Skip to main content

Robust Optimal Trajectory Planning Under Uncertain Winds and Convective Risk

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Air Traffic Management and Systems III (EIWAC 2017)

Abstract

The existence of significant uncertainties in the models and systems required for trajectory prediction represents a major challenge for the Trajectory-Based Operations concept. Weather can be considered as one of the most relevant sources of uncertainty. Understanding and managing the impact of these uncertainties are necessary in order to increase the predictability of the ATM system. We present preliminary results on robust trajectory planning in which weather is assumed to be the unique source of uncertainty. State-of-the-art probabilistic forecasts from Ensemble Prediction Systems are employed to characterize uncertainty in the wind and potential convective areas. A robust optimal control methodology to produce efficient and predictable trajectories in the presence of these uncertainties is presented. A set of Pareto-optimal trajectories is obtained for different preferences between predictability, convective risk, and average efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    TBO-MET project (https://tbomet-h2020.com/) has received funding from the SESAR JU under grant agreement No 699294 under EU’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme. Consortium members are UNIVERSITY OF SEVILLE (Coordinator), AEMET (Agencia Española de Meteorología), METEOSOLUTIONS GmbH, PARIS-LODRON-UNIVERSITAT SALZBURG, and UNIVERSIDAD CARLOS III DE MADRID.

  2. 2.

    Attributable to National Weather Service Louisville, KY: http://www.weather.gov/lmk/indiceshttp://www.weather.gov/lmk/indices, accessed July 25, 2016.

  3. 3.

    ECMWF, Reading, UK, accessed July 25, 2016:

    http://www.ecmwf.int/en/research/modelling-and-prediction/atmospheric-physics http://www.ecmwf.int/en/research/modelling-and-prediction/atmospheric-physics.

  4. 4.

    The \(\le \) sign applies in an element-wise fashion in Eq. (5) and analogous equations.

  5. 5.

    Contrary to the usual definition, we take \(w_y\) to be in a South to North direction.

  6. 6.

    http://apps.ecmwf.int/datasets/.

References

  1. Casado E, Goodchild C, Vilaplana M. Sensitivity of trajectory prediction accuracy to aircraft performance uncertainty. In: Proceedings of the AIAA INFOTECH@AEROSPACE (I@A) CONFERENCE

    Google Scholar 

  2. Vazquez R, Rivas D (2013) Propagation of initial mass uncertainty in aircraft cruise flight. J Guid, Control, Dyn 36(2):415–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Casado E, Vilaplana M, Goodchild C (2013) Sensitivity of continuous climb departure predictions to aircraft intent uncertainties. In: 3th international conference on application and theory of automation in command and control systems

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gonzalez-Arribas D, Soler M, Sanjurjo M (2016) Wind-based robust trajectory optimization using meteorological ensemble probabilistic forecasts. In: SESAR innovation days 2016 (SIDs 2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gonzalez-Arribas D, Soler M, Sanjurjo-Rivo M (2018) Robust aircraft trajectory planning under wind uncertainty using optimal control. J Guid, Control, Dyn 41(3):673–688. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G002928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hacker JP, Krayenhoff ES, Stull RB (2003) Ensemble experiments on numerical weather prediction error and uncertainty for a north pacific forecast failure. Weather Forecast 18(1):12–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bauer P, Thorpe A, Brunet G (2015) The quiet revolution of numerical weather prediction. Nature 525(7567):47–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cheung J, Brenguier J-L, Heijstek J, Marsman A, Wells H (2014) Sensitivity of flight durations to uncertainties in numerical weather prediction. In: SESAR innovation days

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cheung J, Hally A, Heijstek J, Marsman A, Brenguier J-L (2015) Recommendations on trajectory selection in flight planning based on weather uncertainty. In: Proceedings of 5th SESAR innovation days (SID2015), Bologna, Italy, pp 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  10. Vazquez R, Rivas D, Franco A (2017) Stochastic analysis of fuel consumption in aircraft cruise subject to along-track wind uncertainty. Aerosp Sci Technol 66:304–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Legrand K, Puechmorel S, Delahaye D, Zhu Y (2016) Aircraft trajectory planning under wind uncertainties. In: Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC), 2016 IEEE/AIAA 35th. IEEE, pp 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  12. Carbone R, Tuttle J, Ahijevych D, Trier S (2002) Inferences of predictability associated with warm season precipitation episodes. J Atmos Sci 59(13):2033–2056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ellrod G, Field G (1984) The characteristics and prediction of gulf stream thunderstorms. In: Conference on Weather Forecasting and Analysis, 10 th Clearwater Beach, FL, pp 15–21

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tiedtke M (1989) A comprehensive mass flux scheme for cumulus parameterization in large-scale models. Mon Weather Rev 117(8):1779–1800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bechtold P, Köhler M, Jung T, Doblas-Reyes F, Leutbecher M, Rodwell MJ, Vitart F, Balsamo G (2008) Advances in simulating atmospheric variability with the ecmwf model: From synoptic to decadal time-scales. Q J R Meteorol Soc 134(634):1337–1351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bechtold P, Semane N, Lopez P, Chaboureau J-P, Beljaars A, Bormann N (2014) Representing equilibrium and nonequilibrium convection in large-scale models. J Atmos Sci 71(2):734–753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ross IM, Proulx RJ, Karpenko M, Gong Q (2015) Riemann–stieltjes optimal control problems for uncertain dynamic systems. J Guid, Control, Dyn 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  18. Li X, Nair PB, Zhang Z, Gao L, Gao C (2014) Aircraft robust trajectory optimization using nonintrusive polynomial chaos. J Aircr 51(5):1592–1603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fisher J, Bhattacharya R (2011) Optimal trajectory generation with probabilistic system uncertainty using polynomial chaos. J Dyn Syst, Meas, Control 133(1):014501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Flanzer TC, Bower GC, Kroo IM (2012) Robust trajectory optimization for dynamic soaring. In: AIAA guidance, navigation, and control conference, p 4603

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nuic A (2010) User manual for the base of aircraft data (bada) rev 3.11. Atmosphere 2010:001

    Google Scholar 

  22. Betts JT (2010) Practical methods for optimal control and estimation using nonlinear programming, vol 19. Siam

    Google Scholar 

  23. Andersson J, Åkesson J, Diehl M (2012) Casadi: A symbolic package for automatic differentiation and optimal control. In: Recent advances in algorithmic differentiation. Springer, Berlin, pp 297–307

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Hart WE, Watson J-P, Woodruff DL (2011) Pyomo: modeling and solving mathematical programs in python. Math Program Comput 3(3):219–260

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Wächter A, Biegler LT (2006) On the implementation of an interior-point filter line-search algorithm for large-scale nonlinear programming. Math program 106(1):25–57

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been partially supported by project tbo-met project (https://tbomet-h2020.com/), which has received funding from the SESAR JU under grant agreement No 699294 under European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel González-Arribas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

González-Arribas, D. et al. (2019). Robust Optimal Trajectory Planning Under Uncertain Winds and Convective Risk. In: Electronic Navigation Research Institute (eds) Air Traffic Management and Systems III. EIWAC 2017. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 555. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7086-1_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7086-1_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-7085-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-7086-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics