Advertisement

Creating a Successful Implementation of PebblePad: The University Context

  • Chris CampbellEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

As part of a university-wide implementation of PebblePad, staff in Griffith Sciences now have access to a cutting-edge platform which they can use to engage their students in a variety of learning activities. PebblePad is an advanced commercial ePortfolio, and personal learning network platform that allows students to complete a variety of tasks to enhance their learning. This chapter will detail the university-wide implementation and the implications for academics in the University and Griffith Science’s Group. The university-wide implementation has been led by academics in the sciences who were already using other platforms. Their experience enabled academics to create superior learning designs to implement with this platform. Initially, academics were invited to be part of the university-wide Innovator Group which allowed for training and support to be provided throughout the year and on a just-in-time basis. Data is presented in this chapter from the university-wide implementation of both students and staff. Usage data over time is also presented. Overall, the implementation of PebblePad throughout Sciences has been successful with the uptake described in the chapter.

Keywords

ePortfolios PebblePad University-wide Implementation Griffith University 

References

  1. Allan, C. N., Campbell, C., & Green, D. (2018). Nurturing the budding ideas of STEM academics in a university-wide implementation of PebblePad. In Proceedings of International Conference on Information, Communication Technologies in Education (pp. 39–48). Crete, Greece.Google Scholar
  2. Baronak, W. (2011). Teacher candidate perceptions of electronic portfolios. (PhD) West Virginia University.Google Scholar
  3. Blair, H., Campbell, C., & Duffy, M. (2017). A multi-pronged approach to the enterprise-wide implementation of a personal learning environment. In Proceedings of 2017 ePortfolio Forum: Owning, Supporting and Sharing the Journey (pp. 9–17). https://eportfoliosaustralia.files.wordpress.com/2017/09/ebook_eportfolioforum_2017_papers_v1_20170907.pdf. Accessed 5 May 2018.
  4. Botterill, M., Allan, G., & Brooks, S. (2008). Building community: Introducing ePortfolios in university education. In Hello! Where are you in the landscape of educational technology? Proceedings Ascilite Melbourne 2008. http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/melbourne08/procs/botterill-poster.pdf. Accessed 20 May 2018.
  5. Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Branch, R. M., & Merrill, M. D. (2012). Characteristics of instructional design models. In R. A. Reiser & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (3rd ed., pp. 8–16). Florida: Pearson.Google Scholar
  7. Brooks, W. (2017). The roles and features of ePortfolios in two Australian initial teacher education degree programs. In J. Rowley (Ed.), ePortfolios in Australian Universities (pp. 99–116). Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Campbell, C., & Blair, H. C. (2018). The role of professional Staff in the implementation of an ePortfolio system. In Proceedings of 2018 ePortfolio forum: Exploring, experiencing, engaging, energising, expanding (pp. 11–16). https://eportfoliosaustralia.files.wordpress.com/2018/10/2018-eportfolio-forum-ebook-of-short-papers-071018.pdf. Accessed 5th November 2018.
  9. Campbell, C., Bourke, J., Trahar, P., & Nisova, K. (2017). University-wide implementation: Supporting the innovators program and working collaboratively with faculties. In Proceedings of 2017 ePortfolio Forum: Owning, Supporting and Sharing the Journey (pp. 18–26). https://eportfoliosaustralia.files.wordpress.com/2017/09/ebook_eportfolioforum_2017_papers_v1_20170907.pdf. Accessed 5 May 2018.
  10. Campbell, C., & Korf, A. (2018). Supporting student learning through innovative technology in the aviation classroom. In ICICTE Proceedings 2018 (pp. 18–28), Corfu, Greece. http://www.icicte.org/assets/1.3_campbell_korf.pdf. Accessed 20 September 2018.
  11. Coffey, U., & Ashford-Rowe, K. (2014). The changing landscape of ePortfolios: A case study in one Australian university. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(3), 284–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Culatta, R. (2018). ADDIE model. http://www.instructionaldesign.org/models/addie/. Accessed 15 September 2018.
  13. Gustafson, K. L., & Branch, R. M. (2002). Survey of instructional development models (4th ed.). Syracuse University: ERIC Clearninghouse on Information Resources.Google Scholar
  14. Jenson, J. D. (2011). Promoting self-regulation and critical reflection through writing students’ use of electronic portfolio. IJeP: International Journal of ePortfolio, 1(1), 49–60.Google Scholar
  15. Krause, K. L. (2006). ePortfolios for graduate students: A discussion paper. Centre for the Study of Higher Education: University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
  16. Light, T. P., Chen, H. L., & Ittelson, J. C. (2012). Documenting learning with ePortfolios: A guide for college instructors. San Francisco: Wiley.Google Scholar
  17. Lorenzo, G., & Ittelson, J. C. (2005). An overview of E-Portfolios, EDUCAUSE learning initiative paper 1. https://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ELI3001.pdf. Accessed 6 October 2016.
  18. Luera, G., Brunvard, S., & Marra, T. (2016). Challenges and rewards of implementing ePortfolios through a bottom-up approach. IJeP: International Journal of ePortfolio, 6(2), 127–137.Google Scholar
  19. Masters, J. (2013). Scaffolding pre-service teachers representing their learning journeys with eportfolios. Journal of Learning Design, 6(1), 1–9.  https://doi.org/10.5204/jld.v6i1.115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Munday, J., Rowley, J., & Polly, P. (2017). The use of visual images in building professional self identities. IJeP: International Journal of ePortfolio, 7(1), 53–65.Google Scholar
  21. Oakley, G., Pegrum, M., & Johnston, S. (2014). Introducing e-portfolios to pre-service teachers as tools for reflection and growth: Lessons learnt. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 42(1), 36–50.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2013.854860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pebble Learning. (2018). PebblePad features. Retrieved from https://www.pebblepad.co.uk/features.aspx.
  23. Slade, C. (2015). Early student aspirations of using ePortfolios. In Association for Tertiary Education Management and Tertiary Education Facilities Managers’ Association Conference (pp. 185–194). Lidcombe, Australia: ATEM & TEFMA.Google Scholar
  24. Smart, V., Sim, C., & Finger, G. (2015). Professional standards based digital portfolios vs. evidence based digital portfolios: Recommendations for creative, interesting and long-lasting digital portfolios. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2015 (pp. 1875–1882). https://www.learntechlib.org/p/150256. Accessed 30 August 2018.
  25. The University of Edinburgh. (2017). Why you should use PebblePad. https://www.ed.ac.uk/information-services/learning-technology/portfolios/why-pebblepad. Accessed 21 August 2018.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Learning FuturesGriffith UniversityNathanAustralia

Personalised recommendations