Language Tug-of-War: When English Literacy Education Encounters the National Matriculation English Test Policy in Mainland China
English literacy education has become more challenging in mainland China. Being inseparable from national political orientation, the National Matriculation English Test (NMET) policy has introduced both challenges and opportunities to English education at the secondary level. Through relevant document analysis, and interviews with eleven English learners and five teachers, we conclude that (a) the decisions made about English education should consider the society as a whole; (b) more parties (like ELT teachers and students) should be involved in the NMET policy making; and (c) English literacy education should not be jeopardized by the necessity of learning Chinese language and culture. English and Chinese instruction should complement each other rather than cause one language to wane while the other waxes.
- Beijing Municipal Commission of Education. (2013). The reformation program of college entrance examination in 2014–2016 (exposure draft). Retrieved September 10, 2018 from http://www.gaokao.com/e/20131022/5265e08b89c7f.shtml.
- Guo, Y. (2012). Teaching English for economic competiveness: Emerging issues and challenges in English education in China. Canadian and International Education, 41(2), 28–50.Google Scholar
- Leung, Y. J. (1991). Curriculum development in the People’s Republic of China. In C. Marsh & P. Morris (Eds.), Curriculum development in East Asia (pp. 61–81). London, UK: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
- Liu, Q. S. (2017). The development of the NMET over the past forty years. China Examination, 2, 13–19.Google Scholar
- Liu, Y. D. (2011). Thoroughly implementing the national general language law and comprehensively promoting the cause of science language development. Retrieved September 10, 2018 from http://www.docin.com/p-364169771.html.
- Ministry of Education. (2007). Full-time compulsory education standard of English course for senior middle school. Beijing: Beijing Normal University Publishing House.Google Scholar
- Ministry of Education. (2011). English curriculum standards for compulsory education. Beijing: Beijing Normal University Publishing House.Google Scholar
- Muthanna, A., & Sang, G. (2016). Undergraduate Chinese students’ perspectives on Gaokao examination: Strengths, weaknesses, and implications. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 5(2), 3–12.Google Scholar
- National Education Examination Authority. (2017). The NMET syllabus for the year 2018. Retrieved September 10, 2018 from http://gaokao.eol.cn/gkdg/yy/201712/t20171215_1573576.shtml.
- Phillipson, R. (2009). Linguistic imperialism continued. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Qi, G. Y. (2016). The importance of English in primary school education in China: Perceptions of students. Multilingual Education, 6(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13616-016-0026-0.
- Sohu Education. (2018). A new record: 9.75 million Chinese students will take part in the 2018 Gaokao. Retrieved May 25, 2018 from http://www.sohu.com/a/232782192_803603.
- Teng, F. (2018). Autonomy, agency, and identity in teaching and learning English as a foreign language. Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
- Teng, F. (2019). The benefits of metacognitive reading strategy awareness instruction for young learners of English as a second language. Literacy. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12181.
- Xinhua News. (2017). NPC member proposed the cancellation of NMET and received agreement from most netizens. Retrieved September 10, 2018 from http://news.timedg.com/2017-03/08/20564220.shtml.