Advertisement

Economic Development and Effects on Land

  • Shreyas P. BharuleEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Transportation, economic development and drawing parallels in the two have been a subject of interest for a long time now. Studies have argued that the economic effects of transport infrastructure investments on the location are subject to externalities. Although most of the studies claim locational externalities to have imparted a large chunk in improving the economic development in the form of a spill-over effect of infrastructure investments, they have been mostly indicative. The chapter focuses on a lesser highlighted area of the sequence of decisions which create externalities over the period that either helps in attaining the envisioned development or completely changes the form of spatial development. Such susceptibility of the uncertainty of a positive spill-over gives rise to specific intertemporal concerns. Discussing the example of the Mumbai-Pune Expressway, located in an emerging economy like India, the chapter explains the process of decision-making which went in the process of adopting such specialized infrastructure known as road development plans. The study takes the case of the Mumbai-Pune Expressway and its surroundings to explain the effects of decisions made during the implementation of the project on the land. The chapter concludes that appropriate governance mechanisms like incentivizing through land trusts can most certainly bring in a positive spill-over effect of the infrastructure development despite intertemporal concerns.

References

  1. Alonso, W. (1964). The historic and the structural theories of urban form: Their implications for urban renewal. Land Economics, 40(2), 227–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amdam, R. (2001). Empowering new regional political institutions: A Norwegian case. Planning Theory & Practice, 2(2), 169–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Banister, D., & Berechman, Y. (2001). Transport investments and the promotion of economic growth. Journal of Transport Geography, 9, 209–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Black, W. (2001). An unpopular essay on transportation. Journal of Transport Geography, 9(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Capello, R. (2011). Location, regional growth and local development theories. Aestimum, 58, 1–25.Google Scholar
  6. Gauthier, H. (1970). Geography, transportation, and regional growth. Economic Geography, 46, 612–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hillier, J. (2008). Plan speaking: A multiplanner theory of spatial planning. Planning Theory, 7(1), 24–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hoover, E. (1936). The measurement of industrial location. The Review of Economic Statistics, 18(4), 162–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hoover, E. M., & Fisher, J. L. (1949). Research in regional economic growth. In Problems in the study of economic growth (pp. 173–250). Universities-National Bureau. Retrieved from https://www.nber.org/chapters/c9514.pdf.
  10. Isard, W. (1951). Distance inputs and the space economy. Quarterly Journal of Economics, LXV, 188–198.Google Scholar
  11. Krugman, P. (1991). Geography and trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  12. March, A. (2010). Practising theory: When theory affects urban planning. Planning Theory, 9(2), 108–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Martinez, F., & Araya, C. (2000). Transport and land-use benefits under locational externalities. Environment and Planning, 32(9), 1611–1624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mohring, H. (1976). Transport economics. Cambridge: Ballinger.Google Scholar
  15. North, D. (1955). Location theory and regional economic growth. The Journal of Political Economy, 63, 243–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Perroux, F. (1955). Note sur la notion de pole de croissance. Economic Appliqee.Google Scholar
  17. Rephann, T., & Isserman, A. (1994). New highways as economic development tools: An evaluation using quasi-experimental matching methods. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 24(6), 723–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Roy, A. (2011). Urbanisms, worlding practices and the theory of planning. Planning Theory, 10(1), 6–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The University of TokyoTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Asian Development Bank Institute (ADBI)TokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations