Advertisement

Correlational Analysis of IRS Features and Learning Performance in Synchronous Sessions of an Online Course

  • Benazir QuadirEmail author
  • Nian-Shing Chen
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Educational Technology book series (LNET)

Abstract

This paper investigated the relationships between students’ perceptions toward the features (i.e., feedback, engagement, usability, and satisfaction) of two instant response systems (IRS) and their learning performance in the synchronous sessions of an online course. A survey was conducted for assessing how IRS features are related to learning performance. Two different IRS tools, “Kahoot” and “mQlicker,” were used to conduct meaningful interactive learning activities in the synchronous sessions of an online course. Collected data were analyzed using Pearson Correlation analysis, and it was found that students’ feedback, usability and satisfaction are significantly correlated to learning performance. On the other hand, engagement did not show any significant correlation to learning performance. Discussion and implications of adopting IRS tools are also presented.

Keywords

Instant response system (IRS) Feedback Engagement Usability Learning satisfaction Learning performance 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1] Doe, C. (2010). A look at student response systems. Multimedia & Internet @ Schools, 17(4), 32–35. 3.Google Scholar
  2. [2] Sim R. (1997) Interactivity: a forgotten art? Computers in Human Behavior, 13(2),157–180.Google Scholar
  3. [3] Chien, Y.T., Chang, Y.H. and Chang, C.Y.(2016). Do we click in the right way? A metaanalytic review of clicker-integrated instruction. Educational Research Review, 17, 1–18.Google Scholar
  4. [4] Oigara, J & Keengwe, J. (2013). Students’ perceptions of clickers as an instructional tool to promote active learning. Education & Information Technology, 18(1),15–28.Google Scholar
  5. [5] Deng, L., & Yuen, A. H. (2009). Blogs in higher education: Implementation and issues. TechTrends, 53(3), 95.Google Scholar
  6. [6] Dong, J.J., Hwang, W.Y., Shadiev, R. and Chen, G.Y.(2017). Pausing the classroom lecture: The use of clickers to facilitate student engagement. Active Learning in Higher Education, 18(2),157–172.Google Scholar
  7. [7] Dawson, D.L., Meadows, K.N. and Haffie, T. (2010). The Effect of Performance Feedback on Student Help-Seeking and Learning Strategy Use: Do Clickers Make a Difference? Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 1(1), p.6.Google Scholar
  8. [8] Hunsu, N.J., Adesope, O. and Bayly, D.J. (2016). A meta-analysis of the effects of audience response systems (clicker-based technologies) on cognition and affect. Computers & Education, 94, 102–119.Google Scholar
  9. [9] Benazir Quadir, Nian-Shing Chen, and Jun Zhang. (2018). Learner Satisfaction toward using IRS in Synchronous Sessions of an Online Course. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Frontiers of Educational Technologies (ICFET ‘18). ACM, Moscow, Russia, 10–15.Google Scholar
  10. [10] Shackel, B. and Richardson, S.J. eds. (1991). Human factors for informatics usability. Cambridge university press.Google Scholar
  11. [11] Oliver, R.L. (2014). Satisfaction: A behavioral perspective on the consumer. Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. [12] Addison, S., Wright, A., & Milner, R. (2009). Using clickers to improve student engagement and performance in an introductory biochemistry class. Biochemistry and Molecular biology Education, 37(2), 84–91.Google Scholar
  13. [13] Shapiro, A. M., & Gordon, L. T. (2012). A controlled study of clicker-assisted memory enhancement in college classrooms. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(4), 635–643.Google Scholar
  14. [14] Quaye, S. J., & Harper, S. (2015). Student engagement in higher education: Theoretical perspectives and practical approaches for diverse populations (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Information Management, School of BusinessShandong University of TechnologyZiboChina
  2. 2.Department of Applied Foreign LanguagesNational Yunlin University of Science and TechnologyDouliuTaiwan

Personalised recommendations