Advertisement

Issues Faced by Contemporary Commercial Singers in Sri Lanka

  • Gowri NanayakkaraEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

The PRR was introduced to Sri Lankan copyright law with the expectation of addressing the needs of the vocalists in the music industry. Nearly fifteen years since the introduction of the national PRR under the Intellectual Property Act of 2003, this chapter focuses on what the vocalists express or consider to be the issues they battle with in the practice of music—covering and secure position—in order to better understand their concerns and, in addition, to introduce the discussion in the following chapter on the adequacy of the national PRR to address such concerns. This chapter is based on the findings of the empirical study carried out in Sri Lanka. The chapter also makes comparisons with the UK, USA and Indian situations to highlight the distinctive position in Sri Lanka.

Keywords

Covering Secure position Belonging Remuneration Music royalty 

References

  1. Ajwani, D, ‘Unequal Music: Singers Demand Royalty but May Have to Take a Cut in Upfront Payment for Each Song’ (Forbes India, 4 November 2009) http://business.in.com/article/resolution/unequal-music/6242/1#ixzz1ZuGz1g2R.
  2. Arewa, O B, ‘From J C Bach to Hip Hop: Musical Borrowing, Copyright and Cultural Context’ (2006) 84 North Carolina Law Review 547, 550.Google Scholar
  3. Arewa, O B, ‘Copyright on Catfish Row: Musical Borrowing, Porgy and Bess, and Unfair Use’ (2006) 37 Rutgers Law Journal 277.Google Scholar
  4. Ariyaratne, Sunil, Gramophone Gee Yugaya (S Godage and Brothers 1986).Google Scholar
  5. Arnold, A, ‘Popular Film Song in India: A Case of Mass-Market Musical Eclecticism’ (1988) 7(2) Popular Music 177.Google Scholar
  6. Arnold, R, Performers’ Rights (4th edn, Sweet & Maxwell 2008).Google Scholar
  7. Baden-Fuller, C, Klimis, G M, Kretschmer, M, and Wallis, R, ‘Contested Collective Administration of Intellectual Property Rights in Music’ (1999) 14(1) European Journal of Communication 5.Google Scholar
  8. Bayton, M, ‘How Women Become Musicians’ in S Frith and A Goodwin (eds), On Record: Rock, Pop and the Written Word (Routledge 1990).Google Scholar
  9. BBC v Precord Ltd [1991] SRIS C/89/91 (Ch).Google Scholar
  10. Bennett, H S, ‘The Realities of Practice’ in S Frith and A Goodwin (eds), On Record: Rock, Pop and the Written Word (Routledge 1990).Google Scholar
  11. Boon, M, In Praise of Copying (Harvard University Press 2010).Google Scholar
  12. Boosey v White [1900] 1 (Ch 122).Google Scholar
  13. Bridgeport Music Inc. v Dimension Films 401 F.3d 647 (6th Cir. 2004).Google Scholar
  14. Butler, J, ‘Musical Works, Cover Versions and Strange Little Girls’ (2010) 7(1) Volume! La revue des musiques populaires 6.Google Scholar
  15. Chothani, P, ‘Managing Copyright in the Digital Era’ (2007) 171 Managing Intellectual Property 81.Google Scholar
  16. Coombe, Rosemary J, The Cultural Life of Intellectual Properties: Authorship, Appropriation and the Law (Duke University Press 1998).Google Scholar
  17. Cooper, B Lee, ‘Charting Cultural Change, 1953–57: Song Assimilation Through Cover Recording’ in G Plasketes (ed), Play It Again: Cover Songs in Popular Music (Ashgate 2010) 43.Google Scholar
  18. Cooper, D, Governing Out of Order: Space, Law and the Politics of Belonging (Rivers Oram Press 1988).Google Scholar
  19. Diddeniya, N, Arumasi Gee Sara (S Godage and Brothers 2002).Google Scholar
  20. Einhorn, M A, ‘Intellectual Property and Antitrust: Music Performing Rights in Broadcasting’ (2001) 24 Columbia-VLA Journal of Law and Arts 349.Google Scholar
  21. Evans, T M, ‘Sampling, Looping, and Mashing…..Oh My! How Hip Hop Music Is Scratching More Than the Surface of Copyright Law’ (2010) 10(26) Widener Law School Legal Studies Paper Series 843.Google Scholar
  22. Fonseka, Deepthi, Lata, Hela Gee Rejina, Charithapadanaya [Biography of Lata Walpola] (Sarasavi 2008).Google Scholar
  23. Gordon, W, ‘On Owning Information: Intellectual Property and the Restitutionary Impulse’ (1992) 78 Virginia Law Review 149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Grabham, E, ‘“Flagging” the Skin: Corporeal Nationalism and the Properties of Belonging’ (2009) 15(1) Body and Society 63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Grant Upright Music Ltd v Warner Brothers and Others (US District Court, 16 December 1991).Google Scholar
  26. Horn, D, ‘Some Thoughts on the Work in Popular Music’ in M Talbot (ed), The Musical Work: Reality or Invention (Liverpool University Press 2000).Google Scholar
  27. Jaszi, Peter, ‘Contemporary Copyright and Collective Creativity’ in Martha Woodmansee and Peter Jaszi (eds), The Construction of Authorship: Textual Appropriation in Law and Literature (Duke University Press 1994).Google Scholar
  28. Joshi, J N, ‘A Concise History of the Phonograph Industry in India’ (1988) 7(2) Popular Music 147.Google Scholar
  29. Keenan, S, Subversive Property: Law and the Production of Spaces of Belonging (Routledge 2014).Google Scholar
  30. Kim, J A, ‘The Performers’ Plight in Sound Recordings: Unique to the US—A Comparative Study of the Development of Performers’ Rights in the United States, England, and France’ (1985–1986) 10 Columbia-VLA Journal of Law and Arts 453.Google Scholar
  31. Klimis, G M, Kretschmer, M, and Wallis, R, ‘The Changing Location of Intellectual Property Rights in Music: A Study of Music Publishers, Collecting Societies and Media Conglomerates’ (1999) 17(2) Prometheus 169.Google Scholar
  32. Kohn, A, and Kohn, B, Kohn on Music Licensing (2nd edn, Aspen Law and Business 1996).Google Scholar
  33. Kolada, B, ‘New US Bill Aims to Improve How Musicians Get Paid on Digital Platforms’ https://www.residentadvisor.net/news.aspx?id=41631.
  34. Kondwani, ‘Full Circle: The Beatles & Hip Hop’ (It’s a Black-White Thang) http://www.kurrentmusic.com/blogviewer.html?blog-guid=9d2eab7e-99a4-4e2f-9767-387285c85d88.
  35. Krishnamurthy, N, ‘The Statutory Mechanical License in India: Whose Version [of the Law] Is Correct?’ (2007) 1 Manupatra Intellectual Property Rights 115.Google Scholar
  36. Lenig, S, ‘David Bowie’s Pin-Ups: Past and Prelude’ in G Plasketes (ed), Play It Again: Cover Songs in Popular Music (Ashgate 2010) 130.Google Scholar
  37. Manuel, P, ‘Popular Music in India: 1901–86’ (1988) 7(2) Popular Music 157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Manuel, P, ‘The Cassette Industry and Popular Music in North India’ (1991) 10(2) Popular Music 189.Google Scholar
  39. Mosser, Kurt, ‘“Cover Songs”: Ambiguity, Multivalence, Polysemy’ http://www.popular-musicology-online.com/issues/02/mosser.html.
  40. Nanayakkara, G, ‘Mimesis, Cover Versions and the Commercial Vocalists’ Dilemma; Sri Lankan Perspective’ (2012) 1 International Conference on Asian Studies: Official Conference Proceedings 461–474.Google Scholar
  41. Plasketes, G, ‘Re-flections on the Cover Age: A Collage of Continuous Coverage in Popular Music’ (2005) 28(2) Popular Music and Society 137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Plasketes, G, ‘Like a Version’ in G Plasketes (ed), Play It Again: Cover Songs in Popular Music (Ashgate 2010).Google Scholar
  43. Rimmer, M, ‘The Grey Album: The Copyright Law and Digital Sampling’ http://works.bepress.com/matthew_rimmer/16.
  44. Robinson, A, ‘UK Copyright and the Communication of Sound Recordings to the Public: The Slings and Arrows of Outrageous Fortunes’ (1995) 6 Entertainment Law Review 312.Google Scholar
  45. Rose, Mark, Authors and Owners: The Invention of Copyright (Harvard University Press 1994).Google Scholar
  46. Salmon, R, ‘Sampling and Sound Recording Reproduction: Fair Use or Infringement?’ (2010) 21(5) Entertainment Law Review 174, 176.Google Scholar
  47. Sherman, B, and Bently, L, ‘Cultures of Copying: Digital Sampling and Copyright Law’ (1992) 3 Entertainment Law Review 158.Google Scholar
  48. Smith, A L, ‘Other People’s Property: Hip-Hop’s Inherent Clashes with Property Laws and Its Ascendance as Global Counter Culture’ (2007) 7 Virginia Sports and Entertainment Law Journal 59.Google Scholar
  49. Sorcinelli, G, ‘How the Grey Album Reinvented the Re-mix’ https://medium.com/micro-chop/how-the-grey-album-re-invented-the-remix-740e7c9f2631.
  50. Subramanian, D, ‘Protection of Performers’ Rights: Evolution and Administration in India’ (2009) 20 Entertainment Law Review 139.Google Scholar
  51. Subramaniam, K, ‘Singers from South to Claim Their Due’ (The Hindu, Chennai, 20 August 2013) http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/singers-from-south-to-claim-their-due/article5040406.ece.
  52. Tikku, A, ‘Indian Inflow: The Interplay of Foreign Investment and Intellectual Property’ (1998) 19(1) Third World Quarterly 87.Google Scholar
  53. Tiwari, S V, ‘Finally After 5 Years, Indian Singers Claim First Royalty Amount’ https://www.mid-day.com/articles/finally-after-5-years-indian-singers-claim-first-royalty-amount/19317189.
  54. Tough, D, ‘The Mashup Mindset: Will Pop Eat Itself?’ in G Plasketes (ed), Play It Again: Cover Songs in Popular Music (Ashgate 2010) 212.Google Scholar
  55. Turner, D, ‘The Cover Song Quagmire’ (Music Dish, 11 June 2004) http://musicdish.com/mag/?id=9460.
  56. ‘US Bill on Radio Music Royalty Gets Key Backing’ (Intellectual Property Watch, 29 April 2010) http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/2010/04/29/us-bill-on-radio-music-royalties-gets-key-backing/.
  57. ‘WIPO Advisory Mission Report Commissioned by the Sri Lankan Mission in Geneva, Based on Consultation with Stakeholders and Detailed Examination of Current Copyright and Related Rights Protection System in Sri Lanka’ (Geneva Sri Lankan Mission, February 2009).Google Scholar
  58. Woodmansee, Martha, The Author, Art, and the Market (Columbia University Press 1994).Google Scholar
  59. Yampolsky, P, ‘Hati Yang Luka, an Indonesian Hit’ (1989) 47 Indonesia 1.Google Scholar
  60. Yuval-Davis, Nira, Kannabiran, Kalpana, and Vieten, Ulrike M, ‘Introduction’ in Nira Yuval-Davis, Kalpana Kannabiran, and Ulrike M Vieten (eds), The Situated Politics of Belonging (Sage 2006).Google Scholar
  61. Ziff, B, and Rao, P V, ‘Introduction to Cultural Appropriation: A Framework for Analysis’ in B Ziff and P V Rao (eds), Borrowed Power: Essays on Cultural Appropriation (Rutgers University Press 1997).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of LawCanterbury Christ Church UniversityCanterburyUK

Personalised recommendations