Advertisement

Supporting the M in STEM Using Online Maths Support Modules

  • Wendy A. LoughlinEmail author
  • Peter R. Johnston
  • Christopher L. Brown
  • Dianne J. Watters
Chapter

Abstract

Recently, a range of mathematics support centres and online approaches have emerged in order to address the well-recognised limitations in the mathematical skills of STEM undergraduates (Jackson & Johnson, 2013). Whilst these approaches are often stand-alone without a discipline-specific context, studies have shown that students reported a positive impact of mathematics support on retention, confidence, performance and ability to cope with the various mathematical demands of their courses (Hillock, Jennings, Roberts, & Scharaschkin, 2013; Ní Fhloinn, Fitzmaurice, Mac an Bhaird, & O’Sullivan, 2014). We have developed and implemented a purely online, in-context mathematical support environment, placed in a chemistry and biochemistry context, with 24-h access, termed the Maths Skills Site (MSS), for STEM higher education students undertaking first-year science subjects (Johnston, Watters, Brown, & Loughlin, 2016; Loughlin, Johnston, Watters, Brown, & Harman, 2015). This chapter will review the development of current online learning support scenarios for mathematics in STEM and provide two case study analyses (first-year courses in chemistry and biochemistry), for the outcomes from two years of implementation. The findings from the case studies cover student perceptions, analysis of patterns of student usage of the MSS by mathematical topics and usage over time. Improvements were observed in student achievement of grades of five (credit), upon student usage of the MSS. Finally, we critique this approach to online active learning and identify future directions.

Keywords

Threshold mathematical skills Online learning support Science undergraduate students Chemistry Biochemistry 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the support of the David Green and David Harman for their invaluable assistance with the development of the Maths Skills Site. This work was supported by a University Learning and Teaching Grant.

References

  1. Adkins, M., & Noyes, A. (2018). Do advanced mathematics skills predict success in biology and chemistry degrees? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(3), 487–502.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-1006.2007.00032.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderton, R., Hine, G., & Joyce, C. (2017). Secondary school mathematics and science matters: Academic performance for secondary students transitioning into university allied health and science courses. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 25(1), 34–47.Google Scholar
  3. Armstrong, S., Brown, S., & Thompson, G. (Eds.). (2013). Motivating students. Oxford and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Ashcraft, M. H., & Moore, A. M. (2009). Mathematics anxiety and the affective drop in performance. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 27(3), 197–205.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282908330580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bain, K., & Towns, M. H. (2016). A review of research on the teaching and learning of chemical kinetics. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(2), 246–262.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RP00176E.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Becker, N., & Towns, M. (2012). Students’ understanding of mathematical expressions in physical chemistry contexts: An analysis using Sherin’s symbolic forms. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 13(3), 209–220.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C2RP00003B.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Schmid, R. F., Tamim, R. M., & Abrami, P. C. (2014). A meta-analysis of blended learning and technology use in higher education: From the general to the applied. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26(1), 87–122.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-013-9077-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bradforth, S. E., Miller, E. R., Dichtel, W. R., Leibovich, A. K., Feig, A. L., Martin, D., … & Smith, T. L. (2015). University learning: Improve undergraduate science education. Nature523(7560), 282-285.Google Scholar
  9. Broadbent, J., & Poon, W. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen, Y., Johri, A., & Rangwala, H. (2018). Running out of STEM: A comparative study across STEM majors of college students at-risk of dropping out early. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 270–279). ACM. Retrieved July 31, 2018, from https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=3170410.
  11. Cho, M. H., & Heron, M. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning: The role of motivation, emotion, and use of learning strategies in students’ learning experiences in a self-paced online mathematics course. Distance Education, 36(1), 80–99.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2015.1019963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Crisp, G., Nora, A., & Taggart, A. (2009). Student characteristics, pre-college, and environmental factors as predictors of majoring in and earning a STEM degree: An analysis of students attending a Hispanic serving institution. American Educational Research Journal, 46, 924–942.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209349460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cromley, J. G., Perez, T., & Kaplan, A. (2016). Undergraduate STEM achievement and retention: Cognitive, motivational, and institutional factors and solutions. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(1), 4–11.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732215622648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Donovan, W. J., & Wheland, E. R. (2009). Comparisons of success and retention in a general chemistry course before and after the adoption of a mathematics prerequisite. School Science and Mathematics, 109(7), 371–382.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2009.tb17868.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dziuban, C., Moskal, P., Johnson, C., & Evans, D. (2017). Adaptive learning: A tale of two contexts. Current Issues in Emerging eLearning, 4(1), 3.Google Scholar
  16. Er, S. N. (2017). Mathematics readiness of first-year college students and missing necessary skills: Perspectives of mathematics faculty. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 1–16, (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877x.2017.1332354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fong, K. E., Melguizo, T., & Prather, G. (2015). Increasing success rates in developmental math: The complementary role of individual and institutional characteristics. Research in Higher Education, 56(7), 719–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Green, A., & Sanderson, D. (2018). The roots of STEM achievement: An analysis of persistence and attainment in STEM majors. The American Economist, 63(1), 79–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Groen, L., Coupland, M., Langtry, T., Memar, J., Moore, B., & Stanley, J. (2015). The mathematics problem and mastery learning for first-year, undergraduate STEM students. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 11(1), 141–160.Google Scholar
  20. Hillock, P. W., Jennings, M., Roberts, A., & Scharaschkin, V. (2013). A mathematics support programme for first-year engineering students. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 44(7), 1030–1044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hine, G. (2017). Exploring reasons why Australian senior secondary students do not enrol in higher-level mathematics courses. In A. Downton, S. Livy, & J. Hall (Eds.), Proceedings of the 40th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. Melbourne, Australia (pp. 309–316). Adelaide, Australia: The Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia Inc.Google Scholar
  22. Hoban, R. A., Finlayson, O. E., & Nolan, B. C. (2013). Transfer in chemistry: A study of students’ abilities in transferring mathematical knowledge to chemistry. International Journal of Mathematics Education in Science and Technology, 44(1), 14–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hunt, D. N., & Lawson, D. A. (1996). Trends in mathematical competency of A-level students on entry to university. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications, 15(4), 167–173. Retrieved July 30, 2018, from https://merga.net.au/Public/Publications/Annual_Conference_Proceedings/2017_MERGA_annual_conference_proceedings.aspx.
  24. Ibabe, I., & Jauregizar, J. (2010). Online self-assessment with feedback and metacognitive knowledge. Journal of Higher Education, 59, 243–258.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9245-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jackson, D. C., & Johnson, E. D. (2013). A hybrid model of mathematics support for science students emphasizing basic skills and discipline relevance. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 44(6), 846–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jackson, D. C., Johnson, E. D., & Blanksby, T. M. (2014). A practitioner’s guide to implementing cross-disciplinary links in a mathematics support program. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 22(1), 67–80.Google Scholar
  27. Johnson, P., & O’Keeffe, L. (2016). The effect of a pre-university mathematics bridging course on adult learners’ self-efficacy and retention rates in STEM subjects. Irish Educational Studies, 35(3), 233–248.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2016.1192481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Johnston, P. R., Watters, D. J., Brown, C. L., & Loughlin, W. A. (2016). An investigation into student perceptions towards mathematics and their performance in first year chemistry: Introduction of online maths skills support. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(4), 1203–1214.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RP00175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jones, I., Wheadon, C., Humphries, S., & Inglis, M. (2016). Fifty years of A‐level mathematics: Have standards changed? British Educational Research Journal, 42(4), 543–560.  https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kennedy, J. P., Lyons, T., & Quinn, F. (2014). The continuing decline of science and mathematics enrolments in Australian high schools. Teaching Science, 60(2), 34–46.Google Scholar
  31. Kim, C., Park, S. W., & Cozart, J. (2014). Affective and motivational factors of learning in online mathematics courses. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(1), 171–185.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01382.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. King, D., & Cattlin, J. (2015). The impact of assumed knowledge entry standards on undergraduate mathematics teaching in Australia. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 46(7), 1032–1045.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2015.1070440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kizilcec, R. F., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., & Maldonado, J. J. (2017). Self-regulated learning strategies predict learner behavior and goal attainment in Massive Open Online Courses. Computers & Education, 104(2017), 18–33.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.10.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Koenig, J. (2011). A survey of the mathematics landscape within bioscience undergraduate and postgraduate UK higher education (p. 22). Leeds: UK Centre for Bioscience. https://doi.org/10.11467/344.
  35. Kusurkar, R. A., Ten Cate, T. J., Vos, C. M. P., Westers, P., & Croiset, G. (2013). How motivation affects academic performance: A structural equation modelling analysis. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 18(1), 57–69.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-012-9354-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Leong, K. E., & Alexander, N. (2014). College students’ attitude and mathematics achievement using web-based homework. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10(6), 601–615.  https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1220a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Loughlin, W. A., Johnston, P. R., Watters, D. J., Brown, C. L., & Harman, D. (2015). Snapshot of mathematics skills of first year science students from diverse backgrounds. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 23(1), 21–36.Google Scholar
  38. Matthews, K. E., Belward, S., Coady, C., Rylands, L., Simbag, V., Adam, P., & Tariq, V. (2012). The state of quantitative skills in undergraduate science education: Findings from an Australian study. Office for Learning and Teaching: Canberra. Retrieved May 13, 2016, from http://researchonline.jcu.edu.au/26400/1/QS_report_July2012.pdf.
  39. Mac an Bhaird, C., Fitzmaurice, O., Fhloinn, E. N., & O’Sullivan, C. (2013). Student non-engagement with mathematics learning supports. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications, 32(4), 191–205.Google Scholar
  40. MacGillivray, H., & Wilson, T. (2008). Quantitative diversity: Disciplinary and cross-disciplinary mathematics and statistics support in Australian universities. Australian Learning and Teaching Council. Retrieved July 25, 2018, from http://www.olt.gov.au/resource-library?text=mathematics.
  41. McPhan, G., Morony, W., Pegg, J., Cooksey, R., & Lynch, T. (2008). Maths? Why not? Final report prepared for the Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations. Canberra (Australia). Retrieved July 25, 2018, from https://www.aamt.edu.au/content/download/33194/469618/file/MaWhNot_Published.pdf.
  42. Nakakoji, Y., Wilson, R., & Poladian, L. (2014). Mixed methods research on the nexus between mathematics and science. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 22(6), 61–76.Google Scholar
  43. Ní Fhloinn, E., Fitzmaurice, O., Mac an Bhaird, C., O’Sullivan, C. (2014). Student perception of the impact of mathematics support in higher education. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 45(7), 953–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Noyes, A., & Sealey, P. (2012). Investigating participation in advanced level mathematics: A study of student drop-out. Research Papers in Education, 27(1), 123–138.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02671520903288885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Overton, T., & Johnson, L. (2016). Evidence-based practice in learning and teaching for STEM disciplines. Retrieved April 20, 2018 from, http://www.acds-tlcc.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/sites/14/2016/07/ACDS-stem-principles-WEB.pdf.
  46. Park, T., Woods, C. S., Hu, S., Bertrand Jones, T., & Tandberg, D. (2018). What happens to underprepared first-time-in-college students when developmental education is optional? The case of developmental math and intermediate algebra in the first semester. The Journal of Higher Education, 89(3), 318–340.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2017.1390970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Parsons, S., Croft, T., & Harrison, M. (2009). Does students’ confidence in their ability in mathematics matter? Teaching Mathematics and its Applications, 28(2), 53–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pohjolainen, S., Nykänen, O., Venho, J., & Kangas, J. (2018). Analysing and improving students’ mathematics skills using ICT-tools. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education14(4), 1221–1227.  https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/81869.
  49. Quinnell, R., Thompson, R., & LeBard, R. J. (2013). It’s not maths; It’s science: Exploring thinking dispositions, learning thresholds and mindfulness in science learning. International Journal of Mathematics Education in Science and Technology, 44(6), 808–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ramirez-Arellano, A., Bory-Reyes, J., Hernández-Simón, L. M. (2018). Emotions, motivation, cognitive–Metacognitive strategies, and behavior as predictors of learning performance in blended learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, January, 1–23.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117753935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rylands, L. J., & Coady, C. (2009). Performance of students with weak mathematics in first-year mathematics and science. International Journal of Mathematics Education in Science and Technology, 40(6), 741–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rylands, L. J., Simbag, V., Matthews, K. E., Coady, C., & Belward, S. (2013). Scientists and mathematicians collaborating to build quantitative skills in undergraduate science. International Journal of Mathematics Education in Science and Technology, 44(6), 834–945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schneider, M., & Preckel, F. (2017). Variables associated with achievement in higher education: A systematic review of meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 143(6), 565–600.  https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook for research on mathematics teaching and learning (Chap. 15). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  55. Sen, S., Yilmaz, A., & Yurdagül, H. (2014). An evaluation of the pattern between students’ motivation, learning strategies and their epistemological beliefs: The mediator role of motivation. Science Education International, 25(3), 312–331.Google Scholar
  56. Tariq, V. N. (2008). Defining the problem: Mathematical errors and misconceptions exhibited by first-year bioscience undergraduates. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 39(7), 889–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tariq, V. N., Qualter, P., Roberts, S., Appleby, Y., & Barnes, L. (2013). Mathematical literacy in undergraduates: Role of gender, emotional intelligence and emotional self-efficacy. International Journal of Mathematics Education in Science and Technology, 44(8), 1143–1159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tempelaar, D. T., Niculescu, A., Rienties, B., Gijselaers, W. H., & Giesbers, B. (2012). How achievement emotions impact students’ decisions for online learning, and what precedes those emotions. Internet and Higher Education, 15(3), 161–169.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.10.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wilson, R., & Mack, J. (2014). Declines in high school mathematics and science participation: Evidence of students’ and future teachers’ disengagement with maths. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 22(7), 35–48.Google Scholar
  60. Wienk, M. (2015). Discipline Profile of the Mathematical Sciences 2015, Australian Mathematical Sciences Institute. Retrieved May 13, 2016, from http://amsi.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/discipline-profile-2015.pdf.
  61. Wilkes, J., & Burton, L. J. (2015). Get set for success: Applications for engineering and applied science students. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 23(1), 94–105.Google Scholar
  62. Zusho, A., Pintrich, P. R., & Coppola, B. (2003). Skill and will: The role of motivation and cognition in the learning of college chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1081–1094.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000052207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wendy A. Loughlin
    • 1
    Email author
  • Peter R. Johnston
    • 2
  • Christopher L. Brown
    • 1
  • Dianne J. Watters
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Environment and Science, Griffith UniversityBrisbaneAustralia
  2. 2.School of Environment and Science, Griffith UniversityNathanAustralia

Personalised recommendations