Advertisement

Health Status: Progress and Challenges

  • Mohammad Zahid Siddiqui
  • Srinivas GoliEmail author
  • Md Juel Rana
  • Swastika Chakravorty
Chapter
Part of the India Studies in Business and Economics book series (ISBE)

Abstract

Achieving grand convergence in global health and bridging the gap between the countries, within country and between the states are important targets of ongoing SDGs. India is often described as a country with substantial progress in average health status alongside sizable geographical, rural–urban, social, economic and bio-demographic disparities. Although the country is witnessing a considerable improvement in health status across the states, alongside a steeper inter- and intra-state differentials in the speed of improvement coexist. Lack of equity with progress in the health status of the population in the laggard states of India is one of the key features in its growth story. In this backdrop, the paper examines the hypothesis that whether the districts of Uttar Pradesh are converging towards a homogenous state or diverging and explores its determinants. We have used the data from Census 2001 and 2011 published by Registrar General of India (RGI) for estimation of district-wise life expectancy for all persons, males and females separately. Further, for assessing the determinants, we have used multiple data sources for various indicators which are considered as predictors of Life Expectancy at Birth (LEB) in the previous literature. We have estimated LEB at the district level for all persons, males and females for the year 2001 and 2011 using the well-known Brass method for indirect estimation of IMR, child mortality rate (CMR) and corresponding LEB of different model life table parameters. We have adopted novel approaches to the objective of testing of convergence hypothesis in average health status and health inequalities across the districts. The inequality measures range from absolute inequality measured through Dispersion Measure of Mortality (DMM) to relative inequality measured through Gini index. The convergence in health status was examined by using the standard parametric models (absolute β- and σ-convergences). Further, non-parametric econometric models (kernel density estimates) have also been used to detect the presence of convergence clubs, and finally we have analysed the determinant of convergence through panel regression model. Findings revealed that the inequality-based measures of convergence suggest that convergence process is underway regarding both absolute and relative inequalities in LEB across the districts, during 2001–2011. Similarly, the findings based on catching-up plots and absolute β-convergence and sigma convergence measures affirm the convergence across districts of Uttar Pradesh. The presence of a strong evidence of convergence clubs indicates that growth process is not inclusive and is skewed to few district clusters of the state. LEB growth process has favoured some districts compared to other. Further, findings of determinants of health status suggest that decrease in infant mortality, progress in income level, improvement in literacy rate, full immunisation of children and health infrastructure in laggard districts would help in convergence of the health status across the geographical space in the state of Uttar Pradesh. Achieving health goals of SDGs in Uttar Pradesh will not possible unless acceleration in the speed of the convergence is achieved with equity. The state should prioritise the agenda for reduction of IMR, a substantial increase in literacy rate and major investment in healthcare infrastructural availability and accessibility, universal access to immunisation services, especially in the laggard districts of the state.

Keywords

Life expectancy at birth Convergence Determinants 

References

  1. Barro, R. J. (1991). Economic growth in a cross-section of countries. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, 407–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barro, R. J., & Sala-I-Martin, X. (1992). Convergence. The Journal of Political Economy, 100, 223–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barro, R. J., & Sala-I-Martin, X. (1997). Technological diffusion, convergence and growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 2(1), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blas, E., & Kurup, S. A. (2010). Synergy for equity. In E. Blas, & S. A. Kurup (Eds.), Equity, social determinants and public health programmes (pp. 261–284). World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  5. Bloom, D. E., & Canning, D. (2007). Mortality traps and the dynamics of health transitions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(41), 16044–16049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Census. (2001). Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India. 2001. Home/Population Enumeration/Final Population. New Delhi: Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India, Ministry of Home Affairs.Google Scholar
  7. Census. (2011) Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India. 2011. Home/Population Enumeration/Final Population. New Delhi: Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India, Ministry of Home Affairs.Google Scholar
  8. Coale, A. J., & Trussell, T. J. (1977). Estimating the time to which Brass estimates apply. Population Bulletin of the United Nations, 10, 87–89.Google Scholar
  9. Deaton, A. (2013). The great escape: Health, wealth, and the origins of inequality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dorius, S. F., & Firebugh, G. (2010). Trends in global gender inequality. Social Forces, 88(5), 1941–1968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Drèze, J., & Sen, A. (2013). An uncertain glory: India and its contradictions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Feeney, G. (1980). Estimating infant mortality trends from child survivorship data. Population Studies. A Journal of Demography Publication details, 34(1), 109–128.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.1980.10412839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Global Health Observatory [GHO]. (2017). Monitoring health for SDGs. Retrieved June 15, 2017 from http://www.who.int/gho/en/.
  14. Goli, S., & Arokiasamy, P. (2013). Trends in health and health inequalities among major states of India: Assessing progress through convergence models. Health Economics, Policy and Law.  https://doi.org/10.1017/s1744133113000042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goli, S., & Arokiasamy, P. (2014a). Maternal and child mortality indicators across 187 countries of the world: Converging or diverging. Global Public Health, 9(3), 342–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goli, S., & Arokiasamy, P. (2014b). Trends in health and health inequalities among major states of India: Assessing progress through convergence models. Health Economics, Policy and Law, 9(2), 143–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goli, S., Doshi, R., & Arokiasamy, P. (2013). Pathways of economic inequalities in maternal and child health in urban India: A decomposition analysis. PLoS ONE, 8(3), e58573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hill, K. (2013). Indirect estimation of child mortality. In T. A. Moultrie, R. E. Dorrington, A. G. Hill, K. Hill, I. M. Timæus, & B. Zaba (Eds.), Tools for demographic estimation. Paris: The International Union for the Scientific Study of Population. Retrieved June 30, 2017 from http://demographicestimation.iussp.org/content/indirect-estimation-child-mortality.
  19. International Institute for Population Sciences [IIPS] and Ministry of Health and Family Welfare [MoHFM]. (2017). National family and health survey: Fact sheet. Government of India.Google Scholar
  20. James, K. S., & Goli, S. (2016). Demographic changes in India: Is the country prepared for the challenge? The Brown Journal of World Affairs, 23(1), 169–188.Google Scholar
  21. Lim, S. S., Allen, K., Bhutta, Z. A., Dandona, L., Forouzanfar, M. H., Pullman, N., et al. (2016). Measuring the health-related sustainable development goals in 188 countries: A baseline analysis from the global burden of disease study 2015. Lancet, 388, 1813–1850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Marmot, M. (2015). The health gap: The challenge of an unequal world. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
  23. McMichael, A. J., Mckee, M., Shkolnikov, V., & Valkonen, T. (2004). Mortality trends and setbacks: Global convergence or divergence? Lancet, 363, 1155–1159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Milanovic, B. (2016). Global inequality: A new approach for the age of globalization. Panoeconomicus, 63(4), 493–501.Google Scholar
  25. Moser, K., Shkolnikov, V., & Leon, D. (2005). World mortality 1950–2000: Divergence replaces convergence from the late 1980s. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 83(3), 202–209.Google Scholar
  26. Office of the Registrar General of India. (2014). Sample registration system year book. New Delhi: Government of India.Google Scholar
  27. Office of the Registrar General of India. (2015). Sample registration system year book. New Delhi: Government of India.Google Scholar
  28. Office of the Registrar General of India. (2016). Sample registration system year book. New Delhi: Government of India.Google Scholar
  29. Oxfam. (2017). Oxfam briefing paper—Executive summary. Retrieved June 15, 2017 from https://www.oxfam.org/sites/www.oxfam.org/files/file_attachments/bp-inclusive-growth-africa-020517-summ-en.pdf.
  30. Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  31. Preston, S., Heuveline, P., & Guillot, M. (2000). Demography: Measuring and modelling population processes. New York, NY: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
  32. Quah, D. T. (1993). Empirical cross-section dynamics in economic growth. European Economic Review, 37, 426–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Romer, P. M. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94, 1002–1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shkolnikov, V. M., Andreev, E. M., & Begun, A. (2003). Gini coefficient as a life table function: Computation from discrete data, decomposition of differences and empirical examples. Demographic Research, 8, 305–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Smith, K. E., Hunter, D. J., Blackman, T., Elliott, E., Greene, A., Harrington, B. E., et al. (2009). Divergence or convergence? Health inequalities and policy in a devolved Britain. Critical Social Policy, 29(2), 216–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stiglitz, J. (2015). The great divide. UK: Penguin.Google Scholar
  37. Strulik, H., & Vollmer, S. (2015). The fertility transition around the world. Journal of Population Economics, 28(1), 31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Torres-Reyna, O. (2007). Panel data analysis fixed and random affects using Stata (v. 4.2). In Data & Statistical Services, Princeton University.Google Scholar
  39. United Nations. (1983). Estimation of child mortality from information on children ever born and children surviving, Manual X: Indirect techniques for demographic estimation. Population Studies, 81, 73–96.Google Scholar
  40. Wagstaff, A. (2002). Poverty and health sector inequalities. Bulletin of World Health Organization, 80(2), e97–e105.Google Scholar
  41. Wang, Y. (2004). A nonparametric analysis of the personal income distribution across the provinces and states in the US and Canada. Regional and Sectoral Economic Studies, 4(1), 5–24.Google Scholar
  42. Whitehead, M., Dahgren, G., & Evans, T. (2001). Equity and health sector reforms: Can low-income countries escape the medical poverty trap? Lancet, 358, 833–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. World Health Organization. (2015). Monitoring health inequality: An essential step for achieving health equity Updated 2015 version. http://www.who.int/iris/handle/10665/164530
  44. Young, A. T., Higgins, M. J., & Levy, D. (2008). Σ-convergence versus β-convergence: Evidence form U.S. county-level data. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 40, 1083–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohammad Zahid Siddiqui
    • 1
  • Srinivas Goli
    • 1
    Email author
  • Md Juel Rana
    • 1
  • Swastika Chakravorty
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for the Study of Regional DevelopmentJawaharlal Nehru UniversityNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations