Advertisement

Performance-Based Seismic Evaluation of Multi-storey R.C.C. Building with Addition of Shear Wall

  • SumitEmail author
  • S. M. Gupta
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 30)

Abstract

It has been evident from the recent history of earthquake that the improper and inadequate design of structures may cause great damage. Many existing structures are seismically deficient as the engineers and designers are not well aware of the seismic behaviour of a structure. Hence, there is a need to determine the seismic response of such buildings for designing earthquake structures by conducting a seismic analysis of structures. Performance-based seismic design is an elastic design methodology which was carried out by considering the probable performance of a building under different ground motions. In this context, pushover analysis which is an iterative procedure should be looked upon as an alternative for the orthodox analysis procedures. The principal objective of this paper is to evaluate the performance of (G+10) and (G+20) storey RCC building with and without shear wall. Nonlinear static pushover analysis was performed by using SAP 2000, which is a product of computers and structures international. On the basis of the result, it was found that both buildings satisfy the drift criteria as recommended in IS 1893:2002 (part-1).

Keywords

Performance-based seismic design Pushover analysis Base shear SAP 2000 

References

  1. Akshara SP (2015) Performance based seismic evaluation of multi-storeyed reinforced concrete building using pushover analysis. IRJET 2(3). ISSN 2395-0056Google Scholar
  2. ASCE (2000) Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. FEMA 356 report, prepared by the American Society of Civil Engineers for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C. ATC, 1997a, NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings, FEMA 273 report, prepared by the Applied Technology Council for the Building Seismic Safety Council, published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.CGoogle Scholar
  3. Chaudhari DJ, Dhoot Gopal O (2016) Performance based design of reinforced concrete building. OJCE 6, 188-194Google Scholar
  4. Choudhary N, Wadia M (2014) Pushover analysis of R.C. frame building with shear wall. IOSR J Mech Civil Eng (IOSR-JMCE) 11(2):9–13. e-ISSN 2278-1684, p-ISSN 2320-334X. Ver. V (Mar–Apr 2014)Google Scholar
  5. IS 1893 (Part 1):2002 Criteria for earthquake resisting design of structures—Indian Standard Code of Practice, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  6. IS 456:2000 Plain and reinforced concrete—Indian Standard Code of Practice, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  7. Kevadkar MD, Kodag PB (2013) (IJMER) Int J Modern Eng Res 3(3):1428–1434Google Scholar
  8. Khedkar AS et al (2014) Performance based seismic design of reinforced concrete moment resistant frame with vertical setback. IJERT 3(2). ISSN 2278-0181Google Scholar
  9. Lakshmi KO et al (2014) ISOI J Eng Comput Sci 1(1):7–17Google Scholar
  10. Monish S, Karuna S (2015) A study on seismic performance of high rise irregular RC framed buildings. IJRET Int J Res Eng Technol. eISSN 2319-1163/pISSN 2321-7308Google Scholar
  11. Nikam NM, Kalurkar LG (2016) Pushover analysis of building with shear wall. Int J Eng Sci Comput 6(8):2916–2918Google Scholar
  12. Pambhar JD (2012) Performance based pushover analysis of R.C.C. frames. Int J Adv Eng Res Stud IJAERS 1/(3):329–333. e-ISSN 2249-8974Google Scholar
  13. Parishith J, Preetha V (2017) Pushover analysis of RC frame buildings with shear wall a review. IJSRD Int J Sci Res Dev 4(12) (2017). ISSN (online) 2321-0613Google Scholar
  14. Pednekar SC et al (2015) Pushover analysis of reinforced concrete structures. Int J Comput Appl 0975–8887. In: International conference on quality up gradation in engineering, science and technology (ICQUEST2015)Google Scholar
  15. Poluraju P, Nageswara Rao P (2011) Pushover analysis of reinforced concrete frame structure using SAP 2000. Int J Earth Sci Eng 4(6):684–690. ISSN 0974-5904Google Scholar
  16. Prakash V (2004) Whither performance-based engineering in India. ISET J. Earthq Technol 41(1):201–222. Paper no 447Google Scholar
  17. Pratap Y, Neelima PVS (2015) Performance based design: case study. IJEMR 5. ISSN (Online) 2250-0758, ISSN (Print) 2394-6962Google Scholar
  18. Priestely MJN (2000) Performance based seismic design. In: 12th world conference on earthquake engineering, paper no. 2831, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  19. Satish Kumar SR, Venkateswarlu G (2008) Performance based design of reinforced concrete plane frames. In: 14th world conference on earthquake engineering, Beijing, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  20. Satish Kumar SR, Venkateswarlu G (2008) Performance based seismic design of reinforced concrete plane frames. In: The 14th world conference on earth quake engineering, Beijing, China, 12–17 Oct 2008Google Scholar
  21. Singh RR, Poluraju P (2017) Performance based seismic design of RC framed building. Int J Civ Eng Technol (IJCIET). ISSN (Print) 0976-6308, ISSN (Online) 0976-6316Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringNIT KurukshetraKurukshetraIndia

Personalised recommendations