Advertisement

Embedding Employability into an Information Technology Curriculum Using PebblePad: A Practice Report

  • David TuffleyEmail author
  • Gayle Brent
Chapter

Abstract

Commencing their university studies, students benefit from having clear career goals. A vision of their ideal future career can help an otherwise insecure student to cultivate the resilience and determination that endows the forward momentum to keep moving when the going gets tough. Goal-setting helps to re-frame their degree program in their minds as simply a means to an end, rather than an end in itself. A key aspect of this process is to embed a Career Action Plan as an integral element of the assessment plan. This detailed plan is implemented within PebblePad. In this chapter, we report on the experience and results of a pilot study using a PebblePad workbook Career Action Plan in 2017 with a cohort of first year, first semester information and communication technology (ICT) students in the course ‘Fundamentals of Information Technology’. It will be seen that the students found the usability of this approach to be beneficial, enabling them to produce an effective Career Action Plan sufficient to warrant the continued use of the method.

Keywords

Career Action Plan Goal-setting PebblePad First year experience Student retention Engagement strategy Practice report 

References

  1. Abouserie, R. (1994). Sources and levels of stress in relation to locus of control and self-esteem in university students. Educational Psychology, 14(3), 323–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrews, J., & Higson, H. (2008). Graduate employability, ‘soft skills’ versus ‘hard’ business knowledge: A European study. Higher Education in Europe, 33(4), 411–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Astin, A. (1993). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  4. Barron, K., & Harackiewicz, J. (2001). Achievement goals and optimal motivation: Testing multiple goal models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(5), 706–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bridgstock, R. (2009). The graduate attributes we’ve overlooked: Enhancing graduate employability through career management skills. Higher Education Research & Development, 28(1), 31–44.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360802444347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chapman, E. (2003). Alternative approaches to assessing student engagement rates. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 8(13), 1–7.Google Scholar
  7. Coates, H., Hillman, J., Jackson, D., Tan, L., Daws, A., Rainsford, D., & Murphy, M. (2008). Attracting, engaging and retaining: New conversations about learning, Australasian Student Engagement Report (AUSSE), Camberwell: ACER.Google Scholar
  8. Duarte, N. (2010). Resonate: Present visual stories that transform audiences. Wiley.Google Scholar
  9. Ebner, M., Lienhardt, C., Rohs, M., & Meyer, I. (2010). Microblogs in higher education—A chance to facilitate informal and process-oriented learning. Computers & Education, 55(1), 92–100.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.12.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Erez, A., & Judge, T. (2001). Relationship of core self-evaluations to goal setting, motivation, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(6), 1270–1279.Google Scholar
  11. Foundation for Young Australians. (2017). The new work smarts: thriving in the new work order. https://www.fya.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/FYA_TheNewWorkSmarts_July2017.pdf. Accessed 16 November 2018.
  12. Gartner Group. (2017). By 2020, Artificial intelligence will create more jobs than it eliminates. Retrieved November 16, 2018, from https://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/3837763.
  13. Gifford, D. D., Briceno-Perriott, J., & Mianzo, F. (2006). Locus of control: Academic achievement and retention in a sample of university first-year students. Journal of College Admission, 191, 18–25.Google Scholar
  14. Gilbert, R., Balatti, J., Turner, P., & Whitehouse, H. (2004). The generic skills debate in research higher degrees. Higher Education Research & Development, 23(3), 375–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hockings, C., Cooke, S., Yamashita, H., McGinty, S., & Bowl, M. (2008). Switched off: A study of disengagement among computing students at two universities. Research Papers in Education, 23(2), 191–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Leong, R., & Kavanagh, M. (2013). A work integrated learning (WIL) framework to develop graduate skills and attributes in an Australian university’s accounting program. Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 14(1), 1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2018.1454333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Krause, K. (2005). Engaged, inert or otherwise occupied? Deconstructing the 21st century undergraduate student. Keynote paper presented at James Cook University Symposium: Sharing Scholarship in Learning and Teaching—Engaging Students. James Cook University, QLD, Australia, 21–22 September 2005. www.griffith.edu.au/gihe. Accessed 16 November 2018.
  18. Kuh, G. (2002). The National Survey of student engagement: Conceptual framework and overview of psychometric properties. Retrieved June 25, 2013, from http://nsse.iub.edu/pdf/conceptual_framework_2003.pdf.
  19. Laird, T., & Kuh, G. (2005). Student experiences with information technology and their relationship to other aspects of student engagement. Research in Higher Education, 46(2), 211–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lizzio, A., & Wilson, K. (2004). First-year students’ perceptions of capability. Studies in Higher Education, 29(1), 109–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lizzio, A. (2006). Designing an orientation and transition strategy for commencing students. A conceptual summary of research and practice. First year experience project. Griffith University, Brisbane.Google Scholar
  22. Long, M., Ferrier, F., & Heagney, M. (2006). Stay, play or give it away? Students continuing, changing or leaving university study in first year. Centre for the Economics of Education and Training: Monash University.Google Scholar
  23. Lounsbury, J. W., Park, S. H., Sundstrom, E., Williamson, J. M., & Pemberton, A. E. (2004). Personality, career satisfaction, and life satisfaction: Test of a directional model. Journal of Career Assessment, 12(4), 395–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lüdtke, O., Roberts, B. W., Trautwein, U., & Nagy, G. (2011). A random walk down university avenue: life paths, life events, and personality trait change at the transition to university life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(3), 620–637.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McKenzie, S., Coldwell-Neilson, J., & Palmer, S. (2017). Informing the career development of IT students by understanding their career aspirations and skill development action plans. Australian Journal of Career Development, 26(1), 14–23.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1038416217697972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Miller, C. L. (2017). Career Action Plan: Applying analytical thinking skills in an online career development course. Career Planning & Adult Development Journal33(1).Google Scholar
  27. Miri, B., David, B. C., & Uri, Z. (2007). Purposely teaching for the promotion of higher-order thinking skills: A case of critical thinking. Research in Science Education, 37(4), 353–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students (Vol. 2). A third decade of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  29. Pitkethly, A., & Prosser, M. (2010). The first year experience project: A model for university-wide change. Higher Education Research & Development, 20(2), 185–198.  https://doi.org/10.1080/758483470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rayner, G., & Papakonstantinou, T. (2015). Employer perspectives of the current and future value of STEM graduate skills and attributes: An Australian study. Journal of Teaching and Learning for Graduate Employability, 6(1), 100–115.  https://doi.org/10.21153/jtlge2015vol6no1art576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Robbins, J. (2016). Designing a faculty-wide PebblePad strategy for future readiness. In A. Poot (Ed.) Future ready: Equipping learners for the journey ahead. A collection of case studies from PebbleBash 2016 (pp. 86–93). Telford, UK: Pebble Learning Ltd.Google Scholar
  32. Savickas, M. L., Nota, L., Rossier, J., Dauwalder, J. P., Duarte, M. E., Guichard, J., & Van Vianen, A. E. (2009). Life designing: A paradigm for career construction in the 21st century. Journal of Vocational Behavior75(3), 239-250.Google Scholar
  33. The Future Laboratory. (2016). Retrieved November 17, 2018, from http://enterprise.blob.core.windows.net/whitepapers/futureproof_tomorrows_jobs.pdf.
  34. Tuffley, D., & Antonio, A. (2013). First year engagement & retention: A goal-setting approach. Journal of Information Technology Education, 12, 239–251.  https://doi.org/10.28945/1896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Weidman, J. C., Twale, D. J., & Stein, E. L. (2001). Socialization of graduate and professional students in higher education: A perilous passage? ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, 28(3). San Francisco, USA: Jossey-Bass, Publishers.Google Scholar
  36. Wong, L. (2013). Student engagement with online resources and its impact on learning outcomes. Journal of Information Technology Education; Innovations in Practice, 12, 129–146.  https://doi.org/10.28945/1829.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Information and Communication TechnologyGriffith UniversitySouthportAustralia
  2. 2.Office of the PVC (Griffith Sciences), Griffith UniversitySouthportAustralia

Personalised recommendations