Advertisement

The Cultural Nature of the Zone of Proximal Development: Young People with Severe Disabilities and Their Development of Independence

  • Louise BøttcherEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Perspectives in Cultural-Historical Research book series (PCHR, volume 6)

Abstract

In many of her writings, Mariane Hedegaard insists on the centrality of motives in understanding development. Taking the concept of motives to heart, this chapter explores the development of independence in young people with severe disabilities. Vygotsky understood disability as an incongruence between the individual’s psychological structure and the structure of cultural forms. The incongruence describes a dialectical relation between the person with a disability and the surrounding society. Thus, a disability is never stable, but changes over time as a function of both individual development and the shape of the supportive activities and assistive technologies in the person’s activity settings. A study of eight young people with congenital motor impairment and severe difficulties in developing verbal speech is presented. The young people and their parents were interviewed about the life history of the child and the family and the young person’s current situation. The analysis unravels how cultural-historically grounded practices for support impacts on the child’s social situation of development, including development of independence. The point of the chapter will be to discuss the benefit of understanding independence as a developmental and relational phenomenon. Focusing on motives and developmental crises in the social situation of development highlights the development of independence as related to societal opportunities and institutional motives.

Keywords

Disability Defectology Independence Cerebral palsy Augmentative and Alternative Communication 

References

  1. Almack, K., Clegg, J., & Murphy, E. (2009). Parental negotiation of the moral terrain of risk in relation to young people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 19, 286–298.  https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brennan, C., Traustadottir, R., Rice, J., & Anderberg, P. (2016). Negotiating independence, choice and autonomy: Experiences of parents who coordinate personal assistance on behalf of their adult son or daughter. Disability & Society, 31(5), 604–621.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2016.1188768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hedegaard, M. (2002). Learning and child development. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Hedegaard, M. (2009). Children’s development from a cultural-historical approach: Children’s activity in everyday local settings as foundation for their development. Mind, Culture and Activity, 16, 64–81.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10749030802477374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Oliver, M. (1989). Disability and dependency: A creation of industrial societies. In L. Barton (Ed.), Disability and dependency. London: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  6. Porter, G. (2007) PODD Kommunikationsbøger [Translated from Pragmatic Dynamic Organised Display. Communication books]. Handikram: Gistrup.Google Scholar
  7. Reindal, S. M. (1999). Independence, dependence, interdependence: Some reflections on the subject and personal autonomy. Disability & Society, 14(3), 353–367.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09867599926190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Tamaru, A., McColl, M. & Yamasaki, S. (2007). Understanding independence: Perspective of ocupational therapists. Disability and Rehabilitation, 29(13), 1021–1033.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280600929110.
  9. Vygotsky, L. S. (1993). The fundamentals of defectology. In R. W. Rieber & A. S. Carton (Eds.), The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky: Volume 2. New York, NY: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  10. Vygotsky, L. S. (1998). Child Psychology. In R. W. Rieber & A.S. Carton (eds.), The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky: Volume 5. New York, NY: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  11. Warschausky, S., Kaufman, J., Schutt, W., Evitts, M., & Hurvitz, E. (2017). Health self-management, transition readiness and adaptive behaviour in persons with cerebral palsy or myelomeningocele. Rehabilitation Psychology, 62(3), 268–275.  https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EducationAarhus UniversityAarhusDenmark

Personalised recommendations