Reading and Writing as a Cultural Praxis of Youth

  • Bernd FichtnerEmail author
Part of the Perspectives in Cultural-Historical Research book series (PCHR, volume 6)


This chapter draws on a comparative study of the reading and writing activities of young people in Brazil and Germany. Identifying both reading and writing as potential ways of young people creating a sense of themselves, rather than merely activities that are associated with the normative expectations of schools; data discussed here shows how these activities operate as resources for personal becoming. By using Spinoza’s categories of freemen (sic), tyrant, slave, and priest to interrogate the accounts of themselves and their reading and writing given by the young people in both cultural environments, the chapter demonstrates a novel way of looking across cultures to tease out differences as well as similarities. The analysis raises questions about how these differences might be traced back to societal processes. These categories therefore both allow a nuanced reading of the young people’s accounts and raise some fundamental questions for comparative studies about (i) how particular cultures function a media to produce free men, tyrants, slaves, and priests?—and (ii) what mechanisms enable this? The chapter concludes with a short reflection on how Hedegaard’s work on institutional practices motive orientation within institutional settings may help address aspects of these questions.


Spinoza Práxis Motives Culture 


  1. Assmann, A. (1999). Lesen als Beleben: Zum Verhältnis von Medium und Imagination, Vortrag.
  2. Benjamin, W. (1969). Programm eines proletarischen Kindertheaters 1928. In: Ders. Über Kinder, Jugend und Erziehung, (pp. 79–86). Frankfurt7 M: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  3. Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology. A once and future discipline. Cambridge: Havard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Hedegaard, M. (2012). The dynamics aspects in children’s learning and development. In M. Hedegaard, A. Edwards, & M. Fleer (Eds.), Motives in children’s development: Cultural-historical approaches (pp. 9–27). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Hedegaard, M., & Edwards, A. (2014). Transitions and children’s learning. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 3(3), 185–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hedegaard, M., & Fleer, M. (2013). Play, leaning and children’s development: Everyday life in families and transition to school. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lurija, A. R. (1983). Verso un analisi della personalità concreta. La “scienza romantica”: ritratti non imaginari. In: A. R. Lurija: uno sguardo sul passato. Considerazioni retrospettive sulla vita di uno psicologo sovietico. Presentazione di M.S. Vegetti. Firenze: Giunti Barbèra.Google Scholar
  8. Vygotsky, L. S. (1934). Denken und Sprechen (1964). Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of SiegenSiegenGermany

Personalised recommendations