Am I Doing It Right? Normative Performativity in the Emergence of Learning as a Leading Activity

  • Paula Cavada-HrepichEmail author
Part of the Perspectives in Cultural-Historical Research book series (PCHR, volume 6)


Learning to read and write is one of the core goals to be achieved within the first years of school, an agenda that has increasingly been pushed down into preschools. However, preschools and schools have different understandings of children’s development and learning, and consequently different educational practices, pedagogical activities and even material conditions. Drawing on Mariane Hedegaard’s elaboration of a wholeness approach to children’s learning and development, this chapter presents a study from Chile of the development of a motive orientation of Samuel during his transition from pre-school to first-year primary. The analysis reveals that while learning was progressively established as a leading activity for Samuel, in this process Samuel and his classmates encountered a series of institutional demands related to grade based academic achievement and control that hindered their possibilities for engaging in literacy learning activities. Under the restricted literacy learning activity setting, children’s engagement was primarily aimed at fulfilling the requirement of the pupil’s position, which has more to do with performing following a set of strict rules and orders, than with developing a motive orientation to learning, such as, exploring and understanding a new system of knowledge communication.


Learning Children’s perspective Performativity Leading activity Educational transition 


  1. Bröstrom, S. (1992). A Cross-cultural, ethnographical and comparative study of one Danish and one American kindergarten plus the psychological development of these Danish and American 6 year old children. Copenhagen: Royal Danish School of Educational Studies. Retrieved from
  2. Cassidy, M. (2005). ‘They do it anyway’: A study of primary 1 Teachers’ perceptions of children’s transition into primary education. Early Years, 25(2), 143–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cavada-Hrepich, P. (in press). From play to learning: Playfulness as a resource in children’s transition. In M. Hedegaard & M. Fleer (Eds.), Children’s transition in everyday life and across institutions. Bloomsbury PublisherGoogle Scholar
  4. Davidov, V. V. (1999). What is real learning activity? In M. Hedegaard & J. Lompscher (Eds.), Learning activity and development (pp. 123–138). Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Ebbeck, M., Saidon, S. B., nee Rajalachime, G. & Teo, L. Y. (2013). Children’s voices: Providing continuity in transition experiences in Singapore. Early Childhood Education Journal41(4), 291–298.Google Scholar
  6. Einarsdóttir, J. (2010). Children’s experiences of the first year of primary school. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 18(2), 163–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Elkonin, D. B. (1972). Toward the problem of stages in the mental development of the child. Soviet Psychology, 10(3), 225–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fisher, R. (2012). Teaching writing: A situated dynamic. British Educational Research Journal, 38(2), 299–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(10), 1489–1522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Heckman, J., Pinto, R., & Savelyev, P. (2013). Understanding the mechanisms through which an influential early childhood program boosted adult outcomes. The American Economic Review, 103(6), 2052–2086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hedegaard, M. (2001). Learning through acting within societal traditions: Learning in classrooms. In M. Hedegaard (Ed.), Learning in classrooms: A cultural-historical approach. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hedegaard, M. (2008). A dialectical approach to researching children’s development. In M. Hedegaard & M. Fleer (Eds.), Studying children: A cultural-historical approach (pp. 30–45). Berkshire: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hedegaard, M. (2012). Analyzing children’s learning and development in everyday settings from a cultural-historical wholeness approach. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 19(2), 127–138.
  14. Hedegaard, M. (2014). The significance of demands and motives across practices in children’s learning and development: An analysis of learning in home and school. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 3(3), 188–194. Scholar
  15. Hedegaard, M., & Fleer, M. (2013). Play, learning and children’s development. Everyday life in families and transition to school. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Howe, S. (2016). What play means to us: Exploring children’s perspectives on play in an English Year 1 classroom. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 24(5), 748–759.Google Scholar
  17. Hviid, P., & Zittoun, T. (2008). Editorial introduction: Transitions in the process of education. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 23(2), 121–130.Google Scholar
  18. Karpov, Y. V. (2005). The Neo-Vygotskian approach to child development. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Leontiev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  20. Leontiev, A. N. (1981). Problems of the development of the mind. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
  21. Leontiev, A. N. (2009). The development of mind: Selected works of Aleksei Nikolaevich Leontyev. Ohio: Bookmasters, Inc. Retrieved August 13, 2013, from
  22. Ministry of Education of Chile. (2005). Bases curriculares de la Educación Parvularia. Retrieved from
  23. Mirkhil, M. (2010). ‘I Want to Play When I Go to School’: Children’s views on the transition to school from Kindergarten. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 35(3), 134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Peisner-Feinberg, E., Burchinal, M., Clifford, R., Culkin, M., Howes, C., Kagan, S., et al. (2001). The relation of preschool child-care quality to children’s cognitive and social developmental trajectories through second grade. Child Development, 5(72), 1534–1553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Stetsenko, A. (2009). Vygotsky and the conceptual revolution in developmental sciences: Towards a unified (non-additive) account of human development. In M. Fleer, M. Hedegaard, J. Tudge & A. Prout (Eds.), World year book of education. Constructing childhood: Global–local policies and practices (pp. 125–142). Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Snow, C., Burns, S., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  27. Sylva, K., & Wiltshire, J. (1994). The impact of early learning on children’s later development: A review prepared for the RSA inquiry ‘Start Right’. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 1(1), 17–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. van Oers, B. (Ed.). (2012). Developmental education for young children: Concept, practice and implementation. Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
  29. Veresov, N. (2006). Leading activity in developmental psychology: Concept and principle. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 44(5), 7–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Vygotsky, L. S. (1966). Play and its role in the mental development of the child. Voprosy Psikhologii, 12, 62–76.Google Scholar
  31. Vygotsky, L. S. (1997). The problem of the development of higher mental functions. In: R. W. Rieber (Ed.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Vol. 4. The history of the development of higher mental functions (pp. 1–251). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Communication and Psychology atAalborg UniversityAalborgDenmark

Personalised recommendations