Advertisement

Poverty and Inequality: A Disaggregated Analysis

  • Amaresh Dubey
  • Shivakar TiwariEmail author
Chapter
Part of the India Studies in Business and Economics book series (ISBE)

Abstract

This article finds an appreciable rate of reduction in poverty at about 1.6% annually between 2004–05 and 2011–12 in the state of Uttar Pradesh, which has been largely in rural areas and that too among SCs and Others and across economic regions. In contrast, the incidence of poverty increased in urban areas of the state by 1.32% during 2004–05 to 2011–12, showing the urbanisation of rural poverty due to lack of remunerative employment opportunities and social security measures. However, poverty in the state is predominantly rural. In 2011–12, around 48 million out of 60 million poor people in the state were living in its rural area. The article estimates the poverty in the state at more disaggregated level of 17 administrative divisions (ADs) with an objective to suggest effective policy interventions and make a concerted dent on poverty. The incidence of poverty varies significantly across different regions and ADs of the state. The Eastern region has the highest poverty incidence, while Western region has the lowest, the latter being the most developed relatively among the four regions. The ADs with high incidence of poverty are Basti, Chitrakoot, Devipatan and Lucknow in the Eastern and Central economic regions, which are highly deprived and need to be targeted for poverty reduction. Along with the absolute levels of deprivations, there is huge inequality in distribution of income and consumption expenditure particularly in urban areas that severely hampers the pace of poverty reduction. In 2011–12, Gini coefficient of consumption expenditure distribution was 43 and 27%, respectively, for urban and rural areas in the state. It is found that regions and divisions with high urbanisation level and better rural connectivity have lower poverty incidence. Thus, given the large share of rural population, improving agricultural productivity and subsequently developing vibrant and integrated urban centres would be a highly effective strategy to achieve the target of eradicating extreme poverty from the state.

Keywords

Growth and redistribution Poverty Urbanisation Administrative divisions Inequality 

References

  1. Ahluwalia, M. S. (1978). Rural poverty and agriculture performance in India. Journal of Development Studies, 14(3), 298–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Diwakar, D. M. (2009). Intra-regional disparities, inequality and poverty in Uttar Pradesh. Economic and Political Weekly, 44(26 & 27), 264–273.Google Scholar
  3. Dubey, A., Gangopadhyay, S., & Wadhwa, W. (2001). Occupational structure and incidence of poverty in Indian towns of different sizes. Review of Development Economics, 5(1), 49–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. GOI. (1979). The report of the task force on projections of minimum needs and effective consumption demand, perspective planning division, planning commission, New Delhi.Google Scholar
  5. GOI. (1997). The report of the expert group on estimation of proportion and number of poor, perspective planning division, planning commission, New Delhi.Google Scholar
  6. GOI. (2009). The report of the expert group to review the methodology for estimation of poverty, perspective planning division, planning commission, New Delhi.Google Scholar
  7. Himanshu. (2007). Recent trends in poverty and inequality: some preliminary results. Economic and Political Weekly, 42(5), 497–508.Google Scholar
  8. India Human Development Surveys (IHDS) 2004–05 and 2011–12, National Council of Applied Economic Research, New Delhi and University of Maryland, USA.Google Scholar
  9. Macmillian, M. S., & Rodrik, D. (2011). Globalisation, structural change and productivity growth. Working Paper 17143, National bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  10. Ranjan, S. (2009). Growth of rural non-farm employment in Uttar Pradesh: Reflections from recent data. Economic and Political Weekly, 44(4), 63–70.Google Scholar
  11. Thorat, S., & Dubey, A. (2012). Has growth been socially inclusive in the period between 1993-94-2009-10? Economic and Political Weekly, 47(10), 43–53.Google Scholar
  12. Tiwari, S. (2014). Assessment of growth, poverty, and inequality in Uttar Pradesh: A long term analysis. Journal of Economic and Social Development, 10(1), 31–44.Google Scholar
  13. United Nations. (2015). Transforming the world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development, Retrieved on July 25th, 2017 from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/21252030%20Agenda%20for%20Sustainable%20Development%20web.pdf.
  14. World Bank. (2016). Uttar Pradesh: poverty, growth and inequality, Retrieved on July 26th, 2017 from http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/187721467995647501/pdf/105884-BRI-P157572-ADD-SERIES-India-state-briefs-PUBLIC-UttarPradesh-Proverty.pdf.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for the Study of Regional DevelopmentJawaharlal Nehru UniversityNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations