Implementing PebblePad into Forensic Chemistry—A Whole of Program Approach
Forensic chemistry at Griffith is undertaken as part of a 3- or 4-year program and students study both mainstream chemistry courses and specialised forensic science courses. We have introduced reflective learning tasks, using PebblePad, into two first-year courses and again into a final-year capstone course with a view to encouraging students to engage more actively in learning reflection. The ultimate aim is for students to accrue a range of assets/resources that can be used to generate a portfolio to showcase their skills and which could be ultimately used to address job selection criteria. This chapter will discuss the preliminary results of this implementation and will identify where and how reflective learning tasks can be best used in particular courses within the forensic chemistry program to achieve these outcomes.
KeywordsPebblePad Portfolios Undergraduate program Reflective writing
- Allan, C. N., & Green, D. M. (2018). Griffith Sciences Blended Learning Model. Griffith University ExLNT Explore Learning and Teaching. Retrieved November 22, 2018, from https://app.secure.griffith.edu.au/exlnt/entry/6405/view.
- Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (1985). What is reflection in learning? In D. Boud, R. Keogh, & D. Walker (Eds.), Reflection: Turning experience into learning. London: Kogan Page Ltd.Google Scholar
- Fraser, J., & Williams, R. (2009). Handbook of forensic science. Collumpton, UK: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
- Grayling, A. (2003). Meditations for the humanist: Ethics for a secular age. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Horton, R., Kelly, T., Lennard, C., Lewis, S., Lim, K., Roux, C., & Southam, D. (2012). Assessing students’ attitudes toward forensic science: Collecting an expert consensus. Forensic Sciene Policy and Management: An International Journal, 3(4), 180–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/19409044.2013.849780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kirkup, L. (2013). Inquiry-oriented learning in science: Transforming practice through forging new partnerships and persectives. Retrieved November 22, 2018, from https://ltr.edu.au/resources/Kirkup_NTF_report_2013_2.pdf.
- O’Connor, C., Seery, M., McDonnell, C., O’Donnell, C., Fox, J., Cullen, J., & Cresswell, S. (2008). Development of context-based forensic chemistry labs for chemistry undergraduates. Wavelength, 4(1), 10–11.Google Scholar
- Overton, T. (2001). Teaching chemists to think: From parrots to professionals. University Chemistry Education, 5, 62–68.Google Scholar
- Roberts, P., Maor, D., & Herrington, J. (2016). ePortfolio-based learning environments: Recommendations for effective scaffolding of reflective thinking in higher education. Educational Technology and Society, 19(4), 22–33.Google Scholar
- Sommerfield, S., Overton, T., & Belt, S. (2003). Problem-solving case studies. Analytical Chemistry, 75(7), 181A–182A.Google Scholar
- Vachon, B., Foucault, M., Giguere, C., Rochette, A., & Morel, M. (2018). Factors influencing acceptability and perceived impacts of a mandatory eportfolio implemented by an occupational therapy regulation organization. The Journal of Continuing Education in Health Professionals, 38(1), 25–31. https://doi.org/10.1097/CEH.0000000000000182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar