Advertisement

Studying Children’s Friendship Activities Ethically Using the Interaction-Based Observation Method

  • Hanne Værum SørensenEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Perspectives in Cultural-Historical Research book series (PCHR, volume 6)

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to acknowledge the influence that the interaction-based observation method developed by Mariane Hedegaard has had on my studies of young children’s friendship activities. Hedegaard has problematized how the existing methods of evaluating children’s development were inadequate. These methods were based on the assumption of testing children as if a test situation can be a neutral and context-free activity. Hedegaard developed an alternative approach, the interaction-based observation method. The approach brings to the fore ethical considerations while it focuses on identifying children’s motives and competences. By taking the child’s perspective, it places the researcher as interpreter of children’s apparently intentional actions and the motives they convey, giving considerable power to the researcher. In this, Chap.  1 considers the method and its ethical implications for early childhood research and how Hedegaard’s methods address these concerns. The method also offered a new and important perspective on analyzing pedagogical practices and the conditions in institutions when considering children’s learning and development. Since the 1980s, the interaction-based observation method has been fundamental to the education of pedagogues in early childhood pedagogy in Denmark. These same ethical concerns and ways of overcoming them are therefore also relevant to early education practice.

Keywords

Interaction-based observation Ethics in child research Friendships in kindergarten Physical activity Children’s play 

References

  1. Albon, D., & Rosen, R. (2013). Negotiating adult-child relationships in early childhood research. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Burman, E. (2008). Deconstructing developmental psychology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Dagtilbudsloven (2016). Børne–og Familieministeriet.Google Scholar
  4. Hedegaard, M. (1983). LEGE-LÆRE. En analyse af førskolebørns tilegnelse af færdigheder ved leg med pædagogiske materialer. København: Forlaget Børn & Unge.Google Scholar
  5. Hedegaard, M. (1990). Beskrivelse af småbørn. Aarhus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag.Google Scholar
  6. Hedegaard, M. (2008a). Developing a dialectic approach to researching children’s development. In M. Hedegaard & M. Fleer (Eds.), Studying children. A cultural-historical approach (pp. 30–45). New York. McGraw-Hill: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Hedegaard, M. (2008b). Principles for interpreting research protocols. In M. Hedegaard & M. Fleer (Eds.), Studying children. A cultural-historical approach (pp. 46–64). New York. McGraw-Hill: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Hedegaard, M. (2008c). The role of the researcher. In M. Hedegaard & M. Fleer (Eds.), Studying children. A cultural-historical approach (pp. 202–207). New York. McGraw-Hill: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Hedegaard, M. (2009). Children’s development from a cultural-historical approach: Children’s activity in everyday local settings as foundation for their development. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 16, 64–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hedegaard, M. (2012). Analyzing children’s learning and development in everyday settings from a cultural-historical wholeness perspective. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 19(2), 127–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hedegaard, M. (2016). Imagination and emotion in children’s play: A cultural-historical approach. International Research in Early Childhood Education, 7(2), 57–72.Google Scholar
  12. Leontiev, A. N. (2005). Study of the environment in pedological works of L.S. Vygotsky. A critical study. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 43(4), 8–28.Google Scholar
  13. Løgstrup, K. E. (1956). Den etiske fordring (The ethical challenge). Denmark.Google Scholar
  14. McDermott, R. P. (1993). The acquisition of a child by a learning disability. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice. Perspectives on activities and context. UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Schutz, A. (2005). Hverdagslivets sociologi. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag.Google Scholar
  16. Stenild, M. Hedegaard. (1977). Begrebsindlæring—en procesanalyse. København: Dansk Psykologisk Forlag.Google Scholar
  17. Stenild, M. Hedegaard. (1978). Spædbarnet og førskolebarnet: Aspekter af den intellektuelle udvikling. København: Dansk Psykologisk Forlag.Google Scholar
  18. Stenild, M. Hedegaard. (1979). Træning af 7 og 9 års børns rumsrepræsentation og spatiale problemløsning. Psykologisk Skriftserie: Aarhus, Psykologisk Institut, Aarhus Universitet.Google Scholar
  19. Sørensen, H. V. (1996). Kvalitet i daginstitutioner. Kandidatspeciale: Aarhus University.Google Scholar
  20. Sørensen, H. V. (2001a). Venskaber mellem små børn i daginstitutioner. Aarhus: SL’s og BUPL’s Udviklings- og ForskningsFond.Google Scholar
  21. Sørensen, H. V. (2001b). Friendships among small children in kindergarten. The Oriental Anthropologist, 1(2), 40–45.Google Scholar
  22. Sørensen, H. V. (2013). Børns fysiske aktivitet i børnehaver. Ph.D. thesis, University of Southern Denmark.Google Scholar
  23. Sørensen, H. V. (2014). Ethics in researching young children’s play in preschool. In M. Fleer & A. Ridgway (Eds.), Visual methodologies and digital tools for researching with young children (pp. 193–212). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Vassing, C. (2011). Developing the practice of educational psychology consultation in schools to become supportive to the development of children in difficulties. Ph.D. thesis, University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  25. Vygotsky, L. S. (1966). Play and its role in the mental development of the child. Voprosi psikhologii, 12(6), 62–76.Google Scholar
  26. Vygotsky, L. S. (1998). Child Psychology. The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky (Vol. 5). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Western Norway University of Applied SciencesBergenNorway

Personalised recommendations