How Technologies Change Classrooms - A Case Study of K-12 Education in Sudan

  • Adam TairabEmail author
  • Ronghuai Huang
  • TingWen Chang
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Educational Technology book series (LNET)


This study examines technology integration into the classroom in K-12 education in Sudan. The study used official documents (reports and plans) and observation as data sources. The results revealed existence of efforts to integrate technology in terms of e-classrooms, providing some schools with an interactive whiteboard. However, there are challenges hinder the integration of technology such as poor infrastructure, lack of digital skills among teachers’. The study then recommended continuous such effort and involving stakeholders and donors in issues of technology for schools.


Technology change classroom Educational Context Information and Communication Technology K-12 Education Sudan 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1] Ahmed, A. (2015). A preliminary study of ICT’s infrastructure and pedagogical practices for technology integration in Sudanese Secondary schools. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 12(7), 37–54.Google Scholar
  2. [2] Alamin, H. A. A., & Elgabar, E. E. A. (2014). Success Factors for Adopting E-learning Application in Sudan. International Journal of Soft Computing and Engineering (IJSCE), 3(4), 128–131.Google Scholar
  3. [3] Bray, M., & Lillis, K. (Eds.). (2016). Community Financing of Education: Issues & Policy Implications in Less Developed Countries (Vol. 5). Elsevier.Google Scholar
  4. [4] Baek, Y., Jung, J., & Kim, B. (2008). What makes teachers use technology in the classroom? Exploring the factors affecting facilitation of technology with a Korean sample. Computers & Education, 50(1), 224–234.Google Scholar
  5. [5] Baker, P. L(2018). An Analysis of cooperate Income Tax Policy Of Less Developed Countries. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 120(2), 400–427.Google Scholar
  6. [6] Bowen, G. A. (2013). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.Google Scholar
  7. [7] Cheah, H. M., & Lim, K. Y. T. (2016). Mediating approaches to the use of ICT in teaching and learning through the lenses of ‘craft’ and ‘industrial’ educator. Journal of Computers in Education, 3(1), 21–31.
  8. [8] Elemam, Abdelwahed Elsafi. (2016). Barriers to Implementation of Information and Communication (ICT) in Public Sudanese Secondary Schools: Teacher’s Prospective. Journal of Sociological Research, 7(1), 33–43.
  9. [9] Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration?. Educational technology research and development, 53(4), 25.Google Scholar
  10. [10] Fraser, B. (2015). Classroom learning environments. InEncyclopedia of Science Education (pp. 154–157). Springer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  11. [11] Garavaglia, A., Garzia, V., & Petti, L. (2013). The integration of computers into the classroom as school equipment: a primary school case study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 83(3), 323–327.Google Scholar
  12. [12] Greenwald, S., Kulik, A., Kunert, A., Beck, S., Frohlich, B., Cobb, S., … & Snyder, A. (2017). Technology and applications for collaborative learning in virtual reality. CSCL 2017 Proceedings.Google Scholar
  13. [13] Kafyulilo, A., Fisser, P., & Voogt, J. (2016). Factors affecting teachers’ continuation of technology use in teaching. Education and Information Technologies, 21(6), 1535–1554.Google Scholar
  14. [14] Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers college record, 108(6), 1017.–39.Google Scholar
  15. [15] Pierson, M. E. (2001). Technology integration practice as a function of pedagogical expertise. Journal of research on computing in education, 33(4), 413–430.Google Scholar
  16. [16] Rodríguez, P., Nussbaum, M., &Dombrovskaia, L. (2012). ICT for education: a conceptual framework for the sustainable adoption of technology-enhanced learning environments in schools. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 21(3), 291–315.Google Scholar
  17. [17] Wong, E. M. L.,& Li, S. C. (2011). Framing ICT implementation in a context of educational change - a structural equation modelling analysis. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(2), 361–379.Google Scholar
  18. [18] Andreasen, K. J., Medina, E., & Newell, M. (2018). An Investigation of Professional Development to Prepare Secondary Administrators to Be Instructional Leaders in Technology Integration. ProQuest LLC.Google Scholar
  19. [19] Burbules, N. (2018). Watch IT: The risks and promises of information technologies for education. Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. [20] Collins, A., & Halverson, R. (2018). Rethinking education in the age of technology: The digital revolution and schooling in America. Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  21. [21] Good, T. L., & Lavigne, A. L. (2017). Looking in classrooms. Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. [22] Stubbé, H. E., van der Klauw, M., Langefeld, J. J., Theunissen, N. C. M., van der Hulst, A. H., & Holland, S. W. C. (2016). E-learning Sudan Final report Phase II.Google Scholar
  23. [23] Tikhomirov, V., Dneprovskaya, N., &Yankovskaya, E. (2015). Three dimensions of smart education. In Smart Education and Smart e-Learning (pp. 47–56). Springer, Cham.Google Scholar
  24. [24] Federal Ministry of General Education (2016). Teacher Training Department.Google Scholar
  25. [25] JAMES CHEN.(2018). Less-Developed Country (LDC). Available online;

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of educational technology – Beijing Normal UniversityHaidian District, BeijingChina
  2. 2.Smart learning Institute of Beijing Normal UniversityHaidian District, BeijingChina

Personalised recommendations