Forest as a Sink of Carbon in Global and Nepalese Context

  • Anup K. C.


Forest plays a great role to absorb carbon dioxide (CO2) present in the air and store in its floral parts and the soil. The amount it sinks varies according to the time, type of vegetation, geographical area, and the management strategy applied on it. It is an important method of reducing current global climate change problem and increasing ecosystem balance. This chapter is prepared with the help of review of researches on carbon stock (CS) and carbon (C) sequestration in the global and Nepalese context. Different methodological issues and findings on CS are documented in this chapter. There are different studies conducted throughout the globe about assessment of CS and C sequestration rate. These studies have used different methodologies for assessing C stored in tree, shrub, dry leaf, herbs, grass, and soil. Most of the researchers have used allometric equations for analyzing C in aboveground biomass, laboratory analysis for soil organic carbon (SOC), and root to shoot ratio for C in belowground biomass. There was variation of CS in its tree; sapling; leaf litter, herbs, and grass (LHG); and soil. Also, it varies across different species and location. But, the amount of C stored by forest was increasing with the passage of time. The average CS around the world is 73 tons per hectare having the highest in South America with 122 tons per hectare and the lowest in Europe with 45 tons per hectare. The average CS in tree component of Nepal is 108.88 tons per hectare, litter and debris is 1.18 tons per hectare, and soil is 66.88 tons per hectare. Management strategy has greater influence on C storage and sequestration. Monetary incentives such as Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD) schemes and payment for ecological services to the managers would help to absorb more CO2 from the atmosphere and reduce the rate of greenhouse gas emission.


Carbon sink Forest Global and Nepalese context Methodologies 



Asia Network for Sustainable Agriculture and Bioresources




Community forest


Carbon dioxide


Carbon pool


Carbon stock


Diameter at breast height


Global positioning system


International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development


Leaf litter, herbs, and grass




Square meter


Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation


Tons per hectare


  1. Abere F, Belete Y, Kefalew A, Soromessa T (2017) Carbon stock of Banja forest in Banja district, Amhara region, Ethiopia: an implication for climate change mitigation. J Sustain For 36(6):604–622. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aggarwal A, Chauhan S (2014) Carbon sequestration and economic potential of the selected medicinal tree species: evidence from Sikkim, India. J Sustain For 33(1):59–72. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aryal C (2010) Status of carbon stock at Toudol Chhap Community Forest, Sipadol, Bhaktapur. Master thesis, Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur, Kathmandu, NepalGoogle Scholar
  4. Aryal S, Bhattarai DR, Devkota RP (2013) Comparison of carbon stocks between mixed and pine-dominated forest stands within the Gwalinidaha Community Forest in Lalitpur District, Nepal. Small Scale For 12:659–666. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Banskota K, Karky BS, Skutch M (2007) reducing carbon emissions through community-managed forests in the Himalayas. International Centre For Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD), KathmanduGoogle Scholar
  6. Bayat AT, Gils HV, Weir M (2012) Carbon stock of European Beech forest; a case at M. Pizzalto, Italy. APCBEE Procedia 1:159–168. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bhatta P (2004) Carbon stock capacity of mixed broad leaved forests of Phulchowki Watershed, Lalitpur. Master thesis, Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur, Kathmandu, NepalGoogle Scholar
  8. Bhusal RP (2010) Carbon stock estimation of Nagmati Watershed in Shivapuri National Park. Master thesis, Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur, Kathmandu, NepalGoogle Scholar
  9. Buragohain S, Sharma B, Nath JD, Gogaoi N, Meena RS, Lal R (2017) Impact of ten years of bio-fertilizer use on soil quality and rice yield on an inceptisol in Assam, India. Soil Res. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chaudhary RP, Uprety Y, Rimal S (2015) Deforestation in Nepal: causes, consequences and responses. In: Shroder JF, Sivanpillai R (eds) Biological and environmental hazards and disasters, vol 1, pp 335–372Google Scholar
  11. Chave J, Andalo C, Brown C (2005) Tree allometry and improved estimation of carbon stocks and balance in tropical forests. Oecologia 145:87–99. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen X (2006) Carbon storage traits of main tree species in natural forests in Northeast China. J Sustain For 23(1):67–84. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dahal P (2007) Carbon sequestration status at Sunaulo Ghampa Danda Community forest, Kathmandu. Master thesis, Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur, Kathmandu, NepalGoogle Scholar
  14. DFRS (2015) State of Nepal’s forests Forest resource assessment of Nepal, vol 5. Department of Forest Research and Survey, Ministry of forests and soil conservation, KathmanduGoogle Scholar
  15. Dhakal K (2010) Carbon stock estimation of Pashupati Community Forest. Master thesis, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, NepalGoogle Scholar
  16. Dhakal Y, Meena RS, De N, Verma SK, Singh A (2015) Growth, yield and nutrient content of mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) in response to INM in eastern Uttar Pradesh, India. Bangladesh J Bot 44(3):479–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. DoF (2018) CFUG database record available in MIS. Community Forestry Division, Department of Forest, KathmanduGoogle Scholar
  18. FAO (2016) Global forest resources assessment 2015, 2nd edn. Food and Agricultural Organization of United Nations, RomeGoogle Scholar
  19. Fukuda M, Iehara T, Matsumoto M (2003) Carbon stock estimates for sugi and hinoki forests in Japan. For Ecol Manage 184:1–16. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gil MV, Marıa DB, Carballo T, Calvo LF (2011) Carbon stock estimates for forests in the Castilla y Leon region, Spain. A GIS based method for evaluating spatial distribution of residual biomass for bio-energy. Biomass Bioenery 35:243–252. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Houghton RA, Nassikas AA (2018) Negative emissions from stopping deforestation and forest degradation, globally. Glob Change Biol 24:350–359. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. ICIMOD ANSAB FECOFUN (2010) Forest carbon stock in community forests in three watersheds (Ludikhola, Kayarkhola and Charnawati) (Measurement period: March–June 2010). Kathmandu, Nepal: International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development, Asia Network for Sustainable Agriculture and Bioresources, Federation of Community Forest Users’ NepalGoogle Scholar
  23. IPCC (2006) Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories, Volume 4: Agricultural, forestry and other land use. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  24. Jhariya MK (2014) Effect of forest fire on microbial biomass, storage and sequestration of carbon in a tropical deciduous forest of Chhattisgarh. Ph.D. Thesis. I.G.K.V., Raipur (C.G.), p 259Google Scholar
  25. Jhariya MK (2017) Vegetation ecology and carbon sequestration potential of shrubs in tropics of Chhattisgarh, India. Environ Monit Assess 189(10):518. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jhariya MK, Raj A (2014) Human welfare from biodiversity. Agrobios Newsl XIII(9):89–91Google Scholar
  27. Jhariya MK, Yadav DK (2018) Biomass and carbon storage pattern in natural and plantation forest ecosystem of Chhattisgarh, India. J For Environ Sci 34(1):1–11. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. K C A (2016) Community forest management: A success story of green economy in Nepal. J Environ Sci 2:148–154Google Scholar
  29. K C A (2017) Community forestry management and its role in biodiversity conservation in Nepal. In: Stephen LGA (ed) Wildlife research, vol 1. InTech, Kathmandu, pp 51–72Google Scholar
  30. K C A, Bhandari G, Joshi GR, Aryal S (2013a) Climate change mitigation potential from carbon sequestration of community forest in mid hill region of Nepal. Int J Environ Protect 3(7):33–40Google Scholar
  31. K C A, Bhandari G, Wagle SP, Banjade Y (2013b) Status of soil fertility in a community forest of Nepal. Int J Environ 1(1):56–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. K C A, Joshi GR, Aryal S (2014) Opportunity cost, willingness to pay and cost benefit analysis of a community forest of Nepal. Int J Environ 3(2):108–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. K C A, Koirala I, Adhikari N (2015) Cost benefit analysis of a community forest in Nepal. J Sustain For 34(3):199–213. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. K C A, Manandhar R, Paudel R, Ghimire S (2018) Increase of forest carbon biomass due to community forestry management in Nepal. J For Res 29(2):429–438. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kalies EL, Haubensak KA, Finkral AJ (2016) A metaanalysis of management effects on forest carbon storage. J Sustain For 35(5):311–323. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Karky BS (2008) The economics of reducing emissions from community managed forests in Nepal Himalaya. Degree of Doctorate, University of Twente, Enschede, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  37. Khanal A (2007) Estimating the potential of community forestry: a case from Champadevi Forest. Kirtipur, Kathmandu, Nepal. Master thesis submitted to Central Department of Environmental Science, Tribhuvan UniversityGoogle Scholar
  38. Khanal Y, Sharma RP, Upadhyaya CP (2010) Soil and vegetation carbon pools in two community forests of Palpa district, Nepal. Banko Janakari 20(2):34–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kumar S, Meena RS, Yadav GS, Pandey A (2017) Response of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) to sulphur and lime application under soil acidity. Int J Plant Soil Sci 14(4):1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. MacDicken K (1997) A guide to monitoring carbon storage in forestry and agroforestry projects. Forest Carbon Monitoring Programme, Winrock International Institute for Agricultural Development, ArlingtonGoogle Scholar
  41. Meena H, Meena RS, Lal R, Singh GS, Mitran T, Layek J, Patil SB, Kumar S, Verma T (2018a) Response of sowing dates and bio regulators on yield of clusterbean under current climate in alley cropping system in eastern U.P. Indian Legum Res 41(4):563–571Google Scholar
  42. Meena RS, Kumar V, Yadav GS, Mitran T (2018b) Response and interaction of Bradyrhizobium japonicum and Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in the soybean rhizosphere: a review. Plant Growth Regul 84:207–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. MoFSC (2011) Forest carbon measurement guidelines. Climate Change and REDD Cell, KathmanduGoogle Scholar
  44. Pandey SS, Maraseni TN, Cockfield G (2014a) Carbon stock dynamics in different vegetation dominated community forests under REDD+: a case from Nepal. For Ecol Manage 327:40–47. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pandey SS, Maraseni TN, Cockfield G, Gerhard K (2014b) Tree species diversity in community managed and National park forests in the Mid-Hills of Central Nepal. J Sustain For 33(8):796–813. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pearson TR, Brown SL, Birdsey RA (2007) Measurement guidelines for the sequestration of forest carbon. US: Northern Research Station, Department of AgricultureGoogle Scholar
  47. Raj A, Jhariya MK, Harne SS (2018a) Threats to biodiversity and conservation strategies. In: Sood KK, Mahajan V (eds) Forests, climate change and biodiversity. Kalyani Publisher, New Delhi, pp 304–320. 381ppGoogle Scholar
  48. Raj A, Jhariya MK, Bargali SS (2018b) Climate smart agriculture and carbon sequestration. In: Pandey CB, Gaur MK, Goyal RK (eds) Climate change and agroforestry: adaptation mitigation and livelihood security. New India Publishing Agency (NIPA), New Delhi, pp 1–19. ISBN: 9789-386546067Google Scholar
  49. Ramachandran A, Jayakumar S, Haroon RM, Bhaskaran A, Arockiasamy DI (2007) Carbon sequestration: estimation of carbon stock in natural forests using geospatial technology in the Eastern Ghats of Tamil Nadu, India. Curr Sci 92(3):323–331Google Scholar
  50. Sharma C, Gairola S, Baduni N, Ghildiyal S, Suyal S (2011) Variation in carbon stocks on different slope aspects in seven major forest types of temperate region of Garhwal Himalaya, India. J Biosci 36(4):701–708CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Shrestha BM, Singh BR (2008) Soil and vegetation carbon pools in a mountainous watershed of Nepal. Nutr Cycle Agroecosyst 81(2):179–191. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Shrestha S, Karky BS, Gurung A, Bista R, Vetaas OR (2013) Assessment of carbon balance in community forests in Dolakha, Nepal. Small-scale For 12(4):507–517. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sihag SK, Singh MK, Meena RS, Naga S, Bahadur SR, Gaurav, Yadav RS (2015) Influences of spacing on growth and yield potential of dry direct seeded rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars. Ecoscan 9(1–2):517–519Google Scholar
  54. Subedi BP, Pandey SS, Pandey A, Rana EB, Bhattarai S, Banskota TR, Tamrakar R (2010) Forest carbon stock measurement: guidelines for measuring carbon stocks in community managed forests. Kathmandu, Nepal: ANSAB, FECOFUN and ICIMOD in Support from NORADGoogle Scholar
  55. Sukhdev P, Stone S, Nuttall N (2010) Green economy, developing countries success stories: United Nation Environment Programme (UNEP)Google Scholar
  56. Thapa-Magar KB, Shrestha BB (2015) Carbon stock in community Managed Hill Sal (Shorea robusta) forests of Central Nepal. J Sust For 34(5):483–501. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ullah MR, Al-Amin M (2012) Above- and below-ground carbon stock estimation in a natural forest of Bangladesh. J For Sci 58(8):372–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Upadhyay TP, Sankhayan PL, Solberg B (2005) A review of carbon sequestration dynamics in the Himalayan region as a function of land-use change and forest/soil degradation with special reference to Nepal. Agric Ecosyst Environ 105:449–465. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Verma JP, Jaiswal DK, Meena VS, Meena RS (2015) Current need of organic farming for enhancing sustainable agriculture. J Clean Prod 102:545–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Walkley A, Black IA (1934) An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining organic carbon in soils: effect of variations in digestion conditions and of inorganic soil constituents. Soil Sci 63:251–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Yadav GS, Lal R, Meena RS, Babu S, Das A, Bhomik SN, Datta M, Layak J, Saha P (2017) Conservation tillage and nutrient management effects on productivity and soil carbon sequestration under double cropping of rice in North Eastern Region of India. Ecol India.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anup K. C.
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Environmental Science, Amrit CampusTribhuvan UniversityKathmanduNepal
  2. 2.Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism ManagementClemson UniversityClemsonUSA

Personalised recommendations