Advertisement

Citizenship and State Formation in Postcolonial Indonesia

  • Gerry van KlinkenEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

The riddle of Murder in Maumere is solved. Violence is attributable not simply to the military acting alone, or to societal factionalism by itself, but to a particular model of state governance. The 1945 revolution had been premised on the republican idea that citizens represent their interests directly and democratically to the central state through a political party. By the mid-1960s, however, many elites within the Republic of Indonesia, at the centre and in the provinces, had abandoned that idea. They favour disconnecting citizens from the central state and reattaching them to trusted local elites, who are free to act despotically. The genocidal violence of 1965–1966 was an anti-republican counter-revolution. It returned Indonesian citizenship to a form of indirect rule. Today’s decentralisation adheres to the same logic, fed by a deep distrust of the central state. But dissatisfaction is growing with the corrupt patronage politics it entails. Is there a future for democratic republicanism in the global south?

Keywords

Citizenship Postcolonial Violence Decentralised despotism Central state Republicanism Democracy Indonesia Global south 

References

  1. Aeschylus (transl Robert Fagles). 1966. The Oresteia, Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, Benedict R. O’G. 1972. Java in a time of revolution: occupation and resistance 1944–1946. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Aspinall, Ed, and Ward Berenschot. 2018. Democracy for sale: elections, clientelism and the state in Indonesia. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Auyero, Javier. 2001. Poor people’s politics: peronist survival networks and the legacy of Evita. Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Balibar, Étienne. 2015. Citizenship. Polity.Google Scholar
  6. Barnes, R.H. 2003. “Fransiskus/Usman Buang Duran: Catholic, Muslim, communist.” Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde 159 (1):1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berenschot, Ward, and Peter Mulder. forthcoming. “Public service delivery, clientelism and state-dependency: exploring regional variation in governance in Indonesia.”Google Scholar
  8. Carothers, Thomas. 2007. “The ‘sequencing’ fallacy.” Journal of Democracy 18 (1):12–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chatterjee, Partha. 2004. The politics of the governed: reflections on popular politics in most of the world. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Cribb, Robert. 2009 [1991]. Gangsters and revolutionaries: the Jakarta People’s Militia and the Indonesian revolution 1945–1949. Jakarta: Equinox Publishing.Google Scholar
  11. Eickhoff, Martijn, Gerry van Klinken, and Geoffrey Robinson. 2017. “Introduction – 1965 Today. Living with the Indonesian Massacres.” Journal of Genocide Research 19 (4):449–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gerlach, Christian. 2010. Extremely violent societies: mass violence in the twentieth-century world. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Giddens, Anthony. 1991. Modernity and self-identity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  14. Goodhart, David. 2017. The road to somewhere: the populist revolt and the future of politics. London: Hurst.Google Scholar
  15. Helmke, Gretchen, and Steven Levitsky. 2004. “Informal institutions and comparative politics: a research agenda.” Perspectives on Politics 2 (4):725–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hiariej, Eric, and Kristian Stokke, eds. 2017. Politics of citizenship in Indonesia. Jakarta: Obor.Google Scholar
  17. Huntington, Samuel P. 1996. The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. New York: Touchstone, Rockefeller Center.Google Scholar
  18. Kalyvas, Stathis N. 2003. “The ontology of political violence: action and identity in civil wars.” Perspectives on Politics 1 (3):475–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kammen, Douglas, and Katharine McGregor, eds. 2012. The contours of mass violence in Indonesia, 1965–1968. Singapore: NUS Press for the Asian Studies Association of Australia.Google Scholar
  20. Klinken, Gerry van. 2004. “Dayak ethnogenesis and conservative politics in Indonesia’s outer islands.” In Indonesia in transition: rethinking ‘civil society’, ‘region’ and ‘crisis’, edited by Henk Schulte Nordholt and Hanneman Samuel, 107–128. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.Google Scholar
  21. Klinken, Gerry van. 2007. Communal violence and democratization in Indonesia: small town wars, Routledge Contemporary Southeast Asia Series; 15. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Klinken, Gerry van. 2014. The making of Middle Indonesia: middle classes in Kupang town, 1930s–1980s, Power and place in Southeast Asia. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  23. Lange, Matthew K. 2004. “British colonial legacies and political development.” World Development 32 (6):905–922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lazar, Sian, and Monique Nuijten. 2013. “Citizenship, the self and political agency.” Critique of Anthropology 33 (1):3–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lucas, Anton E. 1991. One soul one struggle: Region and revolution in Indonesia. Sydney: Asian Studies Association of Australia in association with Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  26. Mamdani, Mahmood. 1996. Citizen and subject: contemporary Africa and the legacy of late colonialism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Manor, James. 2013. “Post-clientelist initiatives.” In Democratization in the global South: the importance of transformative politics, edited by Kristian Stokke and Olle Törnquist, 243–253. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  28. Migdal, Joel S. 2001. State in society: studying how states and societies transform and constitute one another, Cambridge studies in comparative politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. North, Douglass C., John Joseph Wallis, and Barry R. Weingast. 2009. Violence and social orders: a conceptual framework for interpreting recorded human history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Nyers, Peter. 2007. “Introduction: why citizenship studies.” Citizenship Studies 11 (1):1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rancière, Jacques. 2001. “Ten theses on politics.” Theory & Event 5 (3).  https://doi.org/10.1353/tae.2001.0028.
  32. Reid, Anthony. 1979. The blood of the people: revolution and the end of traditional rule in northern Sumatra. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Reid, Anthony. 1998. “Merdeka: the concept of freedom in Indonesia.” In Asian Freedoms: The idea of freedom in East and Southeast Asia, edited by David Kelly and Anthony Reid, 141–160. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Robins, Steven, Andrea Cornwall, and Bettina von Lieres. 2008. “Rethinking ‘citizenship’ in the postcolony.” Third World Quarterly 29 (6):1069–1086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shiraishi, Saya S. 1997. Young heroes: the Indonesian family in politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Southeast Asia Program Publications.Google Scholar
  36. Sidel, John T. 2014. “Economic foundations of subnational authoritarianism: insights and evidence from qualitative and quantitative research.” Democratization 21 (1):161–184.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2012.725725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Smail, John R. W. 1968. “The military politics of Northern Sumatra: December 1956–October 1957.” Indonesia 6 (October):128–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sulistyo, Hermawan. 2000. Palu arit di ladang tebu: sejarah pembantaian yang terlupakan 1965–1966. Jakarta: Kepustakaan Gramedia Populer.Google Scholar
  39. Tilly, Charles. 2005. Trust and rule. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Warner, Mildred. 2006. Restructuring local government. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, Department of City and Regional Planning.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.University of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations