Advertisement

A Novel Framework for Evaluation of Failure Risk in Thermal Power Industry

  • Dilbagh PanchalEmail author
  • Mohit Tyagi
  • Anish Sachdeva
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes on Multidisciplinary Industrial Engineering book series (LNMUINEN)

Abstract

The aim of this research work is to develop a novel integrated framework for improving the availability of Water Circulation System (WCS) of a thermal power industry located in the northern part of India. Qualitative information related to system’s operation has been collected on the basis of feedback from maintenance experts/log book record and using that information, Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) sheet was generated. Fuzzy ratings have been assigned by the experts on the basis of designed linguistic scale for three risk factors, namely occurrence probability (O), severity probability (S), and detection probability (D). Fuzzy Risk Priority Number (FRPN) has been computed for each failure cause and ranking was done in descending order. Further, for testing the stability and robustness of ranking results fuzzy Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS) approach has been applied within fuzzy FMEA approach. Appraisal score values have been computed as EDAS output and ranking of failure causes was done. Ranking results were compared for effective decision-making of critical failure causes. The implork shows its effectiveness in overcoming the limitations of rule base FMEA approach. The ranking results would be supplied to the maintenance manager of the plant for developing an effective maintenance program for WCS. The analysis result will be highly useful in minimizing the total operational cost of the considered unit.

Keywords

Thermal power industry Water circulation system Fuzzy FMEA Failure EDAS Availability 

References

  1. 1.
    Adar, E., Ince, M., Karatop, B., Bilgili, M.S.: The risk analysis by failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) and fuzzy FMEA of supercritical water gasification system used in the sewage sludge treatment. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 5(1), 1261–1268 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bowles, J.B.: An assessment of RPN prioritization in a failure modes effects and criticality analysis. In: Proceedings of the Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, pp. 380–386 (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chen, C.B., Klien, C.M.: A simple approach to ranking a group of aggregated fuzzy utilities. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B 27(1), 26–35 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Garg, H.: Performance and behavior analysis of repairable industrial systems using vague Lambda-Tau methodology. Appl. Soft Comput. 22, 323–328 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ghorabaee, M.K., Zavadskas, E.K., Amiri, M., Turskis, Z.: Extended EDAS method for fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making: a application for supplier selection. Int. J. Comput. Commun. Control 11(3): 358–371 (2016). ISSN 1841-9836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ghorabaee, M.K., Amiri, M., Zavadskas, E.K., Turskis, Z., Antucheviciene, J.: A new multi-criteria model based on interval type-2 fuzzy sets and EDAS method for supplier evaluation and order allocation with environmental considerations. Comput. Ind. Eng. 112, 156–174 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Maleki, H., Saadat, Y.: Comparison of failure mode and effects analysis by using AHP vs. REMBRANDT system. Int. J. Ind. Syst. Eng. 14(1): 5–19 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Panchal, D., Kumar, D.: Risk analysis of compressor house unit of thermal power plant. Int. J. Ind. Syst. Eng. 25(2), 228–250 (2017)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Panchal, D., Kumar, D.: Integrated framework for behaviour analysis in process plant. J. Loss Prev. Process. Ind. 40, 147–161 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Panchal, D., Kumar, D.: Stochastic behaviour analysis of power generating unit in thermal power plant using fuzzy methodology. OPSEARCH 53(1), 16–40 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Panchal, D., Kumar, D.: Stochastic behaviour analysis of real industrial system. Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manag. 8(2), 1126–1142 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Panchal, D., Jamwal, U., Srivastava, P., Kamboj, K., Sharma, R.: Fuzzy methodology application for failure analysis of transmission system. Int. J. Math. Oper. Res. 12(2), 220–237 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Panchal, D., Mangala, S., Tyagi, M., Ram, M.: Risk analysis for clean and sustainable production in a urea fertilizer industry. Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag. 35(7), 1459–1476 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Panchal, D., Srivastva, P.: Qualitative analysis of CNG dispensing system using fuzzy FMEA–GRA integrated approach. Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manag. (2018). doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-018-0750-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sharma, R.K., Sharma, P.: Integrated framework to optimize RAM and cost decision in process plant. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 25, 883–904 (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sharma, R.K., Kumar, D., Kumar, P.: Systematic failure mode and effect analysis using fuzzy linguistic modeling. Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag. 22(9), 886–1004 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sharma, R.K., Kumar, D., Kumar, P.: Behaviour analysis and resource optimization for an industrial system. Int. J. Ind. Syst. Eng. 2(4), 413–443 (2007)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tay, K.M., Lim, C.P.: Fuzzy FMEA with a guided rules reduction system for prioritization of failures. Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag. 23(8), 1047–1066 (2006)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tyagi, M., Kumar, P., Kumar, D.: Selecting alternatives for improvement in IT enabled supply chain performance. Int. J. Procure. Manag. 7(2), 168–182 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tyagi, M., Kumar, P., Kumar, D.: Assessment of critical enablers for flexible supply chain performance measurement system using fuzzy DEMATEL approach. Glob. J. Flex. Syst. Manag. 16(2), 115–132 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wang, L., Chu, J., Wu, J.: Selection of optimum maintenance strategies based on a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 107(1), 151–163 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Xu, K., Tang, L.C., Xie, M.: Fuzzy assessment of FMEA for engine system. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 75(1), 17–29 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhou, Q., Thai, V.V.: Fuzzy and grey theories in failure mode and effect analysis for tanker equipment failure prediction. Saf. Sci. 83, 74–79 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy Sets, Fuzzy Logic, Fuzzy Systems: Selected Papers. World Scientific, Singapore (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zimmermann, H.: Fuzzy Set Theory and Its Applications, 3rd edn, Kluwer Academic Publishers (1996)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Industrial and Production EngineeringDr. B. R. Ambedkar National Institute of TechnologyJalandharIndia

Personalised recommendations