutritious, healthful food systems. Food Nutr Bull 21:361–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. White S (1996) Depoliticising development: the uses and abuses of participation. Dev Prac 6:6–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Witcombe JR, Virk DS (2001) Number of crosses and population size for participatory and classical plant breeding. Euphytica 122:451–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Witcombe JR, Joshi A, Joshi KD, Sthapit BR (1996) Farmer participatory crop improvement I: varietal selection and breeding methods and their impact on biodiversity. Exp Agric 32:445–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Atul Bhargava
    • 1
  • Shilpi Srivastava
    • 2
  1. 1.Amity Institute of BiotechnologyAmity University Uttar Pradesh (Lucknow Campus)LucknowIndia
  2. 2.Amity Institute of BiotechnologyAmity University Uttar Pradesh (Lucknow Campus)LucknowIndia

Personalised recommendations