Advertisement

Language Tug-of-War: When English Literacy Education Encounters the National Matriculation English Test Policy in Mainland China

  • Fang He
  • Mark Feng TengEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

English literacy education has become more challenging in mainland China. Being inseparable from national political orientation, the National Matriculation English Test (NMET) policy has introduced both challenges and opportunities to English education at the secondary level. Through relevant document analysis, and interviews with eleven English learners and five teachers, we conclude that (a) the decisions made about English education should consider the society as a whole; (b) more parties (like ELT teachers and students) should be involved in the NMET policy making; and (c) English literacy education should not be jeopardized by the necessity of learning Chinese language and culture. English and Chinese instruction should complement each other rather than cause one language to wane while the other waxes.

References

  1. Adamson, B. (2002). Barbarian as a foreign language: English in China’s schools. World Englishes, 21(2), 231–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beijing Municipal Commission of Education. (2013). The reformation program of college entrance examination in 2014–2016 (exposure draft). Retrieved September 10, 2018 from http://www.gaokao.com/e/20131022/5265e08b89c7f.shtml.
  3. Bolton, K., & Graddol, D. (2012). English in china today. English Today, 28(3), 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Guo, Y. (2012). Teaching English for economic competiveness: Emerging issues and challenges in English education in China. Canadian and International Education, 41(2), 28–50.Google Scholar
  5. Harvey, P. (1985). A lesson to be learned: Chinese approaches to language learning. ELT Journal, 39(3), 255–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Jia, Q., & Ericson, D. P. (2017). Equity and access to higher education in China: Lessons from Hunan province for university admissions policy. International Journal of Educational Development, 52, 97–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kaplan, R. B., Baldauf, R. B., Jr., & Kamwangamalu, R. (2011). Why educational language plans sometimes fail. Current Issues in Language Planning, 12(2), 105–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lam, A. S. L. (2002). English in education in China: Policy changes and learners’ experiences. World Englishes, 21(2), 245–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Leung, Y. J. (1991). Curriculum development in the People’s Republic of China. In C. Marsh & P. Morris (Eds.), Curriculum development in East Asia (pp. 61–81). London, UK: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  10. Li, M. L. (2007). Foreign language education in primary schools in the People’s Republic of China. Current Issues in Language Planning, 8(2), 148–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Li, M. L. (2010). EFL teachers and English language education in the PRC: Are they the policy makers? The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 19(3), 439–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Li, X. J. (1990). How powerful can a language test be? The MET in China. Journal of Multilingual & Multicultural Development, 11(5), 393–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Liu, F. L. (2016). The official trilogy and public paradox: Understanding mainland Chinese policies of ELT on secondary level from the perspective of culture politics. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 1, 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Liu, Q. S. (2017). The development of the NMET over the past forty years. China Examination, 2, 13–19.Google Scholar
  15. Liu, Y. D. (2011). Thoroughly implementing the national general language law and comprehensively promoting the cause of science language development. Retrieved September 10, 2018 from http://www.docin.com/p-364169771.html.
  16. Ministry of Education. (2007). Full-time compulsory education standard of English course for senior middle school. Beijing: Beijing Normal University Publishing House.Google Scholar
  17. Ministry of Education. (2011). English curriculum standards for compulsory education. Beijing: Beijing Normal University Publishing House.Google Scholar
  18. Muthanna, A., & Sang, G. (2016). Undergraduate Chinese students’ perspectives on Gaokao examination: Strengths, weaknesses, and implications. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 5(2), 3–12.Google Scholar
  19. National Education Examination Authority. (2017). The NMET syllabus for the year 2018. Retrieved September 10, 2018 from http://gaokao.eol.cn/gkdg/yy/201712/t20171215_1573576.shtml.
  20. Phillipson, R. (2009). Linguistic imperialism continued. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Qi, G. Y. (2016). The importance of English in primary school education in China: Perceptions of students. Multilingual Education, 6(1), 1–18.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13616-016-0026-0.
  22. Sohu Education. (2018). A new record: 9.75 million Chinese students will take part in the 2018 Gaokao. Retrieved May 25, 2018 from http://www.sohu.com/a/232782192_803603.
  23. Teng, F. (2018). Autonomy, agency, and identity in teaching and learning English as a foreign language. Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
  24. Teng, F. (2019). The benefits of metacognitive reading strategy awareness instruction for young learners of English as a second language. Literacy.  https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12181.
  25. Wei, R., & Su, J. (2012). The statistics of English in China. English Today, 28(3), 10–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Xinhua News. (2017). NPC member proposed the cancellation of NMET and received agreement from most netizens. Retrieved September 10, 2018 from http://news.timedg.com/2017-03/08/20564220.shtml.
  27. Zheng, Y. (2014). A phantom to kill: The challenges for Chinese learners to use English as a global language. English Today, 30(4), 34–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nanning UniversityNanningChina
  2. 2.Hong Kong Baptist UniversityKowloon TongHong Kong

Personalised recommendations