Advertisement

Cultural-Historical Activity Theory Meets Developmental Systems Perspective: Transformative Activist Stance and Natureculture

  • Anna StetsenkoEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Perspectives in Cultural-Historical Research book series (PCHR, volume 6)

Abstract

Recent developments in the interdisciplinary field of research on human development, amounting to no less than a conceptual revolution, strongly suggest that the so-called interactionist consensus on nature–culture debates falls far short of accounting for the true complexity of developmental dynamics. There is a strong affinity on this point between the recently influential developmental systems perspective (DSP) and Vygotsky’s works including in its activity theory lineage. In these frameworks, individual and environmental characteristics are understood to continuously emerge in the life course, while codefining and cogenerating each other in the very process of developmental transactions. Both frameworks shift beyond the concept of development as a mechanically additive, hybrid product in which external and internal (genetic and environmental) influences are mechanically summated and combined as extraneous and separate units to be added to each other. Furthermore, while sharing the emphasis on joint determination by multiple causes, contextual sensitivity and contingency, Vygotsky’s framework expanded through Transformative Activist Stance is more radical and resolute in offering conceptual tools to understand development as an activity-dependent, emergent co-construction of developmental outcomes by human beings coacting with others in agentively coauthoring their communal world while relying on available cultural resources. This discussion creates a context in which the relevance of works by Mariane Hedegaard can be highlighted.

Keywords

Agency Developmental Activist Biological 

References

  1. Bakhtin, M. M. (1993). Toward a philosophy of the act. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bidell, T. R., & Fischer, K. W. (1996). Between nature and nurture: The role of human agency in the epigenesis of intelligence. In R. Sternberg & E. Grigorenko (Eds.), Intelligence: Heredity and environment (pp. 193–242). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Charney, E. (2008). Genes and ideologies. Perspectives on Politics, 6, 299–319.Google Scholar
  4. Darling-Hammond, L. (2007). The flat earth and education: How America’s commitment to equity will determine our future. Educational Researcher, 36, 318–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dar-Nimrod, I., & Heine, S. J. (2011). Genetic essentialism: On the deceptive determinism of DNA. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 800–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Engels, F. (1939). Anti-Dühring. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
  7. Fischer, K. A. (1980). Theory of cognitive development: The control and construction of hierarchies of skills. Psychological Review, 87, 477–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gould, S. J. (1996). The mismeasure of man (2nd ed.). New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  9. Gutiérrez, C. D., & Rogoff, B. (2003). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits and repertoire of practice. Educational Researcher, 32, 19–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Haslam, N. (2011). Genetic essentialism, neuroessentialism, and stigma. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 819–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hedegaard, M. (2009). Children’s development from a cultural-historical approach: Children’s activity in everyday local settings as foundation for their development. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 16(1), 64–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hedegaard, M. (2012). Analyzing children’s learning and development in everyday settings from a cultural-historical wholeness approach. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 19(2), 127–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hedegaard, M., & Fleer, M. (2008). Studying children. A cultural–historical approach. England: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Hedegaard, M., & Fleer, M. (2013). Play, learning, and children’s development: Everyday life in families and transition to school. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hruby, G. G. (2012). Three requirements for justifying an educational neuroscience. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ingold, T. (2011). Being alive: Essays on movement, knowledge and description. Abingdon, England: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Karimi-Aghdam, S. (2017). Rethinking Vygotskian cultural-historical theory in light of Pepperian root metaphor theory: Dynamic interplay of organicism and contextualism. Human Development, 59(5), 251–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Keller, F.E. (2010). Gilbert Gottlieb and the developmental point of view. In K.E. Hood, C. Tucker Halpern, G. Greenberg, & R.M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of developmental science, behavior, and genetics (pp. xi–xiv). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  19. Ladson-Billings, G. (2006). From the achievement gap to the education debt: Understanding achievement in U.S. schools. Educational Researcher, 35(7), 3–12.Google Scholar
  20. Leontiev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  21. Lerner, R. M. (2006). Developmental science, developmental systems, and contemporary theories of human development. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 1–17)., Theoretical models of human development Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  22. Lickliter, R., & Honeycutt, H. (2003a). Developmental dynamics: Towards a biologically plausible evolutionary psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 819–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lickliter, R., & Honeycutt, H. (2003b). Evolutionary approaches to cognitive development: Status and strategy. Journal of Cognition and Development, 4, 459–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lickliter, R., & Honeycutt, H. (2015). Biology, development, and human systems. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science (pp. 162–207). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  25. Marx, K. (1844/1978). Economic and philosophical manuscripts. In R.C. Tucker (Ed.), Marx/Engels reader (2nd ed., pp. 66–125). New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  26. Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1845-46/1978). The German ideology. In R.C. Tucker (Ed.), Marx/Engels reader (2nd ed., pp. 146–200). New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  27. Ollman, B. (1979). Social and sexual revolution: Essays on Marx and Reich. Boston: South End.Google Scholar
  28. Overton, W. F. (2006). Developmental psychology: Philosophy, concepts, methodology. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Theoretical models of human development: Vol. 1, Handbook of child psychology (6th ed., pp. 18–88). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  29. Oyama, S. (2000). Evolution’s eye. Durham, NC: Duke University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Robert, J. S. (2004). Embryology, epigenesis, and evolution: Taking development seriously. New York: Cambridge University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stetsenko, A. (2005). Activity as object- related: Resolving the dichotomy of individual and collective types of activity. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 12(1), 70–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Stetsenko, A. (2007). Being- through- doing: Bakhtin and Vygotsky in dialogue. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 2, 25–37.Google Scholar
  33. Stetsenko, A. (2008). From relational ontology to transformative activist stance on development and learning: Expanding Vygotsky’s (CHAT) project. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3, 471–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stetsenko, A. (2009). Vygotsky and the conceptual revolution in developmental sciences: Towards a unified (non-additive) account of human development. In M. Fleer, M. Hedegaard, J. Tudge, & A. Prout (Eds.), World yearbook of education. Constructing childhood: Global–local policies and practices (pp. 125–142). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Stetsenko, A. (2010). Teaching-learning and development as activist projects of historical Becoming: Expanding Vygotsky’s approach to pedagogy. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 5(1), 6–16.Google Scholar
  36. Stetsenko, A. (2011). Darwin and Vygotsky on development: An exegesis on human nature. In M. Kontopodis, C. Wulf, & B. Fichtner (Eds.), Children, development and education (pp. 25–41). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stetsenko, A. (2014). Transformative activist stance for education: Inventing the future in moving beyond the status quo. In T. Corcoran (Ed.), Psychology in Education: Critical Theory~Practice (pp. 181–198). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stetsenko, A. (2015). Theory for and as social practice of realizing the future: Implications from a transformative activist stance. In J. Martin, J. Sugarman, & K. Slaney (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of theoretical and philosophical psychology: Methods, approaches, and new directions for social sciences (pp. 102–116). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  39. Stetsenko, A. (2016a). Moving beyond the relational worldview: Exploring the next steps premised on agency and a commitment to social change. Human Development, 59, 283–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stetsenko, A. (2016b). The transformative mind: Expanding Vygotsky’s approach to human development and education. New York: Cambridge University.Google Scholar
  41. Stetsenko, A. (2017). Putting the radical notion of equality in the service of disrupting inequality in education: Research findings and conceptual advances. Review of Research in Education, 41, 112–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stetsenko, A., & Arievitch, I. M. (2010). Cultural-historical activity theory: Foundational worldview and major principles. In J. Martin & S. Kirschner (Eds.), The sociocultural turn in psychology: The contextual emergence of mind and self (pp. 231–253). New York: Columbia University.Google Scholar
  43. Stetsenko, A., & Ho, P.-C. G. (2015). The serious joy and the joyful work of play: Children becoming agentive actors in co-authoring themselves and their world through play. International Journal of Early Childhood, 47(2), 221–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Thelen, E. (2005). Dynamic systems theory and the complexity of change. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 15, 255–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.Google Scholar
  46. Varma, S., McCandliss, B., & Schwartz, D. (2008). Scientific and pragmatic challenges for bridging education and neuroscience. Educational Researcher, 37, 140–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Vianna, E., & Stetsenko, A. (2011). Connecting learning and identity development through a transformative activist stance: Application in adolescent development in a child welfare program. Human Development, 54, 313–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vygotsky, L.S. (1993). The collected works. (Vol. 2). The fundamentals of defectology. In R. W. Rieber, & A. S. Carton (Eds.). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  49. Vygotsky, L. S. (1997). The collected works. (Vol. 4). The history of the development of higher mental functions. In R. W. Rieber, (Ed.). New York, NY: Plenum.Google Scholar
  50. Wahlsten, D. (2003). Airbrushing heritability. Genes, Brain, & Behavior, 2, 327–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Witherington, D. C. (2007). The dynamic systems approach as metatheory for developmental psychology. Human Development, 50, 127–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Graduate Center of The City University of New YorkNew York CityUSA

Personalised recommendations