Advertisement

Emarking: A collaborative platform to support feedback in higher education assessment

  • Jorge VillalonEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Educational Technology book series (LNET)

Abstract

This article reports on six years of experience on the continuous redesign and implementation of a collaborative marking platform to support summative and formative feedback in higher education. The design follows principles of feedback quality, collaboration between teachers and students, and institutional requirements for administrative features. The platform includes modules for printing management, scanning support, on-screen-marking, markers training and peer reviews by students. The goal of the platform is to reduce the cost of providing quality feedback by the reuse of annotations and comments, the use of rubrics, and the collaboration between markers, which can monitor inter-rater agreement through real marking processes.

Keywords

Electronic feedback collaborative marking emarking 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by FONDECYT 11130055 grant from CONICYT, Chile.

References

  1. [1] B. Paltridge, “Academic writing,” Language Teaching, vol. 37, pp. 87–105, 2004.Google Scholar
  2. [2] E. E. Hansson, P. J. Svensson, E. L. Strandberg, M. Troein and A. Beckman, “Inter-rater Reliability and Agreement of Rubrics for Assessment of Scientific Writing,” Education, vol. 4, pp. 12–17, 2014.Google Scholar
  3. [3] V. J. Shute, “Focus on Formative Feedback,” Review of Educational Research, vol. 78, pp. 153–189, 2008.Google Scholar
  4. [4] E. Heinrich, J. Milne and B. Granshaw, “Pathways for improving support for the electronic management and marking of assignments,” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 28, pp. 279–294, 2012.Google Scholar
  5. [5] J. Villalon, “An eMarking tool for paper based evaluations,” in Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, 2012.Google Scholar
  6. [6] A. Meier, H. Spada and N. Rummel, “A rating scheme for assessing the quality of computersupported collaboration processes,” International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, vol. 2, pp. 63–86, Mar 2007.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Transformación DigitalUniversidad Adolfo IbáñezSantiagoChile

Personalised recommendations