Advertisement

Study on the Influence of Attached Mortar Content on the Properties of Recycled Concrete Aggregate

  • Kanish Kapoor
  • Amad Ur Rehman BohrooEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 30)

Abstract

The evergrowing construction industry is one of the largest consumers of natural resources. The increasing demand for the infrastructure, leads to the usage of raw materials like aggregates, is at its peak. Due to which the natural nonrenewable resources, which are being used for producing these materials, are starting to get extinct as these resources have been continuously and tremendously used. Depletion of these natural resources is a matter which needs sincere attention. To counteract this problem, one of the possible solutions is to use recycled aggregates as the substitute for the natural aggregates. The only barrier in using recycled aggregate is that the strength of recycled concrete aggregates is less than that of virgin aggregates because of the adhered mortar present on the recycled concrete aggregates. This reduction of the strength of recycled concrete aggregates depends on the amount of adhered mortar present on the aggregates. The possible solutions to improve the quality of recycled concrete aggregates are by strengthening the adhered mortar and the other by removing the adhered mortar also known as “beneficiation”. Both these ways include a number of methods, which are used to improve the quality of recycled concrete aggregates either by strengthening or by removing adhered mortar. This paper reviews the methods to improve the quality of recycled concrete aggregates and also points out the improvement done by each method.

Keywords

Beneficiation Recycled concrete aggregates Recycled aggregate concrete Hydrochloric acid Construction and demolition waste Compressive strength 

References

  1. Al-Bayati H et al (2016) Evaluation of various treatment methods for enhancing the physical and morphological properties of coarse recycled concrete aggregate. Constr Build Mater 112:284–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Corinaldesi V (2010) Mechanical and elastic behaviour of concretes made of recycled concrete coarse aggregates. Constr Build Mater 24(9):1616–1620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Elhakam AA et al (2012) Influence of self-healing, mixing method and adding silica fume on mechanical properties of recycled aggregates concrete. Constr Build Mater 35:421–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fathifazl G et al (2009) New mixture proportioning method for concrete made with coarse recycled concrete aggregate. J Mater Civil Eng 21(10):601–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gao XX et al (2013) A three-step method for the recovery of aggregates from concrete. Constr Build Mater 45:262–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Garcia-Gonzalez J et al (2014) Pre-saturation technique of the recycled aggregates: solution to the water absorption drawback in the recycled concrete manufacture. Materials 7:6224–6236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ghosh S, Aich A (2011) Rebuilding C&D waste recycling efforts in India. Waste Manag World 12:5Google Scholar
  8. Grabiec A et al (2012) Modification of recycled concrete aggregate by calcium carbonate bio deposition. Constr Build Mater 34:145–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Guneyisi E et al (2014) Effect of surface treatment methods on the properties of self-compacting concrete with recycled aggregates. Constr Build Mater 64:172–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ismail S, Ramli M (2013) Engineering properties of treated recycled concrete aggregate (RCA) for structural applications. Constr Build Mater 44:464–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ismail S, Ramli M (2014) Mechanical strength and drying shrinkage properties of concrete containing treated coarse recycled concrete aggregates. Constr Build Mater 68:726–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. IS: 1199-1959: Methods of sampling and analysis of concrete, Bureau of Indian StandardsGoogle Scholar
  13. Katz A (2003) Properties of concrete made with recycled aggregate from partially hydrated old concrete. Cem Concr Res 33(5):703–711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kosmatka SH et al (2002) Design and control of concrete mixtures, 7th edn. Cement Association of Canada, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  15. Pepe M et al (2014) Alternative processing procedures for recycled aggregates in structural concrete. Constr Build Mater 69:124–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Silva RV et al (2015) Carbonation behaviour of recycled aggregate concrete. Cem Concr Compos 62:22–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Spaeth V, Tegguer AD (2013) Improvement of recycled concrete aggregate properties by polymer treatments. Int J Sustain Built Environ 2:143–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Tam VWY, Tam CM (2005) Recycled Aggregates from concrete waste for higher grade of concrete construction. PhD thesis, Department of building and construction, City University of Hong KongGoogle Scholar
  19. Tam V et al (2007a) Optimization on proportion for recycled aggregate in concrete using two-stage mixing approach. Constr Build Mater 21:1928–1939Google Scholar
  20. Tam V et al (2007b) Removal of cement mortar remains from recycled aggregate using pre-soaking approaches. Resour Conserv Recycl 50:82–101Google Scholar
  21. Wang H et al (2013) Improving performance of recycled aggregate concrete with superfine pozzolanic powders. J Cent South Univ 20:3715–3722CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dr B R Ambedkar National Institute of TechnologyJalandharIndia
  2. 2.Lovely Professional UniversityPhagwaraIndia

Personalised recommendations