Advertisement

Multi-layer Location Verification System in MANETs

  • Jingyi DongEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 516)

Abstract

The mobility and feasibility of mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs) have to deeply rely on the accurate location information to support multiple applications. A wrong announced location of a node may cause some serious consequences. Thus, the localization and the location security should be considered as important parts of the whole design of the MANETs. In the traditional way, the location verification schemes need complex calculation and multi-step communication with base stations and other vehicles, which are strengthen the burden of the MANETs routings and increased the complexity of protocol. In this paper, an improved multi-layer location verification system (MLVS) based on the optimal common neighbor’s knowledge between claimer and verifier in MANETs is been proposed and discussed. In this system, each node in MANETs could have a trust value, and a mutually shared token scheme is provided to make the decision of the MLVS. Furthermore, the MLVS shows a reliable performance on the ability of attacker defense and accuracy in high node density networks.

Keywords

Mobile ad hoc networks Location verification system MLVS Location security 

References

  1. 1.
    Tippenhauer NO, Rasmussen KB, Pöpper C, Capkun S. iPhone and iPod location spoofing: attacks on public WLAN-based positioning systems. SysSec technical Report. Swiss Federal Institute of Technology; 2012 Apr. 2008.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Malaney RA. A location enabled wireless security system. In Global telecommunications conference, 2004. GLOBECOM’04. IEEE; 2004. pp. 2196–200.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Faria DB, Cheriton DR. Detecting identity-based attacks in wireless networks using signalprints. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM workshop on wireless security; 2006. pp. 43–52.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Papadimitratos P, Gligor V, Hubaux JP. Securing vehicular communications-assumptions, requirements and principles. Proc ESCAR. 2006:5–14.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Papadimitratos P, Buttyan L, Holczer T, Schoch E, Freudiger J, Raya M, Hubaux JP. Secure vehicular communication systems: design and architecture. IEEE Commun Mag. 2009;46(11):100–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bauer K, McCoy D, Anderson E, Breitenbach M, Grudic G, Grunwald D, Sicker D. The directional attack on wireless localization: how to spoof your location with a tin can. In: Proceedings of the 28th IEEE conference on global telecommunications; 2009. pp. 4125–30.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yan S, Malaney R. Location verification systems in emerging wireless networks. arXiv preprint; 2013 arXiv:1307.3348.
  8. 8.
    Abumansoor O, Boukerche A. A secure cooperative approach for nonline-of-sight location verification in VANET. IEEE Trans Veh Technol. 2012;61(1):275–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vora A, Nesterenko M. Secure location verification using radio broadcast. IEEE Trans Dependable Secure Comput. 2006;3(4):2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kaiwartya O, Kumar S. Cache agent-based geocasting in VANETs. Int J Inf Commun Technol. 2015;7(6):562–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Suthaputchakun C, Sun Z. Routing protocol in intervehicle communication systems: a survey. IEEE Commun Mag. 2011;49(12):150–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ansari K, Feng Y, Singh J. Study of a geo-multicast framework for efficient message dissemination at unmanned level crossings. IET Intell Transp Syst. 2013;8(4):425–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cao Y, Sun Z, Wang N, Riaz M, Cruickshank H, Liu X. Geographic-based spray-and-relay (GSaR): an efficient routing scheme for DTNs. IEEE Trans Veh Technol. 2015;64(4):1548–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kim IH, Kim BS, Song J. An efficient location verification scheme for static wireless sensor networks. Sensors. 2017;17(2):225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kargl F, Klenk A, Schlott S. Weber M. Advanced detection of selfish or malicious nodes in ad hoc networks. In: European workshop on security in Ad-hoc and sensor networks; 2014. pp. 152–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Electrical Engineering and Telecommunications, The University of New South WalesSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations