Advertisement

Viability of Pseudomonas plecoglossicida and Rhizobium sp. LM-5 as Liquid Bacterial Fertilizers in Various Formulated Carriers

  • Puwanto
  • Febrina Angelina Samosir
  • Yuyun Yuwariah
  • Sumadi
  • Tualar Simarmata
Chapter

Abstract

Microbial fertilizers, known as “biofertilizers,” have the ability to convert the nonusable to usable form into nutritionally important elements through biological processes. The effectiveness and viability of biofertilizer inoculants are correlated with carrier formulations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of various carrier materials for the shelf life of N-fixing P. plecoglossicida strain NBFPALD_RAS144 and Rhizobium sp. LM-5 to produce as liquid formulations. The experiments to investigate the effect of carrier formulation were conducted under laboratory conditions from January to July during 2015. The experiment was set up as a completely randomized design, consisting of nine different formulations each in three replications. The population of P. plecoglossicida strain NBFPALD_RAS144 and Rhizobium sp. LM-5 were enumerated at 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 weeks of incubation at room temperature. The population of P. plecoglossicida strain NBFPALD_RAS144 after 24 weeks of incubation varied in different carrier formulations. Maximum cell density (12.8 × 109 CFU mL−1) was recorded in 5% molasses + 0.05% polyvinyl alcohol, while the lowest population (2.65 × 109 CFU mL−1) was recorded in 2.5% Triton. The population of Rhizobium sp. LM-5 remained relatively high even after 6 months of incubation in all the formulation of carriers under tested.

Keywords

Carrier formulation P. plecoglossicida strain NBFPALD_RAS144 Rhizobium sp. LM-5 Liquid biofertilizer Cell density 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to The Director of CV. Bintang Asri Arthauly Bandung, West Java Indonesia, for laboratory facilities to carry out this research. Rina Rismawati S and Mr. Agus Sopandi for assistance in the preparation of tools and materials, research, and data retrieval.

References

  1. Brar SK, Sarma SJ, Chaabouni E (2012) Shelf-life of biofertilizers: an accord between formulations and genetics. J Biofertil Biopest 5(3):1–2Google Scholar
  2. Chowdhury A, Mukherjee P (2006) Biofertilizers. News Lett ENVIS Cent Environ Biotechnol 9:2–7Google Scholar
  3. Deaker R, Roughley RJ, Kennedy IR (2007) Desiccation tolerance of rhizobia when protected by synthetic polymers. Soil Biol Biochem 39:573–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Herrmann L, Lesueur D (2013) Challenges of formulation and quality of biofertilizers for successful inoculation. Appl Microb Biotechnol 97:8859–8873.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-013-5228-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hubalek Z (2003) Protectant used in the cryopreservation of microorganisms. Cryobiology 46:205–229.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-2240(03)00046-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kumaresan G, Reetha D (2011) Survival of Azospirillum brasilense in liquid formulation amended with different chemical additives. J Phytology 3(10):48–51Google Scholar
  7. Peighami-Ashnaei S, Sharifi-Tehrani A, Ahmadzadeh M, Behboudi K (2009) Interaction of different media on production and biocontrol efficacy of Pseudomonas fluorescens P-35 and Bacillus subtilis B-3 against grey mould of apple. J Plant Pathol 91(1):65–70Google Scholar
  8. Pindi PK, Satyanarayana SDV (2012) Liquid microbial consortium –a potential tool for sustainable soil health. J Biofertil Biopest 3(4):1–9Google Scholar
  9. Purwanto, Yuwariah Y, Sumadi, Simarmata T (2016) Nitrogenase activity and IAA production of indigenous diazotroph and its effect on rice seedling growth. AGRIVITA J Agric Sci 39(1):31–37.  https://doi.org/10.17503/agrivita.v39i1.653 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Razie F, Iswandi A (2005) Potential of Azotobacter spp. (from tidal land area of South Kalimantan) in producing IAA (Potensi Azotobacter spp. (dari daerah lahan pasang surut Kalimatan Selatan) dalam menghasilkan IAA). J Tanah dan Lingkungan 7(1):35–39Google Scholar
  11. Reddy MS, Ryu CM, Zhang S, Yan Z, Kloepper JW (2000) Aqueous formulations of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for control of foliar pathogens. Auburn University. online http://www.ag.auburn.edu/argentina/pdfmanuscripts/reddy.pdf. Accessed 12/04/00
  12. Rivera D, Obando M, Barbosa H, Tapias DR, Buitrago RB (2014) Evaluation of polymer for the liquid rhizobial formulation and their influence in the Rhizobium – cowpea interaction. Univ Sci 19(3):265–275.  https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.SCI19-3.eplr CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ruíz-Valdiviezo VM, Canseco LMCV, Suárez LAC, Gutiérrez-Miceli FA, Dendooven L, Rincón-Rosales R (2015) Symbiotic potential and survival of native rhizobia kept on different carriers. Brazilian J Microbiol 46(3):735–742.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-838246320140541 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Sharma RA, Totawat KL Maloo SR Somani LL (2004) Biofertilizer technology. Agrotech Publishing Academy, Udaipur. ISBN:81-85680-90-6Google Scholar
  15. Shrestha R, Maskey SL (2005) Associative nitrogen fixation in lowland rice. Nepal Agric Res 6:112–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Simarmata T (2013) Tropical bioresources to support biofertilizer industry and sustainable agriculture in Indonesia. In: Invited and presented paper for international seminar on tropical bio-resources for sustainable bioindustry 2013; from Basic Research to Industry, 30–31st October 2013 in West and East Hall – ITB-Bandung-Indonesia. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Tualar_Simarmata/publications/?linkType=fulltextFileandev=prf_pubs_file
  17. Simarmata T, Turmuktini H, Fitriatin T, Setiawati BN, Purwanto MR (2016) Application of bioameliorant and biofertilizers to increase the soil health and rice productivity. HAYATI J Biosci 23(4):181–184.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hjb.2017.01.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Singh T, Purohit SS (2011) Biofertilizers technology. Agrobios (India)Google Scholar
  19. Singh JS, Pandey VC, Singh DP (2011) Efficient soil microorganisms: a new dimension for sustainable agriculture and environmental development. Agric Ecosyst Environ 140:339–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sudjana B, Jingga A, Simarmata T (2017) Enriched rice husk biochar ameliorant to increase crop productivity on typic hapludults. Glob Adv Res J Agric Sci 6(5):108–113Google Scholar
  21. Vakadattu G, Peterson J (2006) Free-living bacteria lift soil nitrogen supply. Farm Ahead 169:40Google Scholar
  22. Widowati LR, Nursyamsi D, Rochayati S, Sarwani ML (2011) Nitrogen management on agricultural land in Indonesia. In: Proceedings of the international seminar on increased agricultural nitrogen circulation in Asia: technological challenge to mitigate agricultural N emissions, Taipei, Taiwan, September 27–28Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Puwanto
    • 1
  • Febrina Angelina Samosir
    • 2
  • Yuyun Yuwariah
    • 3
  • Sumadi
    • 3
  • Tualar Simarmata
    • 4
  1. 1.Agrotechnology Department, Faculty of AgricultureJenderal Soedirman UniversityPurwokertoIndonesia
  2. 2.Department of Soil Sciences and Land Resources Management, Agriculture FacultyPadjadjaran UniversityBandungIndonesia
  3. 3.Department of Crop Production, Agriculture FacultyPadjadjaran UniversityBandungIndonesia
  4. 4.Department of Soil Science, Faculty of AgricultureUniversitas PadjadjaranSumedangIndonesia

Personalised recommendations